Carolyn wades into the controversy that so many want to bury once and for all — whether the Protocols of the Elders of Zion should be taken seriously or thrown into the trashcan of literary forgeries.

• A search through the Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieufor the alleged parallel passages found in the Protocols leaves much to be desired;
• Only the first two of the three similar passages shown on Wikipedia can be found;
• The narrative of  how the forgery occurred published in The Times is not believable (kind of like the narrative of the ‘Holocaust’);
• More believable is the story of Mlle. Glinka and Alexis Sukhotin, and the Jewish traitor Joseph Schorst;
• The relationship between Maurice Joly (author of “Dialogue”) and Adolphe Cremieux (Grand Master of the Mizraim Lodge and a founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle);
• The Berne, Switzerland trial as a typical legal travesty that Jews always resort to;
• Layers of disinformation and confusion make the trail to the truth about the Protocols difficult, but investigation should be undertaken;
• Fear of Jewish retribution is a big reason Whites stay away from the topic, or are satisfied with a non-committal stand.

Image: The original article “exposing the forgery” in The Times of London from August 1921.