There was no choice about Operation Barbarossa, because the Red Army was poised to attack. http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2010/11/hitlers-policy-toward-ussr-justified.html

As for the story (cited by VKC) of the Lebanese Ahmed Al-Akhdary who had lived in Germany three years and claimed fifty years later in 1989 that he had joined the NSDAP, that story makes no sense on its face. If all the evidence for the story is that he said so, the simple explanation is that it is not true.

Something new is in the air. Where people once identified themselves as German, Italian, Greek, and so on, albeit White, the spreading of consciousness to belonging to a distinct and singular race broadens the playing field greatly. One individual or one ethnic group is no longer an island. This, coupled with awareness of the weaknesses within the race — pathological altruism and gullibility, for instance, greatly enhances chances for winning a battle that Hitler lost perhaps due to some of these same weaknesses. At least, these two developments are what have inspired me, and I do not think I am alone in this assessment. Political consciousness of race matters on a global scale was something Hitler had in situ, embryonically.

Carolyn, I’ll hand you that this “internationalism” (for lack of a better term) was never the initial intent of the NS movement. But I never said that it was. None of my books assert this either.

I do not intend to encroach on the white movement in any way, as I have never been part of it nor am I interested in it. Having said that, I do have a serious question for you and others in this movement: What makes white nationalists (the white network, if you will) think that they can succeed where Hitler himself failed?

“By the way, regarding “Black Nazis”, “Nazi is not an accurate term in the first place, but I have yet to find a single NON-Aryan member of the NSDAP recorded any where.”

The “Black Nazis” title comes straight from this Ken magazine article (I possess an actual copy of this 1939 edition of Ken):
http://oldmagazinearticles.com/Nazi_efforts_to_rreclaim_imperial-German_African_colonies

As for Mr Martin’s other comment…

Ahmed Al-Akhdary (“Dory”), a Lebanese man who worked and lived in the Third Reich from 1936 to 1939, was interviewed by Moustafa Assad in 1989. Dory’s interview was published by historian Antonio J Munoz in his book “The East Came West”. Dory informed Assad that he was a member of the NSDAP. He was also recruited by the SS and Germany Army to do special missions.

See: http://www.amazon.com/The-East-Came-West-Volunteers/dp/1891227394

“The tactical expression of this theoretical difficulty revealed itself in a manner which demanded immediate resolve. While it was true that a “true” Nordic (Nordic genotype) could not be distinguished from a “pseudo” Nordic (Nordic only in physical type) it seemed reasonable (at least to Guenther) to presume that where one found a higher incidence of Nordic morphological traits one would find a higher incidence of Nordic psychic traits. Now as long as this remained vague and general not much objection could be raised against it. But again Guenther insisted on “there is but one equality of birth: that based on the equal purity clusion.” “From the racial standpoint,” he informed his readers, “there is but one equality of birth: that based on the equal ***PURITY of Nordic blood***. Racially the nobleman of mixed race is ***NOT*** of equal birth with a Nordic peasant girl.” (89) Thus those who display Nordic physical features must be considered “most worth-while” (90) while mixed types, no matter what their station or capacity, are correspondingly inferior.

Thus although we cannot definitively identify a “PURE” Nordic we can identify hybrids (people under 170cm. in height, whose cephalic index is over 76, whose nasal index is platyrrhine, whose facial index is under (90), whose hair is brunet or whose eyes are hazel or brown, who are not slender, nor have thin lips nor firm chin). These, Guenther tells us, we must painfully identify as bastards, (91) and as such second class citizens – inferior in worth to the (at least physically) ***”PURE”*** Nordic.” (emphasis added)

See: http://dienekes.110mb.com/texts/natsoc/

AnonymousDecember 6, 2013 at 4:40 PM

Why do you suppose Carolyn Yeager is so angry and nasty?

Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that she never married and never had any children?

Now, why is that? Could it possibly be due to her nasty disposition and utter rudeness? Or is she nasty and rude because she never married and never had any children? [I did marry, so this qualifies as a typical jew fantasy -cy)

Ok – here’s the real question: how many cats does she have? 20? 25?

LOL
Reply
Replies

AnonymousDecember 6, 2013 at 8:09 PM

She has repeatedly tried to hook up with white nationalist & revisionist men and failed. One in particular was Lon Kramer. [Lon Kramer! Years ago he got drunk and just about had a nervous breakdown when I told him I wasn’t going to meet up with him. It was Friedrich Paul Berg who wanted me to get to know his friend Lon so I emailed with him for awhile, and he also called me. Ask Fritz. -cy] She also emails people in the movement to get them to send her personal information about real and perceived enemies of white nationalism. [Name one example, you pos. -cy]

One revisionist I know personally described her as “a nutcase.” [haha, you don’t know a single real “revisionist]

She is a bigot. She proclaims the white motherhood deal while she herself can’t even get her hooks into one white man. I think she has a “thing” for Anglin though. She talks about him as though he’s the second coming. [Unworthy of comment]

So this is what John Friend allows to sit on his blog for 5 days! This tells you everything you need to know about this fake “I have never done anything against anybody” Christian. Like some others I could name, he lets others do the dirty work for him.

** Permanent statement from JF’s comment page: Thanks for reading! If you feel compelled to comment, please do. But please – no ad hominem attacks. If you have a criticism to lodge against myself or anyone else, please do so but there is no need for personal attacks. [Unless it’s against my detractors, LOL]

Tammy Bruce is given as the only example of a prominent paleoliberal on the page you told me to read. Her name was hyperlinked to her blog. http://tammybruce.com/ Check it out.

You forgot Chris Pohl:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlxSYt9MBC8

and Chris Harms (lead singer):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWMtFGDHffE

Who’s Tammy Bruce?

Carolyn,

That is a misrep of Paleoliberalism. Try this:
http://libertapedia.org/wiki/Paleoliberalism

The only paleoliberal linked to on that page is Tammy Bruce. Clicking on her name takes you to Libertapedia’s page on Bruce. It says:

Tammy Bruce is an author and political commentator. She also hosts a syndicated talk radio show, in the United States. She is described on her website as “an openly gay, pro-choice, gun owning, pro-death penalty, voted-for-President Reagan progressive feminist”. A lifelong Democrat, she is a self-described classical liberal. A paleoliberal, most of her views are sharply at odds with the positions of Democratic or liberal activists, whom have embraced the socialist undertone of most modern liberals.

From 1990 to 1996, Bruce served as president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women (the longest continuous tenure in the chapter’s history) and mobilized activists locally and nationally on a whole range of issues, including women’s image in media, child care, health care, violence against women, economics, and domestic violence.
* * *
So I guess that puts the final pieces of the puzzle of VKC together. Explains why she uses that transvestite singer Bill Kaulitz as her current avatar. She likes him! But I guess none of it ever bothered Deanna.