As to Yoko Ono, she was a powerful woman, as she continued to exhibit later — which just showed that John Lennon was not a powerful man, but a rather weak one … as a man. A truly talented song-writer yes, –WELL, AN ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT, A LOVER NOT A FIGHTER — but rather impotent otherwise. That’s my view.

I believe, O,K I KNOW (from a informed sociological observation of current British angst) that all British middle-class school boys were, have been and are unconsciously conflicted by years of conditioning by their Upper Class Betters. Those that aren’t conflicted, become the backbone of the system, growing up to become those grey men (tyranny of the clerks) of the patriotic type, or tools of the Empire that went of twice to kill the Jerries for the honor of the Empire.

The gals too, although they are more adaptable and less prone to radical violence than their English Boyfriends, but therefore much more in tune to the values and necessities of the home and hearth, have been completely sublimated into the Greatness of the British Hive Mentality, psychologically speaking, and unfortunately, the chickens have come home to roost.

Yes, absolutely, wussie stuff, at the psycho-social level for the whole English Speaking Word’ The truth of the matter, psychologically, was that “Young John” was conflicted and tramatized early one which helped feed his poetry, became sexually active early in life, even before his marriage to Cynthia, (which I am sure gave him a bit of a “creative” edge in his song writing, i.e. emotionally able to wow the teenyboppers with his smooth sophistication) and became more conflicted as he and all of the Beattle became more public people, the fact became, that people actually wanted to know what the lads “thought” about things, handlers be damned.

Dr. John Coleman (an ex-MI5 man and British expatriate) calls the Beattle’s: A Tavistoc PsyOp, and this makes perfect sense to me after following this particular thread. Let me explain:

1. Does anyone remember the b & w TV coverage of British young people (Mod’s and Rockers’s)a-rioting and a-burning in the streets at a the time before the British music scene got legs (late 50’s, early 60’s?)?The SCENE (i.e., BBC involvement, top of the pops, various bands brought out and then “puffed”, groomed and played on radio) stared out over there following this civil unrest.The so-called “Mod’s” and the so-called “Rockers” were doing pitched running warfare against each other, much like the US anti-war riots in the US in the late sixties. But these were disaffected British Kids in the aftermath of the loss of the British Empire willing to bugger the rulers and burn the cities! Thus, a PsyOp of a major scope and scale, by an already tongue-in-check talmudized brit establishment, had been authorized by HM’s Government (social engineering branch)to completely hypnotize and encourage through the new magic medium of television, the tried and true propaganda arm of the BBC and the Press, to calm the wretched proletariat, latter magicly evolving into an hipster cash cow and subsidized money machine.

2. What better way to take some of the energy away for those that might question the real history of the British infamy in the late war with the German Reich than a little bit of foolishness to turn the head of a whole generation of English Speaking Teenagers and their parents.

3. When the Boy’s started to understand that they were highly paid role-player’s in this ongoing piece of English Language mind control, they started to send out sublimated messages (rebelling through drugs, occult practice, experimental psychological and social memes, if you will) resulting in the bands late albums, John’s loss of grip on reality (his “God”/”Christ” complex if you will) his hook up with Oh No and total liberated idiot behavior in the prime time media cesspool.

4. Other groups, Zep, Floyd, Cream, et.al. that came out of the far end of that evolution of the PsyOp were even better draws, as the weirdness became, well, total bazarre, as the witches and werewolves were incarnating to the occult practices of what became an American Funded Occult Art Colony of London, with assorted piss-ant want-a-be devil possessed spin off turd bots in the US counter culture marked of marginally talented and intellectually challenged (compared to the British standard (sic.)) of Jewish Oriented freaks and, oh yes, the very, very musical black folks.

The British upper-class has been Jew-ridden for the better part of 300 years, having in the meantime compromised the Empire to the total destruction of the British Folk and middle-class, and the Royal Family, are wondering what God Hath Wrought. All Things Must Pass, Sunshine Superman!

I brought circumcision into the discussion because this is one way, perhaps the worst, way in which the Jewish cult has spread its malignant influence over our folk, especially here in the USA. I strongly believe this is only one way in which the Zhid (Russian slang for Jew) has infected our society and culture.

Robert, you are right about bringing the Jewish control of the music and entertainment industry to our attention. It is now almost impossible for a musician or song writer to get any exposure and earn a living without a Jew behind him or her.

There are some things I do admire about the Koreans, such as during the Los Angeles ‘Rodney King’ riots, the Korean Americans defended their businesses by arming themselves with rifles and driving off many of the rioting Blacks. They are a hard working group of people and start many small businesses. The car industry is becoming world renown and a point of national pride. They sent troops to Vietnam in support of the US. They were fierce fighters and were known to actually take ‘scalps’ of the communists and hang them to the outside of their camp’s tents. The Viet Cong supposedly chose to stay away from them.

However, in the orient, there is a racial pecking order just like anywhere else in the world, with the Japanese being the top dog, followed by the Chinese, and then the Koreans. After that, the south-eastern Asian countries such as the Vietnamese, Burmese, Cambodians, Laotians, etc, are not given the same stature, and for good reason.

As far as submissive wives… I did not see it in the mixed marriages that I observed. But I wound not advise any man to marry a woman that would not submit to his authority. And that is biblical. I also would not suggest a woman marrying a man that would not love her as Jesus loved the church. That too is biblical. Life is a two way street, even though the feminists here in this comment section do not comprehend that with their hatred and hysteria.

Stay with your own kind!!!

Real men do not need to think that they have to “pop” their wives to keep “peace” in the family and real women do not behave in such a manner that a man would show hostility towards her. As a woman, I look up to and respect men who are protectors and leaders of our Northern European (Nordic, Teutonic, Slavic and Celtic) peoples

It might help you and others to understand that the wife who threw a clock at Robert while he was holding their baby (according to his story) was Korean. We are usually led to believe that only White women do things like that! It is my opinion that usually when White men marry Asian (and Mexican and other non-white women) it’s so they can play the big boss and enjoy more or less submissive wives. It is not intended to be a marriage of equality in the tradition of our, as you say, Northern European people. But these women do not always turn out to be so submissive after the marriage vows. 🙂

And here I thought you were through with me Mary? And let me restate my thoughts for you again so we are absolutely clear on this: I believe with all my heart that a man was made bigger, stronger, and faster, in order to keep peace in the family. Because of this 'threat' that is inherent in the proper family (less government interference with its Jewish, feminist, atheistic propensities), in most cases no violence would ever be needed. Peace reigns.

You can ask the men in your life (if you have any) if they would think back to their childhood, and admit that when dad was gone to work, we took advantage of dear old mom and could get ornery. Come closer to dinnertime, when dad would be coming home, our behavior would improve so mom wouldn't tell on us and we'd not risk getting a whooping (oh yeah, even a 'pop').

Somehow 'circumcision' got into this discussion? Never heard a song about that subject yet.

I have a theory as to why men in the USA are such a bunch of weaklings, eager to be led like docile cattle.

A major part of the destructive process of feminization is the promotion of circumcision, not just for Jewish baby boys, but for ALL babies born in US hospitals.

Carolyn has spoken out against male infant circumcision and for that I want to award her some kind of medal as this procedure is nothing more and nothing less than a sex crime against children and should be persecuted with jail sentences of not less than 25 years to life. One of the severest crimes carried out by the Jews, if not the worst, is the strong encouragement, if not literal enforcement, of male circumcision in the United States, especially since World War II with over 70% of the US male population having been and being circumcised.

The Jews and their gentile sycophants are responsible for this cruelty against children as they are the ones promoting genital mutilation of little boys by telling new mothers that it is “more sanitary” plus other flimsy invalid excuses. Most American mothers, still groggy from the medications given during childbirth in the typical US hospital maternity ward, are handed a paper with the word, “Phimosis” (Greek for narrow strait) across the top or even “Circumcision consent form” or other words to that effect. Because there is a good chance that the woman’s husband was circumcised, she scribbles her signature on the form and her son is circumcised with an additional $200-$600 added to the hospital bill.

One reason the Jews enforced infant male circumcision is that, throughout history, this was the one way that the Jew could be differentiated from the rest of the population in Europe (and elsewhere). We know that the Jews have been expelled from every European country, city state, kingdom, duchy, etc., at least once every one hundred years and one sure way to tell Jew from Non-Jew was male circumcision. Of course, one won’t find this in any history books because Jews control the media that includes textbook (and other) publishing firms. I learned it from eye-witness accounts of the “inspections” for “Pediculosis Pubis” (pubic lice) where the German soldiers in Poland and Russia had all the men drop their trousers and under-drawers. The men who were not circumcised were often allowed to go, while the Jews were stripped and, well, we all know the rest. I heard several accounts from Russians (my daughters’ father was Russian) who told me how they were spared because they were not circumcised. And this procedure was brought to the United States by the Jews so that any future “inspections” would not be feasible as too many non-Jewish men had been mutilated.

Aside from physical appearance and physical effects such as discomfort due to exposure of an area of raw mucous to the outside environment, one can imagine the devastating psychological effect this must have on the average male. One can only imagine how a man must feel, discovering that a very private part of his body had been permanently disfigured. I have read accounts of where men think that their very masculinity has been violated, and, indeed, it has. No wonder circumcised men feel as though they had been feminized. One can only imagine that a man considers himself not a real man as part of his very manly identity has been taken away from him. No wonder men in American are such “wusses!” I am certain that this feminization of men is all part of the plan; the ancient Hebrew slaves were circumcised, like their masters and what are we to the Jew, “goyim” (cattle) or slaves.

I have been told that some men are so angry at their mothers for signing that permission form that they consider matricide! Several men of my acquaintance are completely alienated from their families because their moms allowed them to be circumcised. Others become quite defensive and claim, “lots of men are circumcised,” forgetting or not knowing that, outside of the predominantly Muslim countries and Israel, the USA is the only place where the majority of males are circumcised. In fact, I even heard one man, who was so insanely jealous of uncircumcised men, proclaim that “every man ought to be circumcised” so that, I would assume, all men are forced to share the misery.

And Brit, my contact info is on the introductory page of “Rockin’ the Music World” and I answer all e-mails and telephone calls.

Carl, you are right that in a sense, the issue is not man vs woman. But consider this… if a man attacked me like my ex did 24 years ago, he would have been stopped. Had I stopped my ex, I would have gone to jail. So I hope you can understand, there is a difference.

We can see with the huge power now of this socialist state, women have spun their own trap in the stranglehold of the White male in ‘his’ house. Now we have a rampant out of control divorce rate that has created a living hell for our kids. With a strong male presence in the family, peace is established. Boys don’t contest dad because he is bigger and stronger. That same boy runs wild with the single mom that he knows cannot physically do anything about his bad behavior. Yes, he is bigger and stronger, and for a good reason.

And thanks for the continuing support Katana. I will get my show on somewhere as “my wife wants me to do it.” Hmmm… I married well. Now where’s that paddle?