Ann Coulter’s rhetoric about immigration has become increasingly radical since I quoted her in Morality and Identity:

While conservatives have been formulating carefully constructed arguments, liberals have been playing a long-term game to change the demographics of America to get an electorate more to their liking.

There’s a strange asymmetry in how this matter can be discussed. Liberals and ethnic activists boast about how America would be better if it were more Latino, but no one else is allowed to say, “We like the ethnic mix as it is.”

That would be racist. By now no one even tries to disagree.

Identity Politics is based on a very simple rule: White = “racism” = bad, non-White = “diversity” = good.

Latinos will pass whites as majority ethnicity in California in March, Daily Sundial (California State University at Northridge), 4 March 2014:

In Gov. Jerry Brown’s 2014-2015 budget summary, Latinos were projected to eclipse whites as the plurality, or largest racial/ethnic group, in the state by a margin of 39 percent to 38.8 percent, respectively, this month.

Melina Abdullah, Pan-African studies chair at CSULA, agrees the change is significant as it is a more realistic representation of global demographics.

“It’s more reflective of the global society we live in,” Abdullah said. “We have been conditioned to think the white majority is normal, but if we look globally, the majority is people of color.”

The usual “liberal” argument that is “majorities” must defer to and defend “minorities”. Whites have long been a minority globally. Now that we’re being reduced to minorities everywhere the true, anti-White nature of the usual line of argument is revealed.

“Every study has signaled the importance of ethnic studies,” Abdullah said. “The idea that we should have an ethnic studies requirement becomes even more urgent as we have an increasing number of people of color in the state.”

The less Whites, the more urgent and required the indoctrination in favor of less Whites becomes.

“It’s important that we live in a diverse world and you want to understand the racial dynamic, the gender dynamic and the politics of sexuality that are going on,” Masequesmay said. “It will make a more humane citizen of the world, instead of just protecting your own interests at the expense of others. You see how you are implicated in the system of social injustice.”

Abdullah agreed with Masequesmay and also believes the benefits are not limited to traditionally underrepresented ethnic groups.

“It’s true for the success of not only people of color, but also the success of white students who need to have, not only a tolerance for, but an understanding of, people of color,” Abdullah said.

Addressing the Individual Needs of the Latino Plurality

Ayala-Alcantar believes the ethnic studies debate, which was not supported by the CSULA Chicano studies program, illustrates the difference in opinion and background among members of the group.

“It highlights the point that we’re a very diverse group,” Ayala-Alcantar said. “Not all Latinos are in support of the ethnic studies or even know what it means to be a Chicano.”

Whites are “diverse” in a similar sense. But in spite of their “diversity”, non-Whites manage to think and organize as a non-White bloc.

About 65 percent of full-time faculty are white, compared to the 10.7 percent of full-time faculty that are Latino.

“It’s happening more in the K-12 system than higher education,” Ayala-Alcantar said. “If you look here are CSUN, the majority of professors are white males.”

While CSUN’s faculty profile does not accurately reflect the students it serves, Abdullah says the problem is reflected throughout the CSU system.

“People of color are really underrepresented,” Abdullah said. “On my campus alone, of the almost 600 tenured or tenure-track faculty members, there are only 17 black faculty. The numbers for latinos are about double, but still a huge underrepresentation when talking about 90 percent students of color.”

While Pardo understands the challenges the traditionally underserved face in the hiring process, she is still hopeful that talking about the issues can lead to some reform, especially on campus.

“We definitely have resistance, but it’s important to get the dialogue going and hopefully we’ll move forward with some changes,” Pardo said. “As we look at the demographic profile here at Northridge, which we know is 10 percent ‘Hispanic’ faculty, we’re a Hispanic-serving institution, so that’s something we definitely need to change.”

Did I Move?, Ann Coulter, 12 Feb 2014:

We’re living in a different country now, and I can’t recall moving! Had I wanted to live in Japan, I could have moved there. Had I had wanted to live in Mexico, Pakistan or Chechnya — I could have moved to those places, too.

(Although maybe not. They all have stricter immigration policies than we do.)

I’m sure they’re lovely, but I wanted to live in America. Now I can’t. At the current rate of immigration, it won’t exist anymore. The Democrats couldn’t win elections there, so they changed it.

Coulter’s statements at the Conservative Political Action Conference this past weekend sparked controversy.

I’ve Never Seen Evidence GOP Hates Black People Until I Read Rubio’s ‘Amnesty’ Bill:

“I mean my whole life I’ve heard Republicans hate black people, I’ve never seen any evidence of it until I read Marco Rubio’s amnesty bill. We are the party that has always stood up for African-Americans. Who gets hurt the most by amnesty, by continuing these immigration policies it is low-wage workers, it is hispanics, it is blacks.”

If Immigration Reform Passes, ‘Organize The Death Squads For The People Who Wrecked America’:

Coulter attacked MSNBC for “celebrating the browning of America.” “But if you don’t celebrate it you’re a racist,” she added. “It’s going to be people who are not from America who are going to be in theory funding older, white people who are getting to their Social Security and Medicare age. I don’t think that can last, at some point they’re going to say, ‘Screw it.’”

“I used to think everything was about sex, now I realize everything is about immigration,” she added later.

Coulter ended with this call to arms: “Amnesty is forever and you got to vote for the Republicans one more time and just make it clear; but if you pass amnesty, that’s it, it’s over and then we organize the death squads for the people who wrecked America.”

Why wait? The destruction has been going on for decades. Coulter seems to be trying to grapple with it, but remains determined to see it through a deracinated left/right, liberal/conservative, Democrat/Republican lens. She has yet to acknowledge WHO is wrecking WHOM.

Whites who are as alarmed as Coulter is about immigration should educate themselves by reading Kevin MacDonald’s Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review. Coulter, as a friend Joe Sobran, probably already knows this, and where she’s heading.

“The International Jew” Study Hour presents:   Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott read and comment on Chapter 80, “An Address to “Gentiles” on the Jewish Question.”

The FINAL CHAPTER of The International Jew is not only a reminder  of the unity of Jews (which is the basis of their strength) vs. the disunity of “Gentiles,” but also an exhortation to the “superior strain” of the non-Jewish races  to liberate itself from the influence of Jewish Orientalism.

• Our Race, the White European “superior strain,” must unite in the moral and religious principles that made our race great to begin with;
• The solution to the Jewish Question will begin in the United States, but not by the mass of people but by a sufficient number of qualified people who are not timid or soft;
• Unrestricted immigration of ideas has been as bad for the American mentality as unrestricted immigration of people is bad for American society;
• “The Chosen People” is one of two great biblical ideas, but Jews are not that people – the House of Israel and the House of Judah are distinct to this day;
• The solution at this stage is to disengage from, to eschew the poisonous ideas and entertainments that Jewry offers to us.

Image:  In approximately 930 B.C.E., the short-lived United Monarchy, which ruled over all the tribes of Israel, was divided into two kingdoms: Israel in the north, led by Jeroboam son of Nebat, and Judea in the South, led by Rehoboam the son of Solomon.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Andrew Anglin tells of his first few weeks in Athens, where he is getting along famously and meeting European tourists from all over the world because of his out-going personality. He attended the recent food distribution rally in front of Golden Dawn headquarters and watched Ilias Kasidiaris moving among the people.  We also discussed Andrew’s new, very successful news site Daily Stormer. Some specifics of the conversation:

• Athens is more P.C. free than the U.S. and Western Europe;
• Meetings 2 or 3 times a week at Golden Dawn headquarters attract normal, working-class people to socialize and hear educational speeches, some of whom were already familiar with his website Total Fascism;
• Andrew estimates that immigrants make up 30-50% of the population in Athens and are generally degenerate, with the Bangladeshi and Turks being the most civilized;
• Golden Dawn members of parliament give approximately 4/5 of their pay to support GD party expenses and charity work;
• In today’s world, Democracy is a sham that facilitates Internationalism and unrestricted immigration, leading to race-mixing;
• Mark Glenn and Joe Klein represent two anti-White points of view – one Muslim and the other Jewish;
• And much more.

“The International Jew” Study Hour presents:  Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott  read and comment on Chapter 42, “The Present Status of the Jewish Question.”

We are at the half-way point of  “The International Jew” – the end of Volume Two of four volumes – and the level of Jewish influence in America is examined and  judged. Some highlights:

• Our growing weakness for applause and “boosterism” over straight talk and facts;
• TIJ takes credit for the word “Jew” to now (in 1921) be spoken aloud and printed in newspapers;
• Jewish leaders of today are in fear of further exposure – such as that they are the best organized people in the entire world, better than any government;
• Jewish solidarity is largely anti-American, for example having the goal of weakening recognition of the Christian Sunday, while strengthening recognition of the Jewish Saturday Sabbath;
• All antisemitism is the creation of Jewish leaders, and the charge is used as a last resort when confronted with the truth;
• Jews do not believe in free speech or in a free press, they continue to press for laws to prevent any derogatory statements about Jews. [Today called “hate” laws.]

Image:  Stereotypical  sneaky Jewish “moneybags” who knows he is is an alien presence in a Gentile society, and up to no good.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

“The International Jew” Study Hour presents:  Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager read and comment on Chapter 41, “Jews Use the Peace Conference to Bind Poland.”

This chapter starts out with “trouble between Jews and other people is a continuous situation.” Naturally the huge number of Jews in Poland – as much as 10% of the population at that time – caused trouble for the Poles. International Jewry propagandized sporadic Polish reaction into “persecution” of tens of thousands – facilitating the entry of a quarter of a million Jews from Poland into the United States in a short period of time. The background information of why Poles acted as they did is given, along with how the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 gave the Jews of Poland everything they wanted. The chapter asks if the United States will do the same.

Image: Deliberations taking place at the Paris Peace Conference, dictated to by victorious France, England and the United States. Jews were said to be much in evidence.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.

Brad Love of Alberta, Canada, an oil field worker and outspoken White patriot tells us about his 10-year battle with the courts over his habit of writing letters to elected officials, newspapers and tax-exempt organizations.  He is currently fighting his last conviction of May 2012 for a minor probation violation and for sending material in the mail to Hillel, B’nai B’rith, the Canadian Jewish Congress and York University Student Union in conjunction with End Israeli Apartheid Week. For this he was recently sentenced to 18 months in prison. Some of the topics discussed:

• Over the past 20 years, Love has written over 10,000 letters;
• In 2003 he was sentenced to 18 months jail time under Canada’s Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code (“hate law”);
• In 2006 he was ordered to serve 3-years probation with the stipulation he not write to anybody unless personally requested to do so;
• Love estimates he has spent 2 1/2 years in incarceration already;
• He objects to these restrictions on his free expression based on his being a hard-working, tax-paying Canadian-born citizen who has the right to express his thoughts and concerns;
• Because he works and earns a good income, he is not eligible for legal aid; all his expenses come out of his own pocket.

Brad Love does not have a website or an email address. The newspapers won’t write a word about him! The vicious anti-racists hate him! You can read a few things at CAFE (Canadian Association for Free Expression).

Hadding Scott and Carolyn Yeager complete Chapter 5 from last week.

Reading and commentary on the second half of  Chapter 5, “Anti-Semitism – Will It Appear in the U.S.?”

Pictured right:  In the early 20th Century in Russia, Jewish agitation, plotting, terrorism and assassinations resulted in pogroms  against the Jews by the Czars and Russian people. However, “impartial observers have also found that some of the outbreaks have been precipitated by the Jews themselves.” This kind of activity never appeared in the United States.

Note: We are using the Noontide Press publication of The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem which can be found online here as a pdf file.