My daughter knows I love her absolutely. Should this world eventually accept apartheid (which will be necessary for White survival), I will have to live in an area of mixed races to be with her… though I would always desire to be in the White areas. But I am her father for better or for worse. I brought her into this world and she didn’t have a choice for her racial makeup. The sin is mine.

All that said, I am a White nationalist and am as anti-Semitic as one can possibly be. The Jewish issue is THE problem of the world. Everything else is a side issue. I believe the Germanic people are the cream of the crop and the world is a better place because of their accomplishments.

I appreciate the new network, best of luck. Your work is always enjoyable, interesting and enlightening.

[Tan here: Thank you Douglas. Please direct the second part of your comment to Carolyn’s program post.]

Passing judgement impetuously on his personal life is somewhat inappropriate, considering his distinguished efforts for a very noble cause.

However, since Tanstaafl himself lays the matter of his jewish father-in-law out in the open, and indeed, invites to debate on the subject, I will comment briefly.

Given the grave demographic circumstances we find ourselves in as a race, we simply cannot afford losing more ground on this crucial “battlefield of the bedrooms”.

This realization translates readily into three very basic prohibitions for the racially awakened white loyalist:

1. No inter-racial marriages
2. No inter-racial childbirths
3. No adoption of racially foreign children

Now, as I understand Tanstaafl’s elucidation, his racial awareness only fully matured after having had children who are, strictly speaking, genetically 25% ashkenazi jewish.
If this is so, I can surely understand his dilemma, and even sympathize with his devotion to his core family-unit as a father and husband.

Let me explicate my reasons for granting dispensation from the zero-tolerance stance in this particular case:

A white man of healthy genetic quality is a valuable asset in our continuous struggle for demographic survival.
A white woman of similar quality, however, is even more so.
This has to do with the biological limits to her reproductive fecundity, as compared to the man’s almost lifelong fertility.

Therefore, it is less of a burden, demographically, to have a white man begetting mestizos, than a white woman investing costly pregnancies before giving birth to the half-breeds.
The white male race-traitor could, with relative biological ease, recompense for his genetic betrayal, by utilizing his still intact ability to engender white children in the future, whereas the white female race-traitor, under all circumstances, would have lost a much larger, relative share of her reproductive potential, with a considerable likelihood, even, of having lost it entirely.

Furthermore, I have noticed a subtle difference in mulattoes, contingent upon whether the father or the mother is white.
If the father is white, the mulatto child/adolescent often looks and acts conspicuously less negroid than when the reverse is the case.
This real-life observation confirms, or at least strengthens, the theory that dominant genes and male parenthood are correlated, whereas recessive genes and female parenthood are correlated.

Please note that I am not encouraging or advocating for white men to beget mulattoes, or any other type of mestizos, by alluding to this peculiar phenomenon.
I am merely suggesting, perhaps indirectly, how immensely valuable racially awakened young white women are, especially in terms of reproduction.

Finally, I would like to manifest my trust in Tanstaafl.
A confidence that his strong example as a white father, will result in his children wishing to grow up to be assets rather than liabilities for the cause of Aryan awakening.

I look forward to listening to your podcasts and hearing more of your ideas regarding White European survival.