>>Schopenhauer is right when he says that people who have little reason to be proud of in their personal life often resort to “national pride” as a means of compensation. But on reflection, what is actually wrong with that? Isn’t it natural that the vast majority of any ethnic group consists of unremarkable people? No great scientists, artists, philosophers or statesmen, just ordinary folk? But being proud of one’s own group means being proud of its greatest achievements and being inspired by its greatest men and I think that is a positive thing.In this way the masses are lifted upon a higher plane than their daily existence. Since man is a social being and gifted individuals are far and between, this is the mechanism by which the masses evolve.<< (End quote)

An excellent, excellent point; this statement alone carries the power (i.e. plain common sense) to silence those anti-whites against our cause for European survival & perpetuation.

The multi-culturalist viewpoint is gradually running out of oxygen. What can only come next is a new pan-European breath.

Franklin, I believe your 'reflection' is of absolute importance in the understanding of what is going on in this world. We can look at any issue and see it positively or negatively, and that is why Jewish ownership of the media is so criminal. You simply took the Schopenhauer quote and merely stated the obvious (as in the emperor has no clothes) and properly refuted his negative perception and put it into a positive!

I believe one of our founding fathers also had a similar quote concerning nationalists being scoundrels, and they were before Schopenhauer. And anyone reading about Schopenhauer can see that he was a truly negative person. In no way would he be a leader of men.

If he is the epitome of an articulate intellectual, I am proudly a scoundrel.

This is silly. It means he feels it’s even wrong to be proud of his own children. They aren’t skills either. They are indeed fucking genetic accidents…

Being proud of your children (immediate family) is not too different from being proud of your people (extended family) in an evolutionary sense. It’s entirely normal, adaptive and moral.

Thanks Tan, and succes with the show!

As for White Pride being frowned upon, while any other ethnic pride is actively encouraged, that is the typical double standard that is part and parcel of “anti-racism” which is only code for “anti-white”.
Anti-White activism is not an attempt to curb socalled white “racism” or “supremacism” ( which hardly exist anymore), not even to rectify historical wrongs, it is aimed at the dispossession and eventual genocide of Whites themselves. Reason the more for Whites to insist on the right of White Pride, Jews, cultural Marxists and non-Whites suffering from inferiority complexes be damned.

The advantage of White Pride of course is that it can be based on substantial claims. While other races such as Blacks have to resort to fictitious claims such as “Black inventions” or that the ancient Egyptians were Black, Whites don’t need such capers : nearly 90% of the world’s civilizations were created by Whites.

On the subject of discussion, I have one other observation. I think it is important not to waste the hosts’ time. It is a huge amount of work to research, and to be an ongoing serious student (i.e. one who studies, not merely one who is enrolled somewhere). And to produce a show, and to stay in the flow of all the facts and important ideas. So always remember, anything that sidetracks the hosts makes it harder for them to do that most important thing: make great shows. Shows are what influence. Shows are downloaded and played. Comments are useful to an extent, but not when they become a distraction. $0.02.

I was reminded of this fun idea by the notion of the White student union. Their big problem will be Jews, even if they don’t know it. Jews look like us (to some extent) but have no loyalty to us.