I have tried numerous times to comment on this episode,but I end up ranting and lecturing about the origins, horrors and prophesies of Christianity and the bible.

So I will just say that I don’t think Christianity belongs in the White Nationalist movement.Even if we rewrite the bible,make Jesus a White man and replace “Greater Israel” with an Aryan promised land.The bible does not fit in with the survival of our race.

The bible is Jewish Nationalism,judaised astrotheology and judaised paganism.It is an alien religion.It is not for the White man.

White people had their own religions and Gods until the Christians killed them. As a White Nationalist,I believe we should rediscover our pagan religions and our pagan Gods. Otherwise our white nations will not be fully realized,but be forever judaised.

I have tried to E-mail you many times Carolyn at @carolynyeager.com and @carolynyeager.net but I cannot connect to you for some reason.

You are doing excellent work Carolyn.Keep it up.

Most students of ancient literature are not accustomed to considering that it was written by White people. Can you give us an overview of ancient literature with a view to clarifying its authorship?

Are any non-White essays of use to us?

You say that some essential ideas for our race are found in the literature that turns out to be ours. Are there ideas that are incorrect as well?

Many people assume that the area in northern Africa and the middle east were not White, but swarthy. What can you tell us about White population movements over time? Why should we believe that those areas were places where we lived?

Interpreting the Bible through a racial lens seems novel. Why should we do that, and why should we trust your methods?

Why can’t we believe in creation itself and bypass any ideas that require belief, or examination of the unseen?

Religion usually involves some kind of beliefs, including a narrative about things we cannot directly verify. Can you tell us what you believe happened to bring us, and other people, about, and what God’s purpose must be? What is the point of it all? And what if Whites don’t agree about the narrative?

Which came first: Christianity or morality?

Why racialize Christianity? Wouldn’t it be better to focus on what Whites can all agree on?

What has been the Jewish influence on the self-knowledge of White people, especially in the area of religion?

Introduce us to the Bible, especially for those of us, such as Voltaire, who regard it as unreliable history, superstition, risible, and hopelessly murky.

How can we think intelligently about how God regards race? Why must we think about it at all?

Discuss for us the best way to reason about the religious stances of various famous leaders, such as Hitler, Jefferson, Lincoln, or any other non-Jewish notable. We always seem to get stuck on what we mean by “Christianity”.

You recently said that a principal idea in our racial literature is transcendence. How is this idea distorted by Jews and other non-Whites? How should we integrate the idea of transcendence into our thinking?

I think asking Mr. Finck about faith would be a very good idea. For example, what exactly are we supposed to have faith in? I think that the answer from CI is that we have been punished by not being aware of our true identity. We were to forget our identity for many centuries. I mean, God could just make the whole thing bloody obvious, but that wouldn’t be much of a test for us, after our sins of race-mixing early on. Basically what God wants is for us to “come out of her, my people”, meaning out of the non-Adamite people. And of course we refuse. We trade short-term benefits and ignore long-term costs.

If you are suspicious about Paul/Saul, you would be interested in Mr. Finck’s current series about the “Paul bashers”.

My opinion is that, if it is true, CI is the last stage of waking up. First you realize that we don’t really enjoy self-determination as a people any more. Well, first you realize that the government doesn’t behave reasonably. Then you start to see through conspiracies, which leads you to “who” questions. From there you can see that the “who” questions apply to many other situations, and you become Jew/racially aware. Eventually you see that the “who” questions point right back to you, and who you are. That’s CI. If it’s true. I am impressed by the solidity of the research and the completeness of the viewpoint. Keep in mind that White people long held the Bible in high esteem. It’s only recently, with a lot of coincidental Jewish influence, that Whites have the notion that maybe it’s just a lot of superstition.

And our helplessness in seeing the locusts devour our land and children is amply projected in the unreliable Old Testament.

It might be a good idea to outline twenty questions for Mr. Finck, and see if he will agree to come on and answer them, perhaps in a special program titled “Christian Identity: Useful Paradigm, Wishful Thinking, or Irrelevant Mischief?”

I liked it when Mister Finck said that many people are christian without realizing it.

Yes, he said that Hadding might be a good Christian, which would be a big surprise to me, since I totally distrust the Bible. I think that a man named Jesus may have lived, and he may have been crucified because of Jewish agitation, but I doubt that all the alleged details of his life and all the words attributed to him in the Gospels are accurate, and I definitely am suspicious of Saul-Paul’s motives. The Old Testament for various reasons has even less credibility as an historical record. I agree with Voltaire, who found the Old Testament non-credible as history and the heroes of that storybook not even particularly admirable. http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2010/10/voltaire-on-history-of-jews.html I also agree with Schopenhauer, that Christian doctrine carries a heavy influence from Platonism (and its derivatives like Stoicism).

If I can be “a good Christian” despite thinking that way, then obviously Hitler could be one too. It was always my understanding that the New Testament contained some demand for faith in certain claims (not just living in a way that is consistent with the widespread form of morality that Christianity happens to share), but maybe I was wrong about that….

I personally HATE the church (the institution). Yet; I like William Finck, and I have respect for him and for what he is trying to do. Isn’t that strange? I liked it when Mister Finck said that many people are christian without realizing it. And that the rituals are basically not christian. I really like that.

As a young teen I was heavily involved in the black metal movement (during the 90’s, and I still listen to the music). The more I learned of what the church had done in Europe through the centuries…the more I hated them. I also became a serious racialist at that time.

Today I can deal with “racial christians” (if they can respect my beliefs, and accept the fact that I will not join their religion, not ever), but I despise the average -zombie- christian. I don’t know if that makes any sense, but there you have it.

I also want to say that I’m part German, and that even my Flemish family was heavily involved with NS during WW2. Now my Flemish grandmother (almost 90 years old), who was a nurse in Germany (she had to clean up after the bombardments, worked with wounded soldiers, her German partner died in combat: lot’s of interesting stories in my family), she has the same attitude towards christianity as Mister Finck when it comes to the rituals. She hates the organized church, and she always says that those priest guys know nothing.

PS. Here is a link to a organisation in my country that studies our ancient pre-christian beliefs and traditions:

http://www.hagal.be

Here is German group:

http://asatru.de/nz/

Here are some English articles from Asatru:

http://asatru.de/nz/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=4&Itemid=22

Here is a site of a famous black metal artiest and his interesting views:

http://www.burzum.org/eng/news.shtml