Comments on: On Hitler’s birthday: He proves to be the world’s most famous man

By: Netzband

Netzband — Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:16:44 +0000

Yes not so much intellectual theory it was, but a revitalisation of the people, the Volk, as all witnesses tell, that one was there for the others, with idealism, what goes under the term od N-socialism. Anyone can read Hitlers speeches to Winterhilfswerk, and the real descriptions of the contemorary witnesses are what counts. It didn’t revolve around the relation to Jews or to the other peoples of Europe mainly. One can watch that all at the times of the Olympics in 36. Or even how Lloyd George described it and so many visitors from abroad.
That war then begun in 39 was, what all, who had experienced WW-1, did definitly not wish, and A, Hitler was only known as Chancellor for peace. His diplomacy was modest and started with proposals for disarmament (in Geneva? in 33- as demanded by the treaty of Versailles). He made treaties with Poland, Britain and so on.

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:11:07 +0000

One only need to understand the deeper meaning of its contents, so I leave it up to the above-mentioned nationals defending their intellect if anyone reads this.

It was never about “intellect” in the first place. It is about who did what and who made the greatest sacrifices. You do not want to get into that, do you?

But I respect every White European nation equally.

That is like saying, “I respect every White European person equally.” What does that say about you? That you’re not even thinking.

You are coming from a very different place with your “Hitler was a Zionist agent who purposely left Europe in ruins” nonsense. So it’s a good thing that you will have no further comments.

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:56:22 +0000

It’s just great that this book is available on the Internet. It is one of my favorites and everyone should read it. Thanks for giving the link.

The review of the book was written by Ted O’Keefe a long time ago, when there were still talented revisionists employed at the IHR. Before Mark Weber destroyed it.

By: HalKW

HalKW — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:39:41 +0000

Thank you Carolyn for the clarification.

As it wasn’t James himself commenting on this forum, I couldn’t address him.
One only need to understand the deeper meaning of its contents, so I leave it up to the above-mentioned nationals defending their intellect if anyone reads this.

There are good and bad, wise and stupid people in every nation.
But I respect every White European nation equally.

To avoid future conflicts between Whites, it would be wise ( in my opinion) to apply smart diplomatic solutions where mutual respect is present.

Therefore I have no further comments 😉

By: Netzband

Netzband — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:17:39 +0000

HalKW, The expression, you used “appalling” is for me negative, and as far as I understand those times, “arrogance” cannot describe the NS ideology. It was much centered on the own people, as James wrote. If you hint at comparing it to the Jews with their idea of beeing the “chosen people”, they, dominating the media and propaganda, typically blame their own (of the Pharisees) aims on other people, e.g.: wanting to rule the world, regarding others as animals, using the big lie.. and so on. About that “chosen” already Martin Luther wrote 500 years ago.
It is worth the efford to read about, what the real ideology of the NS was. Once it was recomended to me to read Lothrop Stoddard’s account, it is objective though a little bit painted dark, but then the war had begun – he had very rare interviews at that time:

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2p69_Stoddard.html
and the whole book can also be found in the internet
http://www.colchestercollection.com/authors/S/lothrop-stoddard.html
“Into the Darkness
An Uncensored Report from Inside the Third Reich at War
by Lothrop Stoddard
Journalist Lothrop Stoddard’s even-handed account of his travels through war-time Germany (and surrounding countries) from 1939-1940. His is a truthful report of the Third Reich, its leaders, political positions, and culture.

Stoddard was a renowned and well-respected journalist when he made this trip and subsequent report, because it recounts accurately (and not politically correctly), the events of the time, his name – not to mention his report – has all but disappeared from today’s “official” history concerning that period.”

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:54:29 +0000

Carolyn’s comment? It was James’ comment, sent through my website contact form, that I posted here. The lack of accuracy is one of the biggest problems we have in communicating. So what is the point you are trying to make, HalKW? Will you please describe the accomplishments of the Danes, Swiss, Finns, Swedes, French as compared to the Germans. Don’t go too far back in history to hunt for them. 🙂

I’m not speaking specifically about military achievements but, except for the Finns, they all remained neutral against the communists during the war. If you’re referring to the Waffen SS, please give accurate numbers of those who actually fought.

Submitted on 2013/04/22 at 8:46 pm by HalKW

Carolyn
April 21, 2013 at 9:03 pm

“From a listener at my website who wrote to me via the contact form. Since I have never enabled comments on the posts there, I’m copying his message here:

One of your best shows. i agree especially when you say that Hitler cared the most for his own German people. I think the reason that he used the socio-Darwinistic viewpoint so much is because he knew that the white-Germanic people were superior to everyone else and he wanted to restore pride back to his country. So many historians have vilified him for this but to me he used it to give his people more pride and confidence. I’m not saying he was wrong in his viewpoint, but he was so right in telling his people that they were the cream of the crop of human kind. Great show Carolyn, keep it up! -James”
—————————–

“….the cream of the crop of human kind”

as

the God’s chosen people…

So, who is better? LOL

Geez! No wonder some nations resent you for your ARROGANCE!

What about the Danes, Swiss, Fins, Swedish, French….?

Well, just have another good look at Hitler.

APPALLING!

By: HalKW

HalKW — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 05:13:24 +0000

@ Netzband

Please read Carolyn’s comment 9:03 pm 🙂

By: Netzband

Netzband — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:53:41 +0000

P.S. if A.Hitler said or wrote, as quoted by HalKW – copying an e-mail: “but he was so right in telling his people that they were the cream of the crop of human kind…” — then this can be understood that every people can say something like that, assuming they have the good will to contribute to the technical, spiritual culture of humanity. It is like saying that we are daughters and sons of God and isn’t it so, that we strive for the higher. This is something other than race-mixing and equalization to a communist level of the lowest common denominator (the mass-media).
It is good that humans and cultures are different as in nature all the diversity is astounding and mysterious.

By: Netzband

Netzband — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:29:58 +0000

what – HalKW April 22, 2013 at 8:46 pm –
wrote there is not true.
After enough time to learn the attitude, the way the “old” Germans thought and felt towards the other european peoples, and other races, they were modest, even humble through thousand years of Christian history of Europe.. and there is not much, even almost nothing to support the propaganda that in the NS-time it had been much different. The direction in that time had been to restore self-confidence, to trust the creativity of our people again after the defeat in WW-1, Wilsons betrayal with his 14-points, the British starvation going on until the dictate of Versailles was signed. – with the unjust accusation of the war- guilt, having started the war, to dominate Europe and the world, and now having to pay for that.
Doesn’t that remind someone of the propaganda during and after the second worldwar??
If the Bolshevics have been called “Untermenschen” it was for their behavior in the slaughterhouse of the Soviets, in the starvation of the Ukraine e.g., the Gulags, and not against the Russians as a people, who were often relatives of germanic peoples.
Germany’s culture has given to the world valuable contributions and that one can be proud of. One will hardly find much arrogance in all of that, and not in the thinking of the time 33-45.

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:44:12 +0000

Look it up - http://www.forvo.com/word/weltanschauung (click on the little blue arrow to hear it)