Comments on: White America at the Crossroad

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:59:09 +0000

Attacking Dr. MacDonald?? They are attacking everyone! And showing a photo that has nothing to do with anyone they mention. You, John, seem to be a huge MacDonald fan.

By: John McGhee

John McGhee — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:57:28 +0000

The Awakening article from Foriegn Policy attacking Dr. MacDonald. It is long but worth the read.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/11/12/the_awakening

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:49:58 +0000

Rick said:

“White Advocate” is a good term for those who are focused on trying to further the interests of Whites within current society and who are trying to make Whites more ethnocentric.

That is true, but it is not possible to further the interests of Whites while remaining within a society of blacks and browns, run by Jews, with the birthrate totally against us. Thus, what is impossible should not be advised.

Franklin said:

Your aim should not be to be “accepted” by your enemies, your aim should be to create followers against your enemies. The A3P has all the qualities for a future failure if it accepts a weak “implicit” pro-White stance as its policy. You cannot win an existential battle with a halfhearted attitude.

Well said. We need to remember this is a battle for existence, not simply a need to get a share of the pie. By agreeing to allow others to get a share of our pie, beginning in the 1960’s, we now have lost control of the pie altogether. The lesson to take from that is the need for separatism, not fairness or “let us reason together” … as some are suggesting we reason with Blacks to convince them that they are better off with us than with the growing Mestizo population. It’s like Hitler making allies of certain Arabs and even some eastern and southern Europeans. In the end, they didn’t do him a damn bit of good because they so easily turn tail. Like Attracts Like is the meme to live by.

By: Franklin Ryckaert

Franklin Ryckaert — Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:25:35 +0000

You cannot be a pro-White party without being explicitly pro-White. You will be called a "racist" and an "anti-Semite" anyway, even if you only implicitly advocate pro-White policies, if that is your greatest fear. Don't try to be "acceptable" in an anti-White environment. Ultimately that means that you give up your principles and gain nothing. Your aim should not be to be "accepted" by your enemies, your aim should be to create followers against your enemies. The A3P has all the qualities for a future failure if it accepts a weak "implicit" pro-White stance as its policy. You cannot win an existential battle with a halfhearted attitude.

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:30:33 +0000

I think Dr. MacDonald would be great as a host/presenter, for a weekly 30- or 60-minute show. Perhaps he would feel at home, and, given his background knowledge, his presentation would not feel superficial, as if he just read something we ought to read. But by contrast, I don’t think the recent candidates for A3P would be so great as hosts, or guests really, because they are so eager to claim they know nothing about the Jews, and to disclaim any notion that they are racist or antisemitic or ‘anything like that’.

By: Rick1

Rick1 — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:45:21 +0000

Great to have Prof MacDonald on the show.

“White Advocate” is a good term for those who are focused on trying to further the interests of Whites within current society and who are trying to make Whites more ethnocentric.

“White Nationalist” is better for someone explicitly working on creating a White ethnostate.

There is a lot of overlap but some people, like Derbyshire with his Chinese wife, would probably be White Advocates rather than White Nationalists.

By: Mary, White Advocate

Mary, White Advocate — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:44:56 +0000

Dr. Kevin MacDonald hit a home run and scored a touchdown, both at the same time. He has correctly nailed down the reasons for the decline in both our culture and people ever since the passage of the Civil Rights and Immigration Reform Acts back in that era on insanity, the 60s (which, unfortunately, became endemic and continues to this day).

I would love to be able to listen to a whole series of lectures by Dr. MacDonald availabe in the same format as The Great Courses

By: Alexander from Flanders

Alexander from Flanders — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:18:20 +0000

Very good show. Professor MacDonald scored point after point whenever he spoke. He truly is a brave and intelligent man.

I give this show a rating of: 10/10

Although I have to agree with John McGhee; 2 hours of Kevin MacDonald sure sounds good to me. And 8 hours would be even better. 🙂

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:20:43 +0000

John, of course I invited him for the full show but gave him the option to do only one hour, which he preferred. You write to him and urge him back for two hours. 🙂

By: John McGhee

John McGhee — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:08:24 +0000

Please Carolyn invite Professor MacDonald on one of your shows for the full two hours next time. He makes so much sense about the peril we as a people are in.

He is the CBS/KCAL recent report on KMAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kwfrFNYioE