Comments on: Homosexual circumcision, pornography and the power of sex /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/ Whites Talking to Whites About White Interests Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:47:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: katana /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2785 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:59:25 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2785 Hadding
October 12, 2012 at 10:41 pm

Overriding the Free Will of another being is a “NoNo” in all religions or advanced forms of spirituality !

This strikes me as rubbish. Certainly this is the way New Agers think, but in reality overriding the free will of others is inherent in life. Schopenhauer even made this kind of violence the central principle of his philosophy. Trying never to violate the free will of another, in a world where conflict is inherent and unavoidable, ultimately means not surviving.

——————-

Hadding, you are quite right. We don’t live in a new age where sheep can sweet talk the wolves into vegetarianism and place garlands of flowers around their necks.
The human race does have its ‘wolves’, aka psychopaths who come to be in dominate positions in society. Today, our main wolves of concern consist of organized jewery.

They are busy destroying White societies through various means not excluding the spreading of New Age type philosophy.

]]>
By: Joshua /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2782 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:13:01 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2782 Hadding. If you overrode my free will, I would respond appropriately, and you might not like it too much ! Governments backed by intimidating force do it all the time, but that does not make it OK. My point was that an infant has free will. I don’t see any infant wanting to be circumcised. Free will has nothing to do with doing what you like at others’ expense. No one has the right to infringe upon the free will of another. You appear to me to be saying in order to survive you can steal for example. Free Will existed long before there was any “New Age” ! If I look at my life I don’t see anywhere where I infringe on anyone else’s free will. But I have no children and so do not yet have experience of dealing with a child’s Willfulness !
You are right in one respect. I should have removed the words “all religions or”

]]>
By: Hadding /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2775 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:41:11 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2775

Overriding the Free Will of another being is a “NoNo” in all religions or advanced forms of spirituality !

This strikes me as rubbish. Certainly this is the way New Agers think, but in reality overriding the free will of others is inherent in life. Schopenhauer even made this kind of violence the central principle of his philosophy. Trying never to violate the free will of another, in a world where conflict is inherent and unavoidable, ultimately means not surviving.

]]>
By: Joshua /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2767 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:46:20 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2767 Carolyn well done coming up with this Demon (he looks like one doesn’t he !) Nowhere on his web site does he use the words “FREE WILL.” The kind of words he does use are for example, “FORMULATION OF AFFIRMATIVE CIRCUMCISION”. This is the kind of language that could be straight out of the Frankfurt School and would get its full approval.

Overriding the Free Will of another being is a “NoNo” in all religions or advanced forms of spirituality !
This is a great stanza from Khalil Gabran (“The Prophet”)……..

“And a woman who held a babe against her bosom said, “Speak to us of Children.”
And he said:
‘Your children are not your children.
They are the sons and daughters of Life’s longing for itself.
They come through you but not from you,
And though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.

You may give them your love but not your thoughts.
For they have their own thoughts.
You may house their bodies but not their souls,
For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.
You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.”

]]>
By: Beth /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2685 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:54:51 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2685 Carolyn, I’d have to search around for articles deconstructing, or critical of ‘net porn which are themselves “respectable” sources. I can’t imagine a given “free porn tube” site somehow grabbing your email addy without you providing it somewhere- so if you want to check this vast ‘net red light district for “research purposes”, add dot com to xvideos, redtube, xhamster, drtuber- just to name a few. Use a program like free CCleaner to delete all cookies etc after your “research”. Notice the thumbnails which animate when you mouseover- even youtube doesn’t do that! And the keyword search windows, “categories” pages etc. All slick, labor intensive, bandwidth intensive. And all “free”. Click and they open a page & the vid plays. So what is the means of support for these operations again?!!? I suggest, it’s ultimately the taxpayers, as these sites are psy-ops.

Couple articles, both “compromised” sources: joo-run dailymail.uk, and an article by jewish-canadian holohoax-truth-denier Henry Makow:

“How internet porn turned my beautiful boy into a hollow, self-hating shell”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2132342/How-internet-porn-turned-beautiful-boy-hollow-self-hating-shell.html

“Porn Shackles Society More than Patriot Act ”
http://www.henrymakow.com/porn_in_the_war_against_you.html

You mentioned you planned to do something on the “elite pedophilia” underworld in future show(s)- remember this story? The rabbit hole obviously runs deep!

“5200 Pentagon Employees PURCHASED Child Pornography!”
http://www.google.com/search?q=5200+Pentagon+Employees+PURCHASED+Child+Pornography!

UK Patriot Brian Gerrish does a lot of exposure work re this dark reality among the “elite”- which involves the fate of children taken from their families by the state for bogus/fabricated reasons. Franklin Scandal? Holly Greig?
http://www.google.com/search?q=brian+gerrish+pedophil*

]]>
By: Carolyn /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2681 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:35:11 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2681 Thanks, Beth, for that link to the E. Michael Jones interview. It was a good one. He is always such a clear speaker.

I don’t know anything about the free porn-tube sites. I stay away from ever clicking on anything like that because I don’t want to end up with it coming into my email box. Is there a place to read “about it” without going to it?

]]>
By: Carl /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2679 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:08:50 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2679 Hadding, thanks for the link to GirlWritesWhat. I think her point is, in more detail, the one I was hinting at. The unintended consequence of making wage-earners (e.g. male ones) support ‘families’ instead of their own families is that unique maleness is further reduced. It would end even the role of provider even if the economy returns to some degree of normalcy. Her point is that a variety of phenomena are ending the man’s opportunity to form a male identity for himself, hence they are sort of failing and refusing to go along with things. GWW has given these topics a lot of thought, and might make a very engaging Saturday Afternoon guest.

]]>
By: Carl /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2677 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:17:44 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2677 Fascinating. Sexual vs. racial competition. One thought I’ve had is that the White Nationalist movement includes a certain percentage of misfits, insofar as being a White Nationalist is socially impermissible. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws have guns. (Comparison.) So if the movement attracts a high percentage of misfits, this makes women feel uncomfortable. Also misfits can’t always reason all that well. Their mental models may be more simplistic.

]]>
By: Hadding /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2676 Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:03:51 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2676

They are mostly by what appear to be men. And you think “she” is a man, so what does that say about your gripe against females getting too much consideration … again?

It shows that some males might rather be female because of the privileged treatment.

Ultimately of course the current overly privileged status of women has to be the fault of men who have allowed the women to have it, like the Republicans who gave women the vote because of the false expectation that this would secure the women’s vote for Republicans. But this doesn’t negate the fact that women who don’t appreciate their overprivileged status and continue making feminist complaints are annoying as hell. I don’t hate the little darlings but they need to get a clue about when they are demanding too much.

I really like GirlWritesWhat’s elucidations of women’s overprivileged status. It’s exactly what I see.

]]>
By: Carolyn /2012/10/09/homosexual-circumcision-pornography-and-the-power-of-sex/#comment-2672 Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:10:33 +0000 /?p=2041#comment-2672 Hadding – I hate to have to approve this comment. While I don’t like a lot of Darkmoon’s material myself (I do think this latest pornography article was quite good), I like the comments at her site even less! They are mostly by what appear to be men. And you think “she” is a man, so what does that say about your gripe against females getting too much consideration … again?

I have to remind you that it’s not females who are responsible for decisions at TOO. Wouldn’t that be Dr. MacDonald in the final analysis? And other men who run it? Maybe they have a wrong idea of when to be chivalrous. Anyway, your comment belongs there, not here.

Do you think I get special courtesy from people? Well, women have not for the most part gotten into the habit of male locker-room language so maybe that is natural and right. This is part of what’s considered civilized society.

]]>