Ann Coulter’s rhetoric about immigration has become increasingly radical since I quoted her in Morality and Identity:
While conservatives have been formulating carefully constructed arguments, liberals have been playing a long-term game to change the demographics of America to get an electorate more to their liking.
There’s a strange asymmetry in how this matter can be discussed. Liberals and ethnic activists boast about how America would be better if it were more Latino, but no one else is allowed to say, “We like the ethnic mix as it is.”
That would be racist. By now no one even tries to disagree.
Identity Politics is based on a very simple rule: White = “racism” = bad, non-White = “diversity” = good.
Latinos will pass whites as majority ethnicity in California in March, Daily Sundial (California State University at Northridge), 4 March 2014:
In Gov. Jerry Brown’s 2014-2015 budget summary, Latinos were projected to eclipse whites as the plurality, or largest racial/ethnic group, in the state by a margin of 39 percent to 38.8 percent, respectively, this month.
Melina Abdullah, Pan-African studies chair at CSULA, agrees the change is significant as it is a more realistic representation of global demographics.
“It’s more reflective of the global society we live in,” Abdullah said. “We have been conditioned to think the white majority is normal, but if we look globally, the majority is people of color.”
The usual “liberal” argument that is “majorities” must defer to and defend “minorities”. Whites have long been a minority globally. Now that we’re being reduced to minorities everywhere the true, anti-White nature of the usual line of argument is revealed.
“Every study has signaled the importance of ethnic studies,” Abdullah said. “The idea that we should have an ethnic studies requirement becomes even more urgent as we have an increasing number of people of color in the state.”
The less Whites, the more urgent and required the indoctrination in favor of less Whites becomes.
“It’s important that we live in a diverse world and you want to understand the racial dynamic, the gender dynamic and the politics of sexuality that are going on,” Masequesmay said. “It will make a more humane citizen of the world, instead of just protecting your own interests at the expense of others. You see how you are implicated in the system of social injustice.”
Abdullah agreed with Masequesmay and also believes the benefits are not limited to traditionally underrepresented ethnic groups.
“It’s true for the success of not only people of color, but also the success of white students who need to have, not only a tolerance for, but an understanding of, people of color,” Abdullah said.
Addressing the Individual Needs of the Latino Plurality
Ayala-Alcantar believes the ethnic studies debate, which was not supported by the CSULA Chicano studies program, illustrates the difference in opinion and background among members of the group.
“It highlights the point that we’re a very diverse group,” Ayala-Alcantar said. “Not all Latinos are in support of the ethnic studies or even know what it means to be a Chicano.”
Whites are “diverse” in a similar sense. But in spite of their “diversity”, non-Whites manage to think and organize as a non-White bloc.
About 65 percent of full-time faculty are white, compared to the 10.7 percent of full-time faculty that are Latino.
“It’s happening more in the K-12 system than higher education,” Ayala-Alcantar said. “If you look here are CSUN, the majority of professors are white males.”
While CSUN’s faculty profile does not accurately reflect the students it serves, Abdullah says the problem is reflected throughout the CSU system.
“People of color are really underrepresented,” Abdullah said. “On my campus alone, of the almost 600 tenured or tenure-track faculty members, there are only 17 black faculty. The numbers for latinos are about double, but still a huge underrepresentation when talking about 90 percent students of color.”
While Pardo understands the challenges the traditionally underserved face in the hiring process, she is still hopeful that talking about the issues can lead to some reform, especially on campus.
“We definitely have resistance, but it’s important to get the dialogue going and hopefully we’ll move forward with some changes,” Pardo said. “As we look at the demographic profile here at Northridge, which we know is 10 percent ‘Hispanic’ faculty, we’re a Hispanic-serving institution, so that’s something we definitely need to change.”
Did I Move?, Ann Coulter, 12 Feb 2014:
We’re living in a different country now, and I can’t recall moving! Had I wanted to live in Japan, I could have moved there. Had I had wanted to live in Mexico, Pakistan or Chechnya — I could have moved to those places, too.
(Although maybe not. They all have stricter immigration policies than we do.)
I’m sure they’re lovely, but I wanted to live in America. Now I can’t. At the current rate of immigration, it won’t exist anymore. The Democrats couldn’t win elections there, so they changed it.
Coulter’s statements at the Conservative Political Action Conference this past weekend sparked controversy.
I’ve Never Seen Evidence GOP Hates Black People Until I Read Rubio’s ‘Amnesty’ Bill:
“I mean my whole life I’ve heard Republicans hate black people, I’ve never seen any evidence of it until I read Marco Rubio’s amnesty bill. We are the party that has always stood up for African-Americans. Who gets hurt the most by amnesty, by continuing these immigration policies it is low-wage workers, it is hispanics, it is blacks.”
If Immigration Reform Passes, ‘Organize The Death Squads For The People Who Wrecked America’:
Coulter attacked MSNBC for “celebrating the browning of America.” “But if you don’t celebrate it you’re a racist,” she added. “It’s going to be people who are not from America who are going to be in theory funding older, white people who are getting to their Social Security and Medicare age. I don’t think that can last, at some point they’re going to say, ‘Screw it.’”
“I used to think everything was about sex, now I realize everything is about immigration,” she added later.
Coulter ended with this call to arms: “Amnesty is forever and you got to vote for the Republicans one more time and just make it clear; but if you pass amnesty, that’s it, it’s over and then we organize the death squads for the people who wrecked America.”
Why wait? The destruction has been going on for decades. Coulter seems to be trying to grapple with it, but remains determined to see it through a deracinated left/right, liberal/conservative, Democrat/Republican lens. She has yet to acknowledge WHO is wrecking WHOM.
Whites who are as alarmed as Coulter is about immigration should educate themselves by reading Kevin MacDonald’s Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review. Coulter, as a friend Joe Sobran, probably already knows this, and where she’s heading.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Coulter’s views on race are as problematic as her views on everything else. She’s controversial for the sake of being offensive and making a profit. See the new book, Never Trust Ann Coulter – at ANY Age, at http://www.coulterwatch.com/never.pdf.
I posted this on Irish Savant and and Western Spring sites. I think it is of interest to all here.
I came across some videos of the Australia First Party Conference 2008 that contained the following speech given by Dr Jim Saleam.
It’s here at: AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY CONFERENCE 2008 Part 2
Here’s the interesting part, around the 22 min mark:
“And the enemies we face, … you listened to the speakers this morning, … The enemies you face actually has the intention of taking your country off you. In fact he has already done it. Effectively he’s already done it.
Now this is an enemy that isn’t mucking around here. He’s actually quite serious. He actually intends to do exactly what it is he is doing.
Some people here, and we have talked about it in private meetings, and this is now an issue of our theory rather than our sociology.
If you look at the issue of morality and moral evil here, for a moment. And we ask, “What is their ultimate aim?”
Arthur Caldwell, who was a great protagonist of immigration after the Second World War, albeit White immigration, and also a great rearguard fighter between 1966, seven, until his death, ’74, I think Arthur died.
He said, that they actually intend to open Australia to re-colonisation. That’s the aim. And he said, “Don’t believe them when they talk about, oh, a few qualified people coming here. That’s not the aim.”
He said, “I know them. I know them!”
“I know what they plan. I know what they think.”
And there’s the old principle, that Arthur Conan Doyle, who wrote Sherlock Holmes, said: “That when you eliminate everything, whatever is left, regardless of how improbable it looks, must be the truth.
The enemy in Australia actually intends that the White race will disappear off the Australia continent. That’s what the enemy wants! That’s the scheme. There’s no other possible scheme that makes any sense in terms of what’s being done and how it’s being operated.
In other words, and let’s put this back into politics, the people who “rule” you, and the people who attempt to “fool” you, actually intend to genocide you.
And when you get a group of people who intend to do that, … they’re not exactly reasonable.
You are not dealing … with reasonable people. They appear to be reasonable, but they are not reasonable.”
I wonder who these people could be. Could it be the “Nose People”, more properly known as the, “People of the Nose”?
Peter, the coulterwatch.com critique of Coulter is that she’s an arrogant, narcissistic boor – which is true enough. Their complaint is that she has hoodwinked Christians and conservatives and makes them look bad. The problem for Whites, however, is that the institutions of Christianity and conservativism, which in George Lincoln Rockwell’s day could still be seen optimistically as expressions of and somewhat aligned with White interests, are today increasingly obviously detached from and even at odds with White racial interests.
Immigration harms Christianity and conservativism only indirectly, to the extent Whites are displaced, dispossessed, demoralized and disempowered. The destruction is perpetrated by a motley coalition of anti-Whites, led by the jews, animated by and openly organized to pursue their own interests.
I’ve heard and read that Coulter has “Jungle Fever” and “dates” negroes almost exclusively.
Ever hear about the book “Camp of the Saints”? That Pan-African studies guy, and his argument that the American population should reflect the population “globally” sounds like something straight out of that book.
After I graduated High School my intention was to play in a rock band and be a musician, and my fall back plan was I could always get a job pumping gas.
Within 3 to 5 years, all those gas stations and mom and pop stores in my area were taken over by foreigners. Thus my fall back plan was destroyed.
There’s an Hollywood movie entitled “American History x”; the entire first hour of the movie shows exactly what has become of America, but then of course, in the second pat of the movie the JEWS introduce their brainwashing BS. Yet, what is very different about this movie is the ending.
The ending basically reinforces the grievances that we as White folk experience every day in America today. America, a country founded by and for our people only i.e White people.
“Christianity and conservativism, which in George Lincoln Rockwell’s day could still be seen optimistically as expressions of and somewhat aligned with White interests, are today increasingly obviously detached from and even at odds with White racial interests.”
Yes. Absolutely. The Christian machinery in the West has been hijacked by the Jews. I see that in my Catholic Bible’s footnotes – New American Bible, Revised Edition (2011). I came across a LOT of Jewish arguments pushed there that weren’t identified as Jewish. That’s an old crypto game, as you know.
But I got my Y-Chromosome test results a couple of days ago, and I’m a J2a. And this result has helped me pull together some very odd observations I’ve made about the Old Testament in the past few months.
(Bear with me!)
J2a is an old Aryan strand which you can find among the Brahmin in India and was also carried by the Etruscans; who ruled Rome when she was still a small village. It’s also found among the Greeks and the Romans. Its highest proportion in Europe is on Crete. The Etruscans taught the Romans how to build religious institutions.They were very good with religious systems. It’s not a coincidence that the Pope is in Italy. They also taught the Romans divination. And its on J2a Crete that you find the Minotaur.
Ancestry.com calls the J2a’s “The Cultivators.” That’s true. But I think a better description is “The Priests.” I see that in my own life, where I’ve been big time into C.G. Jung for years. And scary good at divining.
So guess who else is J2a? About 15% of Jewish Cohans! But about 50% of them are J1s; a branch of the J family that went south. The Semites are J1’s. So who are the real Cohans?
The J2a’s. Guarantee it. We now know from archaeology that Solomon’s Temple was Hittite. We found its predecessor at Ain Dara; just northeast of Aleppo in Syria. This is at the northern tip of the trade route between Jerusalem and Babylon. I can also guarantee you the prophet Ezekiel, a member of the priestly line who was exiled to Babylon, visited the remains of that temple on the way to Babylon. It had been destroyed by the Assyrians about a 150 years before. “Ezekiel” is full of fantastic creatures; along with a vision of Spiritual Israel and its Temple. Ain Dara clearly had a big impact on him and influenced his visions.
Also, Deuteronomy is written in a Hittite treaty form; in this case between God and Israel.
(These treaties date from the second millennia BC. So scholars who tell you Deuteronomy was a forgery written in the Iron age centuries later are full of crap. I suspect they’re trying to cover up Israel’s true roots.)
So this is how I know who the real Cohans are: the Hittites were Aryan. And I’d bet good money that the name Aaron, whose descendants became priests in Jerusalem, means Aryan. It’s therefore not a coincidence that they would put together a series of books as incredibly sophisticated as the Pentateuch – and right on through Judges and on into 1 Kings and 2 Kings. Just compare those to the pathetic Semitic counterparts of 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles, and all the Maccabees. The decline in spiritual and psychological sensitivity is profound. In fact I would call 1 and 2 Chronicles outright tone-deaf. And that was another thing I noticed but was at a loss to explain.
(And by the way: I’d also said for quite a while that that you don’t actually see recognizable Jews until Maccabees. But once again I was at a loss to explain what had happened. Until now.)
The Priests of Israel also cast a couple of mysterious objects called the Urim and the Thummin whenever they were stumped and needed to see what God’s will was.
Divination and Religion. A J2a speciality.
So. Yes. The Jews have stolen Christianity. In the West – but NOT in Russia. But it wouldn’t be the first time they’ve hijacked an Aryan religion. And thus we see the real reason they hate Christianity: their Semitic leaders must have been horrified to see the religion they thought they’d slain get resurrected among Aryans and Europeans in general. It was a disaster that they’ve only lately recovered from.
Also: I can now tell you exactly why the Israelites – the REAL Israelites – were enslaved in Egypt. The Hittites had become a powerful rival for Egypt in the north, and their brethren in Egypt were probably viewed as natural fifth columnists. And who ruled Egypt at the time? The Hyksos.
Centuries later, the Semitic Muslims would kidnap and enslave almost two million Aryans on the Mediterranean. And the Jews – of course – have been big in the slave trade since the Roman Empire; where they were infamous for that. They are also infamous for their domination of the African slave trade.
The Jews probably hijacked the religion after the Babylonian exile; which had nearly annihilated the bloodline of Aaron. This is probably where all those J1’s come from. That and the time of Herod; who was also a Semite. An Edomite, specifically (Idumaean). One of the most hated enemies of the Israelites.
So you see why the Israelites were so racist? And why their God was horrified they were marrying Canaanites like the Jews? They’re a pack of dogs going back to their own vomit over and over again. They can’t help it.
And apparently they cannot be redeemed.
My (admittedly amateur) understanding of the genetic origins of Europeans is that the traces of the original hunter-gatherer settlers of Europe are visible in I1 and I2.
These original Europeans were invaded and conquered by at least two major waves of Aryans, the traces of whom are visible in R1a and R1b.
J1 and J2 are more closely related to each other than they are to any of the above. Your suggestion that J2 is the Aryanest of Aryan is at odds not only with the association of that term with R1, but also with J2’s genetic connection to J1, the jewiest of jews. This genetic connection explains the shared mental/religiosity traits you describe better than any of your handwaving concerning whether J1 or J2 “are the real Cohans” based on tendentious interpretations of J-originated scripture. Whatever the truth, it’s not that J2 is Aryan.
As the J2 link above notes:
Or, more bluntly, the DNA evidence reinforces the hypothesis of jewish parasitism, which dates back to and includes riding the backs of the Aryans.
As to your claim that the jews “stole” Christianity, the reality here seems to be that contemporary Christian Identitists wish to simply set aside the New Testament and subsequent European adaptations and accretions which have always comprised what has been called Christianity, steal Old Testament/Torah judaism from the jews, and relabel that as Christianity.
No more Republicans or Democrats for me, and that includes the Ann Coulters. Thanks Carolyn. Happy St. Patrick’s.
I’ll never claim the J2a’s were the main branch of Aryans. Among Brahman priests we’re clearly a minor branch. But we are nevertheless everywhere you find Aryans, and most are probably Aryan/White in the nuclear DNA. Which is exactly what I am. And nobody ever called us parasites. We tend to be more symbiotic – the flip side of parasitic. We’re the Cultivators. Not the Fungi.
But J2 is in no way Semitic. We split from that southern line thousands of years ago.
The scriptures and archaeology are parallel to the Aryan culture. That’s clear as a bell. There’s nothing to “read” into that.
I haven’t given much thought to haplogroups until recently when I got my 23andme.com results and wondered what significance if any to attach to my I2-ness (on both sides)?
In human genetics, the haplogroups most commonly studied are Y-chromosome (Y-DNA) haplogroups and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroups, both of which can be used to define genetic populations.
Bill Krapek and Tan both suggest that haplogroups code for charcteristics.
What I don’t understand is why Y-DNA (which I believe I inherited from my father from his father from his father and so on ad inf.) and mtDNA (from my mother via her mother and her mother before that etc.) is any more important than whatever coding I inherited from, say, my father’s mother’s father’s mother’s father’s … contribution (where every possible combination like this vastly outnubers the Y and mt DNA).
Isn’t it the the sum total of our ancestors and how they combined that makes us, or our ethnic groups, what we are?
Is it merely that Y and mt-DNA are more easily identified by genetic testing, or that these haplogroups tell a more simplified picture of ancient human migrations? Or is there indeed something special about Y and mt-DNA?
My 23andme results: http://songlight-for-dawn.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/23andmecom-results.html
Though yDNA and mtDNA carry a relatively small amount of any one person’s traits, their significance, I think, is as an indicator for what’s likely in the aDNA.
yDNA and mtDNA are given such prominence because they are passed down intact, which is why they are easier to track back in time. The aDNA, being a blend from both parents, is harder to track because it becomes a hash in a few generations. The key is that both types of DNA tend, within a relatively homogenous population, to follow each other.
That said, I agree with your point that it is more valid to associate characteristics (heritable traits) with aDNA, if known.
If it were a snake it would have bit me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chariot [The map at the top is completely contradicted by the actual text, BTW.]
Boom. Boom. Boom.
We J2a’s had the chariots. The R1B’s had the horses. We were the brains. They were the muscle. They were the “swoop in and conquer.” We were the “stay and build.” They were the hard exterior. We were the chewy center. A beautiful, classic symbiotic relationship.
So this tells us where the Aryans came from: the Steppes of Russia or Anatolia? They came from both.
But we were the smarter ones. You’ll still find us in Israel and Italy and Crete building civilization without them. And that also explains the fact that in India a J2a is a certain predictor of highest caste and an R1B is not. There are no J2a’s in the lowest castes.
And how about those Central African R1B’s?!!
Thank you, Tan, that helps.
As for the Exodus, here’s a real Christian answer to those smart-ass “scholars” who assure you there’s no evidence it happened. That’s a flat out lie.
It’s really a laugh when we get a lecture from them about how the Bible is wrong about Jericho falling in the Late Bronze Age 1 Period (1400). They insist it fell about 1550 BC. Well if it fell in the Middle Bronze Age why is it full of pottery from Late Bronze Age 1?!
Unmentioned here is the Book of the Heavenly Cow, or The Destruction of Mankind.
This first shows up in Egyptian tombs in 1350 BC. Which tells me it was probably compiled and written about 1400 BC, right at the time of Joshua’s conquest. As you may know, the entire generation of Israelites in the Exodus died in the desert, so when the book was written there was a “plausible” spiritual explanation for the disaster that had hit Egypt. This was their way of coming to grips with that humiliation. We have the allusion to all the gold and silver the Israelites left Egypt with. Ra calls himself “I Am that I Am” in many translations. But there are a ton of I Am statements here – Moses’ announcements are clearly still ringing in their heads. We have two of the big plagues – the Darkness and the Nile turning to blood. We’ve got blasphemers killed in the desert and/or in the mountains. (The Sinai and the mountains of Israel; i.e. Mount Zion. Though topologically hills, actually. Different translators translate the text either way.) You’ve even got the Golden Calf. J2a’s are big time into the Cult of the Bull, and the power of Yahweh was to rest on the back of Aaron’s bull; just as Ra rests on the back of the goddess Nut. Later the northern Kingdom of Israel would have two bulls: one in the southern capital of Samaria, and the other in the northern High Place of Dan.
These are NOT Semites.
After the Joshua’s spectacular conquest these ratiocinations didn’t hold water anymore. The direct result of that – obviously! – is the monotheism of Akhenaten.
It really is a open and shut case.
But the Jews are still liars. They aren’t descendants of Abraham and they didn’t endure the pains of slavery in Egypt. My J2a brethren did (even though my own direct ancestors at the time were probably in Crete.)
But then you do:
Again, you’re arguing that J2s were/are the Aryanest of the Aryans. And again, that’s at odds with their closer genetic connection to jews (then and now).
Your description of the past reminds me of how some dissemblers (many of whom are also dissumulators) describe the more recent dispensation between Whites and jews. In one breath they claim jews are White, and in the next that jews are smarter/better/more important. They also misidentify the parasitic relationship as symbiotic.
A symbiotic relationship is mutually beneficial. Both participants thrive. One participant disguising itself as the other and benefiting at the expense of the other is more indicative of parasitism. Obfuscation on this point serves the parasite.