Y’all’s exposure of “money changer” and political hack Bobby Jindal and his deracinated Republican supporters as subversive hypocrites hit the mark. Informative. Refreshing.

Tan, as one who has been described negatively as a “purist,” I appreciate your definition of purity as being a positive descriptor for White loyalists, in the context of our striving to be free from anything that debases, contaminates or pollutes our gene pool. WN orthodoxy being Nature-ordered does not reject purity as an ideal, but as necessary to upward striving.

Every pro-White activist should have the books you recommend — Simpson’s WWWM? Dr. Pierce’s WWA and Grant’s POTGR — in his personal library

Tom Sunic’s promotion of paganism as a the world view that will somehow defeat the treacherous Jew makes about as much sense as his promotion of Harold Covington as a legitimate spokesman for WN.

The White preservationist cause is pan-Aryan with the tall, long-headed, fair-haired, fair-skinned, fair-eyed, recessive-gened Nordic type being the ideal most in need of preserving and expanding. Alpines (like Mr. Hitler) and Mediterranean-type Europeans are no less valued. We know who are White and who are not.

Interesting anti-White article from the Jewish Daily Forward about the 100th anniversary of Leo Frank lynching, found here: http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=87&p=164#p164

Whites have a “deep psychological aversion” to anything having to do with Whiteness and regard race science as “fringe” due to jewish propaganda. It is not natural. Prior to the current jewish hegemony over media and academy the views of Gobineau and Grant were well-known and respected by Whites.

You seem to have a problem with the truth and wish instead to argue about what to sell in its place. I don’t.

You would literally be turning brother against brother considering the descendants of most mainland Europeans have variable admixtures. It’s only natural that they would have a deep psychological aversion to a ‘fringe’ Scientific theory.

If you can’t see the major problems in trying to ‘sell’ this to the broader White/European community, I don’t know what else to say.

Now it’s only a theory but I suspect there is a large sub-conscious aversion to ‘Classification by Purity’ among most White people

Decades of jew propaganda has loaded the word purity with negative associations in a White racial context. In other contexts the meaning of the word remains extremely positive.

which is why these movements are still-born. Now are you telling me it’s only Jew Propaganda that causes many Whites to be repulsed by Pro-White movements? – because something isn’t adding up.

Mostly. For example, consider the word purity.

Madison Grant laid out his Nordicist views in The Passing of the Great Race, another book I recommend to those interested in the racial history of Europeans. This book was very popular when it was first published in 1917. Wermod and Wermod’s synopsis:

The Passing of the Great Race is one of the most prominent racially oriented books of all times, written by the most influencial American conservationist that ever lived. Historically, topically, and geographically, Grant’s magnum opus covers a vast amount of ground, broadly tracing the racial history of Europeans from prehistoric times to the present, with an emphasis on the need to preserve the northern European type and generally improve the race—for Grant was, logically, a proponent of eugenics. Generally well received at the time in both the popular and scholarly press and going through four editions and multiple reprints, Theodore Roosevelt described The Passing of the Great Race as ‘a capital work’.

Jews don’t use the word “racist”, they use “anti-semite.” It is Blacks who use the claim Racism and in this sense you are correct.

Obviously I’m over-sensationalizing this issue to make a point I think is still important. Carolyn is considered “Tainted” according to extreme Nordicist views which may be partly what leads her to preferring Regional Nationalism (Bavarian) over Pan-Whitism.

Now it’s only a theory but I suspect there is a large sub-conscious aversion to ‘Classification by Purity’ among most White people which is why these movements are still-born. Now are you telling me it’s only Jew Propaganda that causes many Whites to be repulsed by Pro-White movements? – because something isn’t adding up.

Any White person who doesn’t have Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes is going to (at some point) wonder why they should help people, who will cast them as 2nd Class Citizens the moment they gain power.

You’re inverting it and blaming them for it, but it’s you here making your hostility and resentment toward people with blonde hair and blue eyes plain.

can’t for the life of me understand why a Nordicist is any less my enemy than a Jew. At least a jew is relatively open about their views.

And again.

You use “Nordicist” in the same way jews use “racist”. It means someone you don’t like. Their sin, in your mind, is valuing something you don’t.