Because that is what they ARE.

http://unamusementpark.com/2011/04/hatred-iii-the-hispanic-panic/
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/05/05/0914618107

“Hispanic/Latino populations possess a complex genetic structure that reflects recent admixture among and potentially ancient substructure within Native American, European, and West African source populations. …

Comparing autosomal, X and Y chromosome, and mtDNA variation, we find evidence of a significant sex bias in admixture proportions consistent with disproportionate contribution of European male and Native American female ancestry to present-day populations. …”

Male Spaniard conquistadors took native women as wives, systematically, over a continent and a half. The result is the Hispanic race. Hispanics are not Spaniards and they are not Aryan. If you try to insist that they are, you are just playing Humpty Dumpty games and will confuse everyone. People know what Hispanic means: it means those brown-skinned people who speak Spanish.

I will always be on your side …

Thanks for that, Dana. You have always behaved in that manner toward me.

I’ll admit I am more of a right-brained thinker, and like to stream different topics together into a whole, rather than having a rigorous, reductionist approach. Its just my style I guess.

You call it right-brained, but I just call it sloppy and unfocused. Your distaste for the ‘rigorous, reductionist approach’ is very un-Germanic and is why I experience you as ‘all over the place.’ You say, “It’s just my style.” I say, It’s just your nature. Another factor that is probably present is that you are avoiding truths that don’t benefit you personally, or which might make you feel excluded. Although you shouldn’t feel that way as long as you are honest about who you are.

We can recognize that we have similar larger, long-term goals for White people, but we can’t really communicate satisfactorily with each other.

Further, in my study of breeding I have found that cross-breeding in a willy-nilly way is a game of chance – sometimes it works out, more of the time it doesn’t. But the greatest drawback is that there is no consistency of type; a lot of oddballs are created that are not one thing or another. It makes it more difficult to unite these people into a single mindset and this might account for the popularity of Individualism in the modern world, and especially in the USA. That, to me, is more the source of divisiveness (and weakness/disunity) than is nationalism that you try to make it out to be.

P.S.

The biggest and most obvious is the anti-German attitudes of the British.

The vast majority of British were not anti-German. London and the Jewish and ‘judaized-money Brits’ were anti-German nationalism or anti-German power/competitiveness. This is an example of why what you say is meaningless.

**I’m for all European nations withdrawing from this entity (the EU) (fifth paragraph)

***I already hear cries of racial mischling (seventh paragraph)

****nine out of ten white people i meet (last paragraph)

Now, I blame the Jewish influence as a major cause of the war, but if you think its the only cause, I have to differ with you. If there weren’t inter-ethnic rivalries and disputes that existed prior to the conflict in which the Jews were able to manipulate to their advantage, its possible that the catastrophic even could’ve been avoided.

There are more examples other than the ones I mentioned, but what is important here is a mindset – one of ultra-nationalism, or what is commonly called “petty.” The biggest and most obvious is the anti-German attitudes of the British. Do we really want Greeks fighting Macedonians, or Hungarians arguing with Romanians? I understand that some nations have honest grievances, and that Germany was in the right when they had issue with Poland prior to the war; I would just like to see the principle of racial unity triumph over ethnic division, and this of course doesn’t mean we have to abandon true, positive nationalism.

When you say marrying outside of the race “is just a further step” after marrying outside your particular group – of course, but I see nothing wrong or inherently “bad” about mixes occuring within the race. If all separate groups were to be lost this would be tragic, but I don’t see that as a threat at this point, especially when the entire race is threatened as a whole. Plus, in the distant past, our race was one and came from the same source/wellspring if you go far back enough…though I could be wrong. In addition to this, I don’t believe National Socialists held a view against inter-european marriages. If a Dane married a Spaniard, or an Irishman an Italian, etc., I don’t think they really planned on enforcing such restrictions, not that it would’ve been encouraged. I’ve seen so many beautiful mixes of different European groups, and I personally look at blood as a tribal thing, like celtic, greco-roman, germanic, slavic, etc., rather than nations which have boundaries that have changed over the centuries so often.

The EU is a zionist run organization that is completely at odds with “the new europe” or new order under National Socialism. I don’t know why you would even think I endorse that. I’m for ALL European nations should withdraw from this entity and get back their sovereignty, and then maybe in the future when we have broken the back of our oppressors we can begin to establish bonds of race.

I would never tell the Europeans what to do, I’m merely looking at the total situation and differentiating between the U.S. and Europe. And to recap, my general thesis which you seemed to jump on was a mere observation that in the U.S. we have a blended white race with too little ethno-racial consciousness (bad), although we can see ourselves as one race (good), and in Europe we have nationalists that have strong ethno-cultural identities and ties to their homeland (good), but sometimes it gets to be too tribal at can come at the expense of european racial unity.

I have never deceived anybody of my racial heritage and I am as follows: 62.5% Italian (with both northern, more Germanic-laced and Central); 12.5% Greek, and 1/4 Assyrian-Iranian. My father is 100% Italian, with blonde hair and blue eyes, and my mother is half italian-greek, or what i like to call ‘greco-roman,’ and half Assyrian with roots in Iran. Now, I already here calls of mischling coming from the crowd, but I would just like to say that my mother looks like a typical white mediterranean woman, and Assyrians basically look like a cross between a Greek and Persian (who were Aryans in ancient times). Culturally, Assyrians, Greeks and Armenians are very close peoples, same food, religion (eastern orthodox/catholic christian), same enemies (turks), same music, etc. They are ancient people ethnically distinct from Arabs and actually survived by being a Christian minority in the Middle East, and the first people to invade Israel during biblical times, which I’m very proud of. Sorry for the long rant here.

I realize in this country there are pockets of communities that are still ethnically pure, but I have to be honest, nine out of ten white people I might, regardless of where in the country, are mixed white ethnicities (and you can define white however you wish). I agree with you that Jews have been fundamental in destroying white ethnic and racial consciousness, as a result of the war, and through the various cultural marxist movements, through media/hollywood, education, etc. Indeed, it has been asserted that when white nationalism elevates race too much to the point that all whites are equal regardless of quality by virtue of skin tone, that is a racial marxism in itself – and i am against that. I think we should all be elitists and put quality over quantity. As far as doing the work of the Jews, come on Carolyn, if you don’t know me by now and can’t see that I’m on your side, what more can I say.

You can attack Sunic all you want – but I see the horrible results of inter-european ethnic rivalry and hatred, and this largely contributed to two world wars.

Wow. Are you really saying that? I thought it was the jews who set up the two world wars by interjecting jewish bolsheviks into ethnic disputes. Sunic is saying what he does because he wants to be seen as a European, not a Croatian. He takes no pride in Croatia. Plus I don’t “attack” Sunic; I only observe what I see and filter it through my own understanding.

Whether its English-Irish; Croat-Bosnia-Serb, Poland-German; etc.

These are the groupings Sunic always uses. And the only ones he uses. Is he the model for your thinking?

I have honestly heard some chauvinistic whites of certain ethnic groups say things like “if my daughter doesn’t marry one of us she might as well go with a black,” instead of her going another european. thats what i’m talking about.

This is irrelevant hearsay and not representative. But as a matter of fact, it IS better for people to marry within their own ethnic group; there would be more children and less divorce. The increasing acceptance of “marrying out” has led to marrying further and further “out.” Marrying outside of your race is just a further step beyond marrying outside your ethnic group.

The best solution I can come up with is Europeans need to maintain and preserve each nation/ethnic identity, but they should all put the race over the tribe.

Who are you to tell Europeans what to do? There are instances, or will be, when they put their nation’s interest over Europeanism if the “European consensus” or majority is ganging up for reasons of their national interest, which does happen. You’re saying the same thing as the EU, which proceeds to destroy all national sovereignty. We don’t live in the perfect world that you theorize in. I think there needs to be more clarity when we say we’re nationalists–what does that mean? Is it just a pose?

Would you mind telling your mixed ethnicity/national roots? I’m under the impression you are only part Italian. Please set me straight.

The U.S. is obviously different because we don’t really have separate white groups, aside from some communities in the cities.

Are you sure about that? I grew up within a community of German-Americans who had all emigrated from the same location, to a small-to-medium sized town. They already knew each other when they got here. They formed a Family Society club, built a clubhouse, and maintained the rule that only offspring of the original founders could ever be members. They worked it out that “outsider” spouses could be members as long as they were married to that partner, but only the children who could trace their bloodline to an original founding member could become members. This club is still going, fourth and even fifth generation! It’s nothing like Amish (separating themselves from the rest of society) and never was. They just took advantage of American freedom to try to keep their heritage and togetherness going.

The loss of ethnic consciousness in the U.S. is in largest part the result of the two jew-inspired-and-jew-driven world wars. The jew-media plays a big role. So, in a way, you sound like you’re asserting the jew-doctrine of “we’re all the same.” Be careful, lest you be doing the work of the jews.

The two links provide pictures, articles and other stuff. The second link is in English so check it out guys.

http://rechtsactueel.com/2013/06/12/europa-tegen-wall-street/

http://www.eurorus.org/index.php

People are trying to form an alliance of different White countries. The last thing we need is White people versus White people. What we need is unity. This does not mean that we “must” have one big organisation and forget our own local groups. We can simply do both.