Thanks endzog,
You are right on. I intend to first go after those who are giving Mark Weber airtime and treating him as both an “expert” and a fighter for the White race. A panel show would be another first step. I think we should first try to get everyone on board against Mark Weber; that would be a really big step. It seems to me it should not be difficult because once our people know the facts, how can they still think well of him?? He will be pressured to say or do something.

I have too much going on right now, and I suppose I need to clearly separate the Mark Weber and John Friend issues, too.

It is really not easy to get Juergen Graf to take the time to do things like you suggest. Life is not simple for him. And I am also busy with the Jan. 27 event. It’s a big investment for me; people don’t exactly line up to help, but it’s hard to figure out HOW people can help too. It can’t be a hodge-podge of multiple ideas, etc. But a radio show with several people on it to talk about Mark Weber can be arranged right now.

I appreciate your interest, Rusty. I will be on this topic Monday night, Dec. 9. And I will be trying to stay on it for the near future.

Thanks again.

I would love to debate him on any one (or all four) of those fraudulently alleged “holocausts” and why he lacks the courage to take a “position” on these so-called “specific events.”

Yes, so would I. Maybe you and I can get together and debate him in absentia. He would be welcome to join if he wished and I would remain only providing the platform. But since he will never do that, we’d be justified in doing it without him.

A Target of Bigotry

Predictably, we have come under fire from hostile sectarian groups that regard the IHR as harmful to their interests. Zionist groups such as the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Anti-Defamation League routinely smear the IHR, attacking us as a “hate group” or dismissing us as a “Holocaust denial” organization.

In fact, the IHR steadfastly opposes bigotry of all kinds. We are proud of the support we have earned from people of the most diverse political views, and racial, ethnic and religious backgrounds.

The IHR does not “deny” the Holocaust. Indeed, the IHR as such has no “position” on any specific event or chapter of history, except to promote greater awareness and understanding, and to encourage more objective investigation.

Yes, in 2004, it was “sinking.” However, it has now sunk to the bottom.

Here are article titles that I found on the IHR website today (12-3-13):

Eating Nuts May Prolong Life, New Study Shows (BBC News)

US Cities That Foreign Governments Warn Their Citizens About (The Washington Post)

Modern Life ‘Turning People Off Sex’ (BBC News)

Today’s Kids Less Fit Than Their Parents Were, New Study Finds (The Associated Press)

Pope Francis Calls Unfettered Capitalism ‘A New Tyranny’ (Reuters)

The Untold Story of Military Sexual Assault (The New York Times)

We need an “Institute for Historical Review” to see this cut and paste crap that we get from yahoo?

Mark Weber is a worse than worthless parasite and should not be supported in any way, shape or form.

Mark Weber is a spineless fraud – utterly lacking in courage, integrity and character. Look at this statement from the IHR’s website:

“The IHR does not “deny” the Holocaust. Indeed, the IHR as such has no “position” on any specific event or chapter of history, except to promote greater awareness and understanding, and to encourage more objective investigation.”

http://www.ihr.org/main/about.shtml

So what Weber is saying is – he does not “deny” the fraudulently alleged Belzec holocaust; he does not “deny” the fraudulently alleged Chelmno holocaust; he does not “deny” the fraudulently alleged Sobibor holocaust; and he does not “deny” the fraudulently alleged Treblinka holocaust.

I would love to debate him on any one (or all four) of those fraudulently alleged “holocausts” and why he lacks the courage to take a “position” on these so-called “specific events.”

Keep up the good fight Carolyn.