Himmler in April 1945 — give me a break! Exactly when in April? We know what Himmler was trying to do in April’45 – grasping at straws! And, just to play along a little with Henry, Himmler was not representing the German govt. at the time (still under Hitler) but had become a rogue element, on his own.

You are no longer welcome to post comments to my programs, Henry. So long.

Markus asked originally: “Was there any official communication between the German government and the Jewish World Congress or any other club?”

Henry answers: “there was considerable contact and agreement between the Germans and the various agencies of the WJC.” Not the German government, mind you, but “the Germans.” By which he means Wisleceny, a minor official.

Nowhere, Henry, do you cite any correspondence from the German government. All you’ve got are WJC jews talking to each other.

Marcus, you shouldn’t let Carolyn to do this to you. She is the Queen of bias.

As for her ”Jewish version of events” – The Jews haven’t given a version of these events. I’ve merely repeated what they discussed in secret among themselves. Which is something quite different to what she suggests.

The approach to the WJC from the Gestapo is discussed in internal correspondence between Goldmann and Wise and was never released nor meant to be.

I found it about 6yrs ago. It’s inside a 100+ page document that contains, among other things, discussions and instructions on feeding false information to the press. For example: in September 1939, the WJC claimed that when the Germans went into Poland they murdered Jews in their thousands using methods which included the drowning of hundreds in the river Bug. Claiming Jews who tried to get out of the river were ”beheaded” on the banks!

Wise instructed this BS to be fed to the world’s media but ordered that the source of the story (the WJC) must not be disclosed.

What is missing from this document is the final report from the Jewish agents then assisting the Nazis (more corporation) with the deportations from Germany/Austria. They were given the task of sending back the report on this issue. It’s not in that document file but may be elsewhere in the archive.

So enough with this crap that I’m peddling the ‘Jewish versions’ of events.

As for Wisliceny? The reason the man found himself in the cells at Nuremberg was precisely because of his close work with the WJC.

He and his mother were in hiding. His mother contacted the WJC to come and rescue him as per the agreement he thought he had with them. She sent the WJC details of the address where they could be found. The WJC then arranged with the Wislicenys a time that they would call; but instead of keeping their part of the bargain, the Jews passed this information to the Americans at Nuremberg. The Americans then went along in place of the WJC and this is how he was captured.

Again, I have the documents which contain these details and they also list the names of the WJC and OSS officers involved.

Btw: I didn’t say Wisliceny wasn’t tortured and I did describe the evidence from his statement as being a ‘claim’ – this much is true – but don’t pretend that he and the rest of Eichmann’s group hadn’t worked closely with the World Jewish Congress when in fact they had.

You write of Nahum Goldman speaking to the Allies, then of an “approach” to the WJC by the Gestapo about helping Jews leave Germany (according to Goldman), but no records from the Gestapo, only what Goldman reported. “They are missing,” you say. You rely totally on Jewish versions of events.

Testimony gained from Wisleceny in the prison at Nuremburg is hardly “official” and it’s also false. So I don’t know what Markus is thanking you for.