In this you anticipated where I was going next:

So, I think the word “liberalism” no longer means anything. It doesn’t refer to a coherent ideology. The Jews pretend to be liberals, which they are not. And the White liberals pretend they still believe in something, but they defer to the Jewish agenda and are held tightly in check. The incredible thing is how the non-Jews have accepted to go along with a new agenda that contradicts their former ideals.

Instead of studying liberalism, maybe we should start studying how dictatorship works, and how the whole population of a country can come under the rule of a small hostile minority.

In a nutshell, when people describe “liberalism” as suicidal, what they’re talking about (and denying, consciously or not) is actually the genocidal effect it’s having on Whites. The White “liberals” who aid and abet “liberalism” certainly aren’t suicidal, and neither are the “liberal” jews. Seeing contemporary “liberalism” as a death wish is closer to the truth – in the sense of wishing for someone elses’ death, and making that dream come true.

There seems to be a distinct jewish origin to what little pushback there is within the jew-policed mainstream. The marker is “X isn’t a suicide pact”, eg. where X = “liberalism” or “the constitution”. The jews, including “liberal” jews, aren’t at all trying to destroy themselves or their people, they’re doing it to Whites.

My dictionary defines liberalism as “a political orientation that favors social progress by reform and by changing laws rather than by revolution”. But I think most voters don’t care about that. They are not trying to oppose or speed up “social progress”. They simply want more money for themselves.

Strong ideological beliefs are developed in political circles, not in the general population. So, we have to make a distinction between liberal theories and practical policies. For the voters, the important thing is income redistribution. For the politicized theorists, the important thing is sexual and racial issues. My conclusion is that left-wing political parties probably have both radical activists who try to push gay marriage and race-replacement, and day to day managers who try to stick to the redistribution policies. The reason for their redistribution policies is not an idealistic desire to help the poor. It is simply a way to keep the voters, and to breed more non-Whites.

The media want to create an association in our minds between “the left” and things like diversity and gay marriage. Actually it is an artificial combination. Most Blacks and Whites who vote for the left do not support immigration and same sex marriage. They are not liberal in that way.

When my dictionary says that liberalism is about social progress, it forgets to say that “social progress” has been redefined by the Jews in the last 50 years. Social progress used to be about helping the lower classes who were seen as victims of society and of capitalism. But now, the white lower class has been reclassified as part of the oppressing race. It is targeted for replacement in the name of the new conception of social progress. Many left wing voters still think that social progress is about income redistribution. But in the main political parties, in colleges and in the media, social progress now centers around sexual and racial issues. Also, the Jewish left used to claim that they were the champions of freedom. And now, their priority is to shut us up.

So, I think the word “liberalism” no longer means anything. It doesn’t refer to a coherent ideology. The Jews pretend to be liberals, which they are not. And the White liberals pretend they still believe in something, but they defer to the Jewish agenda and are held tightly in check. The incredible thing is how the non-Jews have accepted to go along with a new agenda that contradicts their former ideals.

Instead of studying liberalism, maybe we should start studying how dictatorship works, and how the whole population of a country can come under the rule of a small hostile minority.

There is a huge cognitive disconnect

It’s a huge cognitive disconnect when you argue by assertion and attempt to insult someone else for not thinking.

I try to judge reality by what I see rather than what others say must be or I must see.

Not so! There is nothing ‘Liberal’ about true Christianity. Katana, you have described jeudeo-christianity which is a masquerade of the real thing and the best religion the jews can buy.

True Christianity found in Christian Identity is patriotic and racially aware. Aware that the jews are not the people of the Old Testament, were never Hebrews or Israelites [who were white] and that Jesus was not a jew.
There is a huge cognitive disconnect when Whites are able to see through jewish lies, deception and hypocrisy in politics, in their global domination and our enslavement and destruction but yet naively accept that the jews are telling the truth about the Bible and their racial origins. The real ‘deeply embedded stupidity’ is that you choose to believe them.

Porter, at The Kakistocracy, describes how it works in practice:

Liberalism is two jews and a black voting on which white to have for lunch;

Conservatism is a well-armed white enforcing the vote.
—
In 1961 the poet Robert Frost remarked:

A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.
——————-

Good quotes there Tan on capturing an essence of the modern liberal.

For me, liberalism, as practiced by Whites across the Western world is a destructive (some call it suicidal) meme that has its roots in our Christian heritage that jews have exploited.

Turn the other cheek, and so on.

Christianity started out as a slave religion, and remains a slave religion, that tells its believers to endure all suffering because they will be rewarded in “heaven” when they die. Such deeply embedded stupidity over so many centuries is why liberalism flourishes and is killing us now.

http://youtu.be/Zd63N7SQgoU