Comments on: Race and Blood – Part 2 /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/ Whites Talking to Whites About White Interests Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:47:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: Etienne /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-16176 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:48:08 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-16176 I wonder if you intend to discuss a book We Europeans (Penguin, 1935)by Julian Huxley and others with a chapter on Europe Overseas. This was intended to “debunk” a “vast pseudo-science of race biology”. Penguin published cheap paperbacks from the 1930s and thus became influential in forming popular opinion in Britain. For example, the Bishop of Durham comments on it in his introduction to The Yellow Spot (1936), a book about the Nazis and the Jews published by the Left Book Club in London (organised by…our friends and well wishers). This kind of literature marshalled the authority of “science” against Germany, when in fact the balance of argument is at least more ambiguous. This is perhaps more a question of popular history than the history of science you are taking on. Anyway, it’s interesting to hear someone talking about this whether or not you get around to the above.

]]>
By: Fred Wilson /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-16080 Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:53:37 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-16080 “However, when it comes to saving lives through bloodtransfusion and it is crucial to know the race of both the donor and the recipient, then this rule is allowed to be broken temporarily and unconspicuously, but only with the argument that it can save the lives of non-Whites, which betrays what “anti-racism” is really about :it is anti-Whitism.”

Funny thing, reality keeps poking its nose out. No matter how many kosher lies are stacked on top of it, reality just keeps reasserting itself. They can only ‘invert’ reality so much, then it capsizes .

Sad thing, in the period of reality inversion, millions of innocent souls are cruelly hurt.

]]>
By: Edward /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15897 Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:34:18 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15897 Blood and organ recipients should be like the old limewire p2p trading of songs, if you don’t agree to donate your organs upon death,and you need an organ, you don’t get one. Same thing with blood, if you haven’t donated any blood and you need blood well too bad, you should have donated.

I agree with the man in this audio, because of the racist anti-Whites that have invaded and taken over our land in America, Europe and Britian we are living in some kind of Twilight Zone episode where nothing makes any sense.

What is occuring though, is that White people are being oppressed and discriminated against and in fact are being call terrorist’s by Homeland Security and the LA Times, and it’s our own fault because we allow it. We are being set up to be murdered. TO ARMS!!! TO ARMS!!!

]]>
By: Franklin Ryckaert /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15700 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:06:38 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15700 The main rule of “anti-racism” is that race doesn’t exist and that that has been scientifically proven.(how strange that those same “anti-racists” never bother to prove that race doesn’t exist among animals and plants!) However, when it comes to saving lives through bloodtransfusion and it is crucial to know the race of both the donor and the recipient, then this rule is allowed to be broken temporarily and unconspicuously, but only with the argument that it can save the lives of non-Whites, which betrays what “anti-racism” is really about :it is anti-Whitism.

It is remarkable that when it comes to blood- or organ-donation, Whites are over-represented, while non-Whites (especially Blacks) are underrepresented. This too much of (transracial) altruism in Whites and too little in non-Whites is a major part of the race problem. Whites who are constantly being accused of “racism” have in reality too little of it than is necessary for racial survival. The problem is too little racial self-assertion of Whites and too much racial parasitism of non-Whites.

]]>
By: Fred Wilson /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15690 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:22:33 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15690 Tans said;
“The anti-racist dogma that race isn’t biological or isn’t significant is just plain wrong. And it creates a cognitive dissonance when it meats reality. That’s what you feel, this weird feeling when you see people saying things that contradict each other.”

You get that “weird feeling” because YOU ARE WHITE !

jws don’t have that problem. They can feel perfectly comfortable maintaining two or more mutually exclusive ideas at once. You will see this all the time while studying the works of jws.

One story for the customer , another story for the auditors , another story in court , another story for the investors etc.

Check out Barry Minkow and the ZZZZ Best story.
A real case study in the jwish mind and the ability to endlessly dissemble .

]]>
By: Fred Wilson /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15687 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:56:28 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15687 A good metaphor for antigens is a guarded gateway into the cell.
A cell , like a fortress , is mostly impregnable . And like a fortress , it can not be completely sealed, it needs controlled access to the world outside its walls.

The antigen acts like guarded gateway. Only allowing molecules of certain type, size, shape and charge to enter or leave the cell . This allows the cell to communicate with other cells and to ‘sense’ the environment around it.

This is why the transfusion of White Blood into a black starts a lethal reaction. The White Blood can ‘sense'( by the presence of strange molecules ) that it is not in its proper environment and starts fighting (via anti-bodies) with its new alien environment.

Notice how the science community uses nearly opaque terms to describe these things, keeping it from the general population. So much like medieval times when Latin was used to keep law and religion beyond the reach of the common peasant .

]]>
By: Fred Wilson /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15681 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:24:19 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15681 The level of black participation in organ donation is virtually 0%. It is so scandalous that the figures are very rarely publishing. If they are, it’s in the back of some arcane academic journal.

]]>
By: Fred Wilson /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15678 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:12:50 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15678 “In the UK you can see disparate participation in organ donation. ”

That is also very true in the USA, the proportions are worse than 20 to 1. ( 20 whites donate for every 1 black . That’s adjusted for population proportions , too !)

Again, socially irresponsible. It shows up , time and time again. It is genetically determined behavior.

]]>
By: Fred Wilson /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15677 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:06:32 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15677 Blacks don’t donate blood in proportion to their population? Can you say “socially irresponsible” ? I deeply suspect that blacks donating blood are mostly ‘paid’ donors .

Don’t dismiss ‘allergic reaction’, allergic reactions can be fatal.

(Another interesting factor on socially irresponsible behavior. Blacks are 11% of the American Population, yet they farm less than 0.1% of the farmland . Such a small amount of farming that it doesn’t even register on the FDA listings. THEY DON’T FEED US OR THEMSELVES !)

]]>
By: Lurker /2013/03/12/race-and-blood-part-2/#comment-15659 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 03:12:02 +0000 /?p=3639#comment-15659 In the UK you can see disparate participation in organ donation. Almost needless to say more whites per capita participate than non-whites. Where there is a tissue match across racial lines its more likely to be a non-white benefiting from white organs rather than vice versa. Thus whites die to keep non-whites alive.

]]>