Comments on: Misconstruing the Jews

By: Mencken

Mencken — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 14:01:37 +0000

This is off topic, I know, but I just stumbled across it and couldn’t put it in a comment where I thought it more relevant, in your podcasts about organ donation, the comments being closed.

http://www.torahmusings.com/2010/11/blood-donations-according-to-halacha/

A brief excerpt:

“One local rabbi recently suggested that there is a prohibition to donate blood to general blood banks (though he acknowledged that there is a mitzvah to donate blood to Jewish causes). In order to refute any such claim it is important to identify precisely which prohibitions may be violated in the course of blood donations.”

Ugh.

To me, more telling than the article itself were the comments, filled with “We shouldn’t be putting this where they can see it” remarks and some even adding parenthetical comments in Hebrew, presumably to mask the inconvenient truth.

Your work, tan, is so well done and so very important. I urge people I talk with to listen because you distill The Question in such a way as to make it not just clear but urgent. Thank you for what you do.

By: truthspeech

truthspeech — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 01:29:38 +0000

To Bill Krapek: The alleged and highly-contested ritual sacrifices by jews of non-jew children is only a small and unnecessary element to make the link you are suggesting. Unlike those allegations, it is undeniable that human sacrifice was widely practiced by the jews during biblical times and that’s what many of those old testament prophets are railing against, i.e. King David and King Solomon both were criticized for participating in the “worship” of the Canaanite god Moloch/Baal to which they threw babies into a fire. This is probably why that habit persisted in secret into historical times among a small jewish elite who kept such disgusting mystical practices, some of which were caught and those accounts come down to us as the ritual murders by blood letting.

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:54:59 +0000

The term race is today associated mainly with continental-scale groupings. In the loosest sense, however, the term race has applied to various groups linked by heredity. The essence of jewishness has always has been hereditary, so in that sense it is perfectly proper to refer to the jews as a race. The semitically correct term today is ethnic group, which means roughly the same thing race meant a hundred years ago, before the predominance of jew-promoted/jew-enforced taboos around any use of the term.

Lazare’s argument was that race must be pure, otherwise it doesn’t exist. Jews make absurd arguments like this to downplay and obscure the hereditary nature of jewishness. What is the purpose of your bald assertion Bob?

By: Bob in DC

Bob in DC — Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:47:40 +0000

Kikejews deny ‘race’ because jews are not a race!

By: Bill Krapek

Bill Krapek — Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:54:25 +0000

A synchronicity today following up on a comment I put on your site last week: I was watching the HBO series True Detective and they’re onto human sacrifice. Naturally all the people doing the sacrificing are Christians. And since I know Jews always project their psycho on us: maybe you should investigate the history of Jewish sacrifice of Christian and Muslim children?

And if it turns out to be bogus, then you can really establish of your bona fides by showing that. But I don’t think it’s going to be bogus. I think it really happened and I think it is still happening.

By: Bill Krapek

Bill Krapek — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:17:43 +0000

I don’t mind being helpful to Jews or Muslims or black people or anyone who’s different. Seriously. I think Christianity is a light the world and we should share that light. But: if you force a choice between me or you, then it’s me.

Every time.

By: Franklin Ryckaert

Franklin Ryckaert — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:49:10 +0000

"...how shall one address "gentiles" collectively?..." Let us call ourselves humans. Thus there is the dichotomy : humans...and jews. The implication is obvious.

By: ulf

ulf — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:42:29 +0000

Note: We get deconstructed quite rapidly. Some weeks ago I came across a lecture which is accusing (they say “revealing”) the famous Immanuel Kant of anti-ZIONISM. Lecturer: Daniel Späth
(I hope the wolve somehow escaped safely without getting killed)