While I appreciate a lot of Carolyn’s work, and disagree with some of it because my perspectives on certain things are quite different, yet I consider her a friend, and never beat her over the head where we have certain disagreements. Neither does she ever try to persuade me in like manner.

Yet I have not listened to a single one of her programs on this matter, because I simply do not have the time. Rather, I only read some of her summaries and went and read the original materials she has located and assessed them for myself.

Therefore I have been totally objective in assessing everything which she has presented on this issue, and I am not biased. If Carolyn were wrong in what I have seen of her summaries of this information, I would gladly tell her, again as a friend. Nobody sways me with either friendship or money, but only with evidence sufficient to establish a proof, or at least beckon a reasonably evidenced refutation.

That is what is most lacking in White Nationalist circles: objectivity. Most of them are no different that the damned Democrats or Republicans, or even the Jews, who all make their decisions based on whether or not someone is on their side or their team.

David, I believe that your defenses of Rodney Martin are biased and short-sighted. I am disappointed that you have taken to attacking the messenger rather than addressing the issues.

If you can address the issues objectively and somehow prove that Carolyn is wrong in the evaluation of what she has found, good! If you cannot, then you should admit that Carolyn is right, and take appropriate action by asking Martin to account honestly for the discrepancies.

It does not matter, David, what you think of Carolyn. Rather, what matters is how Rodney Martin claims to have been a WN advocate for so many years, while in reality he was trying to build a political career by spouting multi-cult drivel and working for the benefit of injuns. And he was doing those things as recently as what, 6 years ago? If Martin ever got elected to office, would any of us have heard of him?

Now any White man can have a change of heart and turn from the error of his ways. But if one wants to be accepted as a leader, one must be honest and talk openly about one’s past, and adequately explain one’s change of heart. Rather than doing that, Martin has simply invented lies and has attempted to smear those who would call him on them.

For my part, I suspected that Martin was not true to the cause when he embraced a certain CI poser and fraud who I believe is actually a liar and a crypto-jew. But that is only my opinion.

Martin is trying to build a name for himself by aggrandizing himself, and by embracing every tired old WN stalwart who never got anywhere because they are all misfits or compromisers.

Any honest man who reads Martin’s description of himself on the ANN website would realize immediately that the guy is a huckster. Truly great men do not brag about themselves. Consider Hitler and his war record as an example. And Martin’s bragging, when examined, is all vain and empty arrogance: there are no real accomplishments there at all.

David, you are riding the wrong horse, and in the wrong corral. Get out of the circus and find the rodeo before its too late.

I really want to leave the ANA-ANN alone, but I think I might soon be attacked in a bad way. But if not, I agree I’ve said enough. If people are not convinced now, they won’t be. BTW, Borsella doesn’t sound like Kevin Strom (who actually has 3 beautiful children who live with him and is not homosexual), but more like a glib-tongued performer who loves hearing his own smooth voice.

Thanks for the reply. Well I certainly understand your feelings and opinion on Borcella after those nasty exchanges. Those remarks are rude, demeaning, and unbecoming of a White Man, especially one who claims to be “proud of his race.” The guy seems to be inexperienced with how to talk to women in general, and especially a proud White Woman as yourself at that :). I’ve never heard him speak so I’ll have to listen to a program of his unfortunately, but if he sounds anything like Kevin Strom I’m totally with you, lol.

Regarding Sunic, yeah I thought that was a little overboard on your part but the rest of his ideas regarding nationalism do not sit well with me either. I myself am of Croation/Serbian ancestry and the one thing i do know definitely is that after we have solved and exiled the Jewish element from our midst as a race, we must have ethnic/nationalist boundaries that are separate from each other. The idea of a pan-European imperium with no boundaries of ethnic states is absurd. I always say to others we can fight amongst ourselves if we really need to AFTER we get rid of the Jewish influence, which i find unnecessary myself as long as we coexist separately you know? But nonetheless for those of us who just like to fight or squabble with one another, at least then it will be all in the family, no pun intended.

Regarding Hitler’s Germany, I understand he had a strong dis-like for Slavs in general, as he wrote about it in his auto-biography. However i do not blame him for that (which many have chastised me for saying that) because he had described growing up in an Austria that was multi-culturalized with Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, etc. But regardless of how he felt about it, I saw the actions of his government speak wider volumes on what kind of leader he really was. What i am referring to of course are the many Waffen-SS divisions which consisted of many eastern European nations fighting against the communists. They were not forced but willingly joined which the Germans gladly accepted. When i had learned about that I had a different view of Hitler altogether from then on, and i had grown to admire that about him. On a side note, My grandfather on my mother’s side had fought for Hitler and the SS in the Croatian division. She would relay to me stories when i asked about it early on in my life of how he would refer to Hitler as “Uncle Hitler” haha, figuratively speaking of course. Back then i couldn’t understand why, but as i learned the real truth I had totally understood. Anyway i’m starting to digress, I apologize about that.

To wrap my comment up, I wouldn’t bother on Martin or Borcella any longer as i think you had covered everything. I believe you said this earlier i think. They can say all the good rhetoric they want about Race and Jews, but they are not brothers of mine, especially Borcella (He does look kind of creepy in that photo now that i think about it). Also I wouldn’t worry about the ANA, I don’t think they have even 10 members between them.. i’m speculating of course but it stands to reason since I’ve never came across that group before. I will also let others know on stormfront and elsewhere to steer clear of that dysfunctional group.

-Michael

You certainly make your criticism easy to take by preceding it with so much positive commenting. 🙂 I think that what you say about Sunic and Borsella being gay or not is perfectly justified. Especially for Sunic. I suppose I should regret letting my private thoughts slip through like that, but I’ve had them for a long time and kept quiet. What thoughts are there want to come out — that sort of thing. But I agree I was wrong to and maybe I should apologize to Tom Sunic for all the mean things I’ve said about him. I do not think highly of him because of his anti-nationalist stance and push for “Europeanism,” (which is explained in my mind by the fact he is Croatian and wishes to be German so if everyone is European, that solves the problem too); an affinity for the Imperium idea; his tolerance of jews and homosexuals among us; and his wishy-washy style. BUT, upon thinking about it now, I cannot point out any sign of homosexual behavior in him. So I was in the wrong to say that.

Borcella is another story. He looks gay, lives like a gay, sounds gay, is impulsively nasty like a gay. He has a problem with women, no question about it, which is more typical with homosexuals than with straight men who are just misogynists. He doesn’t explain any of this either; he is unable to talk about it. I should publish the emails he sent to me a month or two ago, in a queer rage, calling me a “barren,” therefore worthless woman who “probably couldn’t even cook.” In another one, he wrote I should “get in the kitchen, grandma, and make me a sandwich.” And of course he kept calling me a jew. What kind of a man would write to a woman in that way? A psychopath or a queer, in my experience. While it is not hard evidence, it is enough for me. If he is straight, where is the evidence of a single relationship with a female? There is no trace of any.

I believe I used listened to your program and found out about this website a year ago. I kind of took a brake from White nationalist radio programs for a few months but recently I started listening to a few programs again like David Duke, Stormfront, Political Cesspool, etc. I downloaded and listened to this latest Heretics Hour on Friday and found it very interesting to say the least. I’ve thought about it for awhile and have come to a few conclusions.

First off, I think I had only heard of Rod Martin once or twice before when he was a guest on some pro-white program (I can’t remember the name). My first impressions were that he seemed knowledgeable enough and was talking about the Jewish issue quite accurately. However I had no knowledge of the man himself before listening to your show. Now that I have I must applaud you for giving your blunt analysis of the guy and his inconsistencies. I think there are many people in this movement who declare themselves “White Nationalists” or “Pro-White Leaders” who want to endear the public to their organizations or group but they themselves are not forthcoming of their past. Not only that, they all seem to have this quirk of embellishing their history or exaggerating the few accomplishments they have done. It takes courage for someone like yourself to point out his inadequacies as hard as it may be, but it must be done. More of our people should do their research before they even consider joining an organization, and if they find flaws within the leadership, they should not only disregard their consideration for that group, but they should also speak out about it and let others know so they don’t fall into the same trap.

At first I kind of had the same feeling as the caller and comments Jim had made such as to put aside any flaws and work together regardless. However I thought about it more and more and I believe their is a limit to how many flaws or how serious one flaw is to just put it aside and work together with that person. I think everyone has things they are not proud of in their past which is normal, and the majority of us could easily look it over and continue working with them. However if someone does not learn from his or her mistakes and continues to partake in such activities, it certainly isn’t healthy for us to continue working with that individual. Eventually they will unravel and you will find yourself in a place that is worst off from where you started. I say that not as a Carolyn Yeager fan or a Rodney Martin hater, but for someone who has looked at everything objectively.

The only criticism i would have with your recent show is when you made the comment about Tom Sunic possibly being a homosexual. You said something to the effect of “he had many guests who were gay, and that makes you wonder about him.” Now, I can recount many times people have used similar tactics when speaking, mostly Jews ironically, which makes me wonder if that is a trait among them when they attack a certain individual. Anyway, I disagree strongly about making statements like that without any conclusive evidence or proof on the matter. On that note what makes you say Borcella is gay? I’ve never heard of him before your program and it could very well be. But do you have any evidence of that? If so please feel free to let me know. If you like you may e-mail me if you don’t feel comfortable presenting it in a comment. Thanks!

Other than that, I enjoyed your show. I will continue to listen every week. Keep up the good work!

-Michael

Face it “mate”, you yourself ALONE are to be blamed, as well as your “Atlantic Axis” idiots, especially fat Rod with his “Russian flag”, what a joke you all are! What is next, an “Atlantic Russian Axis”, better known as the old communist ALL-LIES.