I have mixed feelings about Weber as I enjoyed the shows he did on the VOR. I get the impression that Rodney Martin is trying to breath some life into the IHR by encouraging Weber to actually do something.

Mixed feelings is not good. 🙂 I enjoyed some of them too, but that is not reason enough for him to keep the IHR hijacked. Weber is not going to do anything that takes any energy; Weber has always loved chatting on the phone for hours more than anything else. You should listen to the people who really know, or compare what Weber does with what real working revisionists do. Weber can still make podcasts when he’s not IHR Director, and he can write and do many other things. What he can’t do then is have the contributions to the IHR for his own personal use.

They put on some events recently.

Did they? A few people showed up? I didn’t hear about them.

More disturbing is Rodney teaming up with Pastor Eli James after Bill Finck outed him a few months ago.

I agree with you there, Nemeth! Bill’s case that Eli is jewish was airtight to me, but as I heard it, Rodney couldn’t get either Bill (no way, jose) or Brian as a host, so he settled for Eli. That’s not a justified reason.

Dana interviews Mark Weber and near the end of the interview, a caller asks him if there were any gas chambers and he says there were a few in Poland. Then the caller says that the Germans were the “good guys” and would NEVER throw people in gas chambers. Weber gets all shook up and doesn’t know how to respond.

I listened. Weber: Over 2 million jews were killed, but under 6 million. What can one make of that?! And he again attributes it to David Irving. DI is not a holocaust revisionist. Mark Weber is or used to be, but he has to follow Irving. Make sense? And Dana is jumping in to protect Mark, saying he agrees with Mark that numbers are not important, not important at all. What goes on at that network?

Otherwise, something I left out on the program, which I intended to say, is that John Friend right after the “debate’ grabbed the moral high ground for himself, and that’s where he is attempting to sit — on that throne. It was a defensive move and very Judaic. You don’t have to be physically Jewish to be Judaized.

I trust your instinct on things, indeed I would possibly go so far as to say if there is one truthful, incorruptible person out there we can trust one hundred percent and rely on to do what’s right, that person is you.

There are lots (well, quite a few) of seemingly great people fighting our cause, but very few we would trust with our lives. I am 99% confident in the motives of some, less with others who still do, on the face of it, a good job, but it takes a little extra indefinable something to engender 100% of my trust. You come as close, indeed closer, than anyone else in ‘the movement’ that I don’t and can’t personally know.

So your take on all these people is of real value and interest.

In a reply above, you mentioned not liking Wayne from Canada. Please elaborate on this. I’ve found his website to be an excellent resource and have no reason at all to question his motives, unless you can provide some, which actually, I really hope that on reflection, you cannot, as it would be a big let down. I hope you are just being harsh and over critical, but if there are other, serious issues, please let us know what they are.

It was shameful what you said, Miss Yeager, and is doing nothing but further dividing this already fractured “movement”, and that benefits no one but the cabal, whether you realize it or not.

I have my problems with what John Friend genuinely believes, as does Dr. Fetzer, but I would never be insulting and say things like you did in this program, and all that I can say is shame on you.

Lindsey