Comments on: Interview with VOR’s Dietrich and Mishko /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/ Whites Talking to Whites About White Interests Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:47:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: Carolyn /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2075 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:51:51 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2075 The White Network is also forbidden. As is Carolyn Yeager, and I could probably come up with quite a few more.

]]>
By: Chechar /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2064 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:17:01 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2064 Carolyn,

I wouldn’t even try. A truly open debate on homosexuality is perhaps the only forbidden topic at CC.

]]>
By: Carolyn /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2034 Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:05:27 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2034 Excellent point, and no doubt true. Chechar should check it out by writing one.

]]>
By: Hawke /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2031 Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:24:12 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2031 I’ve visited the comment thread of James’ most recent article at CC and it bothers me that there are no comments harshly critical of this intellectual apology of homosexuality.

That might be because none are allowed.

]]>
By: Chechar /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2029 Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:40:29 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2029 P.S.

I’ve visited the comment thread of James’ most recent article at CC and it bothers me that there are no comments harshly critical of this intellectual apology of homosexuality. What a shame, especially comments such as “Best article I’ve read on here, to date” and recommendations to “watch again” Fight Club: an extremely nihilistic and degenerate movie based upon a degenerate novel by a homo.

Will these libertine guys save the white race from extinction?

]]>
By: Chechar /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2014 Sat, 22 Sep 2012 04:04:56 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2014 What struck me the most in my reading of De Profundis is that through his turbulent conflict with his boyfriend Alfred Dougles (“Bosie”) Oscar Wilde behaved like Bosie’s dog. Read De Profundis! Wilde himself was ashamed of himself.

I don’t get James O’Meara. His philosophy of hedonistic leisure is exactly the opposite of the facts as to the Germanic peoples’ severe, hardworking families (see e.g., Wm. Pierce’s excerpts on the subject). Since these pre-Christian Germanics did not tolerate homosexuality their history gives the lie that, as James claims, homophobia was a Judeo-Christian import.

]]>
By: Carl /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2010 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:16:58 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2010 Leisure, The Basis of Culture, by Josef Pieper, 1952. It’s the one they mention in your quote, above.

]]>
By: Mary /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2009 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:01:36 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2009 There is a clear line drawn here, and every White racialist needs to decide which side he is on.

Amen to that Carolyn, and thanks to you, Tan and other good folks about the place, that line has never seemed so clear.

]]>
By: Carolyn /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-2000 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:20:01 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-2000 Carl – could you tell us what book you mean?

]]>
By: Carl /2012/09/11/interview-with-vors-dietrich-and-mishko/#comment-1989 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:21:23 +0000 /?p=1481#comment-1989 I’m pretty sure they are misusing the concept that leisure is the basis of culture. I have that book right here. A taste, p. 57: “The point and the justification of leisure are not that the funcionary should function faultlessly and without a breakdown, but that the functionary should continue to be a man–and that means that he should not be wholly absorbed in the clear-cut milieu of his strictly limited function; the point is also that he should continue to be capable of seeing life as a whole and the world as a whole; that he should fulfil himself, and come to full possession of his faculties, face to face with being as a whole.” How homosexuality could possibly be part of such a program of fulfillment is beyond my grasp.

]]>