Comments on: How and why the United States ‘turned’ Poland’s foreign policy in 1939

By: Dutch

Dutch — Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:37:03 +0000

Sorry for the messy link in my previous post, Please delete the link. Here a more civilized one:

By: Dutch

Dutch — Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:35:12 +0000

Carolyn, I found this myself:

google “Poland and the Coming of the Second World War: The Diplomatic Papers of A.J. Drexel Biddle” [pdf] or click

https://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDAQFjAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fkb.osu.edu%2Fdspace%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F1811%2F6333%2FPOLAND_AND_THE_COMING_OF_THE_SECOND_WORLD_WAR_txt.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1&ei=goSOUpSNF7H40gWt54EY&usg=AFQjCNFQkw0D_1Fa8g4NxZ-1CsWpIqrhJQ&sig2=xRqoaYsuHM09ZJoSTpnd2Q&bvm=bv.56988011,d.d2k

To my disappointment there are indeed ‘Memorandum A/B/C’ included, from page 270 onwards, but not the most interesting Memorandum D. Maybe left out on purpose? There is however a reference to a ‘Third Europe’, but that is described as the Polish wish to be part of a a group of neutral nations between Baltic and Black Sea, not a Polish wish for hegemony between Baltics and Black Sea.

Always listen to your show, keep up the good work!
Your work, like this particular show, will find it’s way in my not so pc WW1/WW2 blog. 😉
I have a feeling we are going to win.

kind regards from Holland

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:42:13 +0000

weichseler – Interesting. I’ll try to look into that when I get the chance.

I can’t answer Dutch’s request either. Anyone?

By: weichseler

weichseler — Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:13:33 +0000

Another great question regarding the Polish-German conflict of 1939 is: where exactly was Karol Jozef Wojtyla (later Pope John Paul) in August & September of 1939, and what exactly was he doing? I’ve read that he was in a Polish Army regiment, (a picture of him, armed and in uniform exists) in the “corridor”, near Bromberg, of all places. He supposedly hid out in Catholic churchs during the war, and later entered the priesthood. What exacty what was he hiding from, and furthermore, what did he know, or, ahem, do, during the frightful anti-German pogroms and massacres in that region? Inquiring minds would sure as hell like to know.

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:47:15 +0000

Good points, Markus. I don’t disagree with you. I’m being careful not to step on too many toes. The Russian Czar’s government was administered by Germans who were brought in to do that job. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was also administered by its German population. But it’s just too bad that today’s “Germany” is working in collaboration with the European Union and the United States … while Russia is able to look like the “better White nation.” Britain is sold out too. This is the problem we have in celebrating the Germanic race in present time.

As Piotr Z. said, with an appreciative chuckle: “Angela Merkel is pursuing the same European policy as did Hitler – a united Europe. But he tried to do it with tanks; she is using banks.” Not that I even agree with the analogy; it’s really just a cheap joke. One can’t compare Merkel with Hitler, but he did.

By: Markus

Markus — Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:12:06 +0000

The argument is full in the open I think. I didn’t invent these terms like Slav/slave, rob/robot/orphan.

Are we Whites all equal? What White ethnicity is known as the poets and thinkers, the inventors and order loving, structure giving employment creators? All of them?

Voice of Albion mentioned that most technological inventions in modern times come from Germany, Britain and the US. Anglos and Saxons mainly. German ethnicity.

Why is Russia not doing better? They possess half of Europe and half of Asia and are less productive than whatever is left of Germany.

Do you think Russia would be in that condition if it was run by Germans?

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:50:14 +0000

You would probably get an argument on this from Slavic people. You are kind of playing word games that are not so clear-cut.

By: Markus

Markus — Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:33:06 +0000

One more thing.

Untermensch vs Übermensch
Subhuman/Underman vs Abovehuman/Overman.

Übermensch is philosphical, Nietzsche. Anything below the Übermensch is subordinated, unter.

Does that mean Hitler killed millions of Poles as they want us to believe or that they can’t stand the fact that Germans are intellectually superior? (By and large).

By: Markus

Markus — Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:02:00 +0000

If you translate German Slave or Sklave (Slav and slave) into Russian, both are rab, the same.

By: Dutch

Dutch — Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:13:14 +0000

Can somebody please give links to the memorandums A, B, C and most important D, as well as the American Embassy report dated 17 November 1937?

Thanks in advance.