Comments on: An Investigation into a ‘Holocaust’ Blogger /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/ Whites Talking to Whites About White Interests Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:47:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: Carolyn /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12652 Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:04:31 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12652

Any offence language and comments (by you)or others are removed by the censor, I have not introduced any restriction what-so-ever.

As you can see from my copy of my comment, there is no offensive language in it. One can also see there are hardly any comments to your entries, which might suggest it is very difficult to register a comment at your site.

Material I used can be obtained from official sources of the Cultural Department of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Are you expecting readers to accept that as God’s Truth? The Federal Republic of Germany is not even a legal entity; it is a construct put in place by the Americans, mainly. It answers to the US government which has never concluded a peace treaty with the Third Reich; if it did it would be confirming that the Third Reich was a legal (not a criminal) constitutional entity.

The Federal Republic admits it has justification only by the decisions of the War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1946-47, by foreign powers, not by the people of Germany. It admits that its whole reason to be is the “Holocaust.” So why are you helping it to exist in its present form? There’s a good question for you to answer.

You throw around titles like “Der Ort des Terrors” thinking to impress people, but it’s just more lies. And just because you have found those pictures on the Internet with such captions doesn’t mean the captions are right. So much for your self-vaunted RESEARCH. You don’t do any!

]]>
By: Herbert Stolpmann /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12647 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:40:57 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12647 The Right of Reply:
Any offence language and comments (by you)or others are removed by the censor, I have not introduced any restriction what-so-ever. Material I used can be obtained from official sources of the Cultural Department of the Federal Republic of Germany. Identical comments are published in “Der Ort des Terrors” which I mainly used and translated. All pictures shown are available on the internet with the appropriate captions. I made no changes to them.
Herb

]]>
By: Carolyn /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12609 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:27:31 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12609 I tried to leave a comment to Herb Stolpmann’s latest post at his Blog: http://dachaukz.blogspot.com/2013/02/facts-and-figures-auschwitz.html. My comment was denied because “URL contains illegal characters.” There was no url; I just used my full name Carolyn Yeager. I removed the characters from the 3 urls I had used in my body copy, but that didn’t remove the denial. Herb seems to have all the security that is available in place while still showing the option of “comments.” He doesn’t want them. This is my comment:

This is a huge amount of information you have posted here under the heading FACTS AND FIGURES – AUSCHWITZ

But where do your ‘facts’ come from? You begin with this web site: http://remember.org/camps/birkenau/bir-introduction.html under INTRODUCTION AND PLAN
Within all the text, there is not a single source given for the “facts and figures” therein. Without that, what you write is not reliable; why should anyone believe it?

Further down, we come upon another link you give for FATE OF CIVILIAN BUNA MANAGEMENT The I.G. Farben Trial,
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben_Trial

Finally, you offer the “remember” web site again with a link under a section headed MEN’S CAMP (B Ib AND B IIb) BIRKENAU: http://www.remember.org/camps/birkenau/

Following this is still tons of text with no source for any of it. You obviously have the idea that “blogging” means you give your opinion and say whatever you want – even when dealing with historical subjects over which people GO TO PRISON! You are around 85 years old but seem not to care that you are being extremely irresponsible. You call this “your hobby.”

In addition you use photos irresponsibly. Just one example, under the section THIERENSTADT FAMILY CAMP, you label a picture of a train on a platform with a few men in suits calmly shaking hands with persons inside the train as “Departure of a train of German Jews being deported to Theresienstadt. Hanau, Germany, May 30, 1942.” This could be any train at any train station.

A second example is a picture that is a well-known fake/forgery: “Sonderkommando burning corpses” under the heading SURVIVAL. Close inspection reveals the “corpses” to be drawings of shapes without any anatomical likeness to human beings. This is a photo composite made from something being burned, but it wasn’t people – maybe clothing or refuse. Above this photo forgery the text reads:
“The fate of the prisoners in the Sonderkommando was unimaginable in the face of daily horrors at Auschwitz. Upon their arrival, young, strong men would be selected and were assigned to bring the victims out of the gas chambers and have them cremated after the removal of hair, the hidden jewellery and removal of gold teeth, dragged them into the crematory ovens or stacked them on pyres. They lived away from the other prisoners and were well fed and cared for, even provided with alcohol, up to the stage, before they were murdered themselves, as they knew too much and replaced by new workers.”
Below the picture it says: “Thus, the image is composed of the “Privileged” in Auschwitz from many facets. Because in addition to corruption, selfishness and cruelty, there was also this group of prisoners that showed empathy and humanity. The reports of the survivors of Auschwitz runs like a red thread through their internment that they have survived thanks to the help of fellow inmates. What percentage of prisoners existed, who used their pre-eminence for the good and sometimes jeopardising their own lives to save their fellow prisoners can not be determined. Nor can the number of Auschwitz ‘celebrity’ figures who survived the death camp and the evacuation of Auschwitz and the months until liberation who now live in other countries be counted.”
What fantasy. And not a word about the photo – it’s left to your reader’s imagination to interpret it as sondercommandos burning corpses that were simply laying on the ground.

You should correct your errors (although they are multitudinous) or don’t expect anyone to take you seriously.

]]>
By: Carolyn /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12504 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:10:19 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12504 I should have added that it was April 1945 before Willy Wenger, then 18 years old, was transported with his HJ comrades of the same age, now Wehrmacht soldiers, to the Seelow Heights, about 45 miles east of Berlin, where they were defending the line along the west bank of the Oder River. This is how close the front was now. Some disapproved of sending such young and inexperienced “boys” there, but there they were as, I suppose, they had no others. Wikipedia says:

During April 1945, the Battle of the Seelow Heights saw some of the heaviest fighting of World War II between the German defenders and the Soviet attackers. Many localized Soviet attacks were held back by remnants of the Wehrmacht. In the end, the Russians lost more men than the Germans, but the Soviet advances could not be held off for long. After several days of heavy fighting the Soviets managed to break through the defences and fight their way into the German capital in the Battle of Berlin.

]]>
By: Herbert Stolpmann /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12488 Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:01:03 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12488 Carolyn
I think it is about time that I sign off, as I mentioned before, we are poles apart, keep up your good work and I will do mine. Although some points you are making are valid.
Have a good day!
Herb

]]>
By: Carolyn /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12460 Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:51:16 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12460 Herb – “Regarding Quasar”

I removed the main part of your answer because it was just copy/paste from the link you provided. People can go there and read it. Looking over this site, I found it was credited to Mitch Williamson, a web designer. His email is doricwebdesign@gmail.com. He is, at least partly, advertising what a nice website he can create. This site is written from the point of view of the victors, or the Jews, but attempting to look “German.”

The age category of Hitlerjugend was 14-18. Those from 10 to 14 were Jungvolk. You said you were a member of the jungvolk but never the hitlerjugend; you were 17 when you were “conscripted” into a training program to train Volksturm (People’s resistance) in the use of the panzerfaust. The Volksturm was not part of the Wehrmacht, but an NS party organization, like the HJ and JV. My friend Willy Wenger (Austrian) was 17 also when his Hitlerjugend group was ordered to further training (they were already manning FLAK stations during breaks from school) and he was 18 by the time he found himself in a combat situation far from home, now a part of the real army. There were no younger members. I have his story which will be published soon; he tells all the details which you do not do.

Wikipedia states: “By 1945, the Volkssturm was commonly drafting 12-year-old Hitler Youth members into its ranks.” That’s a contradiction. It then only speaks of The Battle of Berlin which apparently was the last “Russian Front.” Hitler Youth formed part of the “last line of defense” even though “city commander, General Helmuth Weidling, ordered Axmann to disband the Hitler Youth combat formations.” Because of “confusion,” this order was not carried out. The only source of information for this entire WWII section on Wiki HJ is Hitler’s Young Tigers: The Chilling True Story of the Hitler Youth. London: Arrow Books, by Rupert Butler. Seems to be a cheap paperback written in 1986; no reviews at Amazon, plenty of used copies.

It’s clear enough to me that you don’t have much to tell from your own personal knowledge, mostly the long German names of regiments/units and organizations. It’s also clear you really despise Catholicism, in spite of marrying a woman brought up Catholic … re your comment about Ratzinger.

If you want to disagree with what I say here, feel free.

]]>
By: Carolyn /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12450 Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:54:24 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12450 Your answer to “what destroyed the Germany you loved” was the LOSS of the war and the Allies taking hunks of territory and giving to themselves and their friends. Yes? “Carving up the country.” East Prussia was gone and not allowed to exist again. A large slice of Eastern Germany was handed over to Poland, including where your family lived — from where they had done business with Polish Jews across the border. Is it they who expelled your family? All Germans were murdered or made into refugees, and these millions of refugees poured into the new German borders, putting a huge strain on all services, housing, etc. In addition, the division of the country into four zones administered by each victor country with it’s own rules, and the theft of whatever each one wanted to steal. There was no rule except the rule of the raider who retained all the weapons.

You don’t name Hitler as the cause. Your tranquility of life, even under the Hitler regime, was only “abruptly shattered with the disastrous treatment I and many others received during the unconditional surrender to the Allies.” If you understood (or paid attention to) how the plan to destroy the Germany you loved – in which you mention your and others prosperity was “due to hard work” – was hatched and developed over time by those two very competitive Anglo nations, England and America (with their Jewish advisers) — perhaps you might conjure up some patriotic feeling. But I think you are one who was easily persuaded to turn against your own and embrace and serve the new ruler. You were young and inexperienced. Because the only people who could give you something were a few American GI’s (since no German had anything to give) – even though it was no skin off their back, they had access to plenty – they became for you the “good guys.” Here’s how it works: First you take everything away from someone, then after a period of suffering you give them one little thing, then they see you as their benefactor. Then you give them a little more and they belong to you — you are the source of all good.

I think this is what happened to you. Your youth and inexperience didn’t allow you the necessary distance from which to view your plight. When you did survive and were released, the society was not what you expected. You wanted to return to the privileged world of the Americans. Yes, privileged in comparison to the German’s struggle for survival that was ordered and insisted upon by your new friends, the U.S. Military Command, with the approval of the civilian government.

The problem that Hitler had to deal with in uniting all Germans comes to the fore again in your admission that you Prussians made sure that a Bavarian (who was probably a Catholic and less Jew-friendly) couldn’t keep a job among your favored ranks.

Then you say: “To go back into a community that has not changed for the better” … is this a reference to German people needing to be “improved,” as was the official idea of the denazification program (there’s the word nazi again) and other propaganda programs? This is really the crux of the matter. When did you adopt the American, and Jewish, version of the murder of 6 million Jews in gas chambers; the brutality by the SS in the concentration camps, the total evil of the National Socialist regime? Or at least of Himmler. When and how did this take hold? Right away? You were at Dachau during the time of those SS and “German war criminals” trials, weren’t you? Did you never doubt? Never want to know the truth? All you say is that you read some of the files called war documents after the trials were over.

Today you are satisfied that the official account is basically true. You believe unverified stories. I think it is because you have zero sympathy for Germans. You’re happy that you escaped from that unfortunate country and can totally identify with its destroyers – the English and Americans and Capitalism. Yet, you want to claim yourself as an expert on the German side too. You are “blogging” by putting up the official account of the Big Holocaust Lie and presenting yourself as trustworthy because you’re a native German and know the language and “was there.” But what you can tell us from your actual personal experience doesn’t back up any of it.

]]>
By: katana /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12435 Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:02:50 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12435 http://dachaukz.blogspot.jp/
FACTS AND FIGURES-AUSCHWITZ

INTRODUCTION AND PLAN

http://remember.org/camps/birkenau/bir-introduction.html

The concentration and death-camp complex at Auschwitz-Birkenau was the largest killing centre in the entire Nazi universe; the very heart of their system. Of the many sub-camps affiliated with Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was by far the largest. The main camp, Auschwitz I was on the outskirts of the Polish city Oswiecim. Birkenau was in a suburb named Zasole.

———————-

Herb, can you explain the existence of these various facilities in the Auschwitz camp that Carolyn discusses in her booklet ‘Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour’, namely:

* Brothel
* Library
* Art Museum
* Camp Orchestra
* Post Office
* Theatre
* Swimming Pool
* Hospital
* Workshops

Were these part of a devious, diabolical plan to ‘entertain’ the inmates to death?

Please cut to the chase and get to the point, in your reply.

Thanks.

]]>
By: Herbert Stolpmann /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12400 Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:02:04 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12400 Carolyn
Regarding Qasar
I did find his comments, and there might be some truth in it what he is stating although I am not certain of the background of the discussion.
[…]
The following will give you a better overall view of what we looked like going into battle against American Forces:http://hjandvolksturm.devhub.com/blog/473088-1-panzervernichtungsbrigade-hitlerjugend/ The present Pope, Herr Ratzinger was a member of one of these Units, but he absconded, pretending he was wounded with his arm in a sling and went apparently home, while others died for the Fatherland and the Final Victory! Another one I know of, was General Rommel’s son, but he surrendered to French troops.

]]>
By: Herbert Stolpmann /2013/02/16/an-investigation-into-a-holocaust-blogger/#comment-12365 Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:31:06 +0000 /?p=3396#comment-12365 Caroline
To your question:
What is the Germany you knew and loved, the ‘old’ Fatherland that no longer existed for you. And who or what do you think destroyed it?
The simple and short answer would be: Germany’s loss of the war and the subsequent carving up of the country that was prosperous to live in, for many who like us, due to hard work enjoyed a rather tranquil life on a country estate (which was not owed by us) in the far north east of Pomerania (Ost-Pommern) our land close to the border with Poland, from which my family were expelled ( I was not there at that time) after having our ancestrial roots traced back for over 700 years. Gerhard Stolpman was a Crusader Bishop and Teutonic Knight and a territorial Bishop from 1417-1427 at Pomersania , now called Kwidzyn about 75 km south of Danzig, and we believe he was married. The language spoken was High German, most peasant did speak Low German (Platt-Deutsch) which I can follow but not speak. The unbelievable tranquillity of life, admittedly with servants, I have never experienced again. You might claim we were privileged, that might be true to some extent, the happiness of my youth to be made welcome by other relations, not only by my Jewish Aunt was abruptly shattered with the disastrous treatment I and many others received during the unconditional surrender to the Allies. Our hopes were high that we would be treated according to the Geneva Convention, Eisenhower saw it differently. With my early release as a POW into a different kind of community that was allien from the northern population, in speech, Religion, and behaviour was a culture shock not only for me but for all those that came from the north, of Luthern/Evangelical upbringing. That was more or less the reason, why I did ask an American Lt. to take me back into the POW Camp. There were exception of course, but later on, in our civilian capacity working for the American Forces, when a Bavarian was employed, we as the so called Preußen (Prussians) made sure that he would not last longer than two weeks, and did I my part in it, when asked by my colleges.
To go back into a community that has not changed for the better would be anathema to me and I would never be able to fit in. I have lived happily in the country of my adoption for over 57 years and have no desire to ever return. As matter of interest, my wife is Bavarian, a Catholic, born in Munich, educated by Nuns, her Parents had a bakery in Dachau, which was used by KZ-Inmates during night shift to bake their bread and appears in picture as a child sitting on a Camp horse in one of my Blogs.
PS> Do you have the link to “Quasar” he seems to be Greek to me.
Herb

]]>