“Let him work.” – Carolyn Yeager

Note: Several UPDATES have been attached at the end of this page:

• 30 April 2014
• 30 April 2014 #2
• 1 May 2014
• 20 May 2014
• 28 June 2014
• 25 Aug 2015
• 9 Sep 2015
• 22 Jul 2016
• 6 Nov 2017
• 24 Jan 2019

This site is dedicated to what the White network was originally about, motivated by a desire and hope for the information here to continue serving and educating White people.

With the exception of this page and a few other minor changes, the contents of this site are a copy of the now defunct thewhitenetwork.com, as it stood on the evening of 15 April 2014, its last day of active operation. Old URLs can be “fixed” by changing http://thewhitenetwork.com/ to / – i.e., by simply inserting “-archive” before the “.com” Search engines will eventually figure out that the site has moved.

What happened?

In short, tWn started and operated for almost two years as a joint project, the product of a partnership between Carolyn Yeager and myself. I ended that project and partnership when it became clear to me that the mutual understanding and trust on which it was based had ended. The comments attached below flesh out how this happened, documenting why tWn is no longer accessible at it’s original location and why this archive exists instead.

On 15 April 2014 I posted My Mistake and The End to explain that I had changed my mind, decided to end my partnership with and support for Carolyn, and why I sought to use what control I had over the server to change tWn into a read-only archive. Within 24 hours Carolyn used her control over the hosting account to redirect the DNS for thewhitenetwork.com to carolynyeager.net, effectively taking the original site offline. That server and its files remained accessible via its old IP address for less than 24 more hours before it stopped responding.

During this time Carolyn posted Meltdown for Tanstaafl at her blog (I refer to this below as her melodrama-down) and left several comments on tWn – The End at my blog. Almost all of the comments quoted below were copied from one of these two pages.

Especially now in retrospect, the disagreement between Carolyn and myself is easy to explain. Carolyn thought tWn was literally all about her. I did not. She thought my support and participation was unconditional and irrevocable. I did not. I regarded the tWn About page as the basis for our partnership. It was my assumption that she agreed on this point. This is what motivated me to actively support her and her work in the first place. It was only when I saw her becoming increasingly hostile to this point that I lost any desire to continue working with and supporting her. Once this happened I made as swift and clean an end to our partnership as possible. The fruit of our project I have worked to preserve.

Carolyn’s response was also swift, but vindictive and dishonest as well. She quickly moved to delete the explanation I had made of our dispute and what I had done, even though to do so she had to take down the rest of tWn along with it. She then melodramatically mischaracterized our disagreement as a one-sided “meltdown” “out of left field”, and impugned my motives and actions as petty, paranoid, bullshit, beserk (sic), dishonest, devious, irresponsible, criminally unfair, and even treasonous. I’m confident that more hysterical accusations are yet to come.

One of Carolyn’s themes has been to make gossipy comments that I previously told her this or that in private, or won’t say this or that in public. Beside substantiating my doubts about her trustworthiness, these are arrogant attempts to speak for me, as if she knows my mind better than I do.

Another of Carolyn’s themes is, “Tan changed”. Indeed. My opinion about Carolyn changed. My trust in her evaporated. For her however this “Tan changed” idea plays into her assertions that she did nothing wrong, because it was Tan that is totally wrong, because he changed his opinion about Carolyn. This too is arrogant – ignoring or contradicting the reasons I’ve actually provided and instead annointing herself as the moral keystone I’m supposedly guilty of violating.

In an attempt to demonstrate how nasty I am, Carolyn unwittingly provided yet another good example of her own arrogance, trying to dictate how or where I could express my opinion:

[4/11/2014 6:56:45 PM] Carolyn Yeager: You know, Tan, I am not too happy about being grilled by you on my own program comments. It really seems you could speak to me privately before you go on the attack in public. … no answer …

This statement and more contradict Carolyn’s portrayal of our disagreement as a sudden one-sided overreaction by me, made solely in response to her White Nationalism, Eurasianism, and the future of Western Europe program on the 12th. In her melodrama-down she explicitly identified me as the sole source of the problem, which she claimed “came straight out of left field”. We see here though that on the 11th she was already identifying our disagreement as an “attack” and scolding me for it. As I pointed out in My Mistake, it was Carolyn’s trashing of White nationalism that precipitated our disagreement. This traces back to written comments she made at least as far as the 5th (see the comments of HTT – Episode 5). I think indications actually go back months earlier to more nebulous on-air statements expressing her distaste for White nationalism as a label, though I don’t recall which specific program(s).

Carolyn also complained about “White PC”, and she linked it to her trashing of White nationalism. She had directly named only one person as being guilty of this offense. Myself. After scolding me in private on the 11th she scolded me in public on the 12th, just before her program:

I think you are expressing the very political correctness at work in “Internet WN” that I have been complaining about lately.

At the time I considered making a further public response, but instead let it go unchallenged, in part because I had somewhere else to go and in part out of deference to the sensitivities of my former partner.

Later, in her melodrama-down, Carolyn pretended this exchange never happened and that I was “paranoid” to note the growing rift between us. She wrote:

Tan said “One of the White Nationalists she’s thinking about is me.” I had not thought about him whatsoever during the April 12 show, or ever unless I am talking specifically about him. How does he know what I’m thinking? He doesn’t, that’s the answer. But now I realize something: Tan feels his credibility as a WN is fragile because of his wife and kids. He suddenly got the idea that I was going to destroy what credibility he has … and on purpose! That has to be it. He says he doesn’t care what people think, nothing bothers him, but it’s not true. And right there is his paranoia: that I am purposely trying to hurt him. I don’t feel my credibility is fragile, that’s why I can speak the way I do.

Tan said we’ve talked about this before, so I knew that I would be upsetting him. We talked about this on Saturday evening, April 12 after I finished posting my Saturday show – the one he’s upset about. That’s the only time.

Plenty of things bother me. For example, being psychopathologized by someone who’s so blatantly either forgetting or lying about what happened. I’m bothered also by Carolyn’s arrogance, on display again here with her insisting that I don’t know what she’s thinking but she knows what I’m thinking.

One significant point about Carolyn’s program on the 12th is that she explicitly stated her intent to provoke an angry response. In one of her gossipy comments at my blog she made another unwitting admission. In this case it was that she had informed me what kind of response she was expecting:

I advised you in our hour skype conversation (rather grilling of Carolyn) to express your own feelings about it in your program.

It was when Carolyn got a different reaction than she expected, one she couldn’t just brush off like she had before, that she very suddenly exhibited a dramatic change in attitude. She developed amnesia about our prior exchanges, her trashing of White nationalism and her deliberate effort to provoke angry responses. She started playing the faultless and surprised little lamb, unfairly ambushed by big bad devious Tan. Her attempt to delete my argument and evidence to the contrary was just another volley in the game she says I was paranoid to suspect she was playing.

Though it only came to light after I had ended my partnership with her, Carolyn’s rationale for shutting down the original server and appropriating tWn’s funds strikes me as a most telling expression of her selfishness, sense of entitlement and previously latent hostility. I base this opinion especially on these statements she has made since I emancipated her from “White PC” (taken from both her blog and mine, ordered chronologically):

After he took the irresponsible and criminally unfair decision to shut me out of my own network, he now wants to make it appear that I am the bad one if I don’t continue to pay to keep it online as a memorial to his “work.” That really says it all about the devious Tanstaafl.

there is no way money to pay the server for years. And why should I be responsible for what YOU want, as you want it?

You say you “expected me to do such and such because that’s what the donations were for.” Well, I expected you to leave the site up and intact even if you didn’t want to stay there yourself. You actually promised me that, while I never told you I would pay to keep the site up after you closed me out of it and then proceeded to insult me … I had not insulted you.

The donations mostly came because of me and I’m the only one who talked about them and even asked for them and took care of the paypal account. You NEVER did since you didn’t pay for anything, but now you want to decide what they should go for. Why people don’t see through your incredible hypocrisy here I don’t know.

On the server, I knew Tan had the site backed up. So now he has some work to do to reconstruct it. Good. Let him work. And let him get himself a server … and a new domain name. There was no reason for me to continue providing for him. His paranoid conjectures that I closed the server in order to “delete the site forever” is wrong, since I understand back-ups. I don’t want to make it easy for Tan, as he has certainly made it difficult for me, in addition to playing so dirty against me. He makes himself out to be a hero here on his Blog, but any impartial observer who knew the facts would not agree.

FYI, it was I who took down the website. Since I was closed out of it, I was not going to do any favors and take care of keeping it up, with the possibility of it starting up again without me. I’m not a doormat.

I guess you could say Tan took the site down when he shut me out and declared there would be no more broadcasts, posts or comments. It became just a big archive of old stuff. Tan used his power because he could. But I had power too, so I used it – trransferring the domain name to my other server and then declaring I would not pay for TWN server anymore. He can bring most of the site back, but it won’t be the same.

I very deliberately did not take down the old tWn server out of concern to preserve the existing work and use the extant funds for the purpose they were originally solicited and provided. Carolyn’s misinterpretation of my motives as self-serving and devious is a window into her own mind. Despite her insinuations to the contrary, I considered the affect of my actions on others, including Paul Hickman. She did not.

Carolyn shut down the old server before she knew there was any viable backup. Wallowing in her own grievances, she openly gloated at the prospect that shutting down that server would harm me and diminish the existing body of work. This is no paranoid conjecture, it is a fair description of what she actually did.

Carolyn handled all tWn funds. This was part of our division of labor. I had no idea she resented the arrangement and see no cause for it. I could crow about the unique burdens I bore, some which were purely for her benefit, but it is irrelevant. Partners do different things to make a partnership work. What is relevant is that I trusted her with the money. Her mismanagement makes her look bad. My misplaced trust and misjudgment of her makes me look bad.

The most incredible hypocrisy I see is in Carolyn’s own bluster. She has in the past been inquisitive and even critical about the management of donations by people and organizations she had no direct involvement in. She can blame me for being whatever kind of scoundrel she wants – it doesn’t relieve her of her responsibility to properly manage and account for tWn’s funds.

Furthermore, it is dishonest for Carolyn to imply that tWn cost her money. From what I recall her telling me, tWn’s donors paid for everything. Their donations long ago covered her initial outlays and more than covered the ongoing expenses. When she declared, “I would not pay for TWN server anymore”, what she was declaring was that she would no longer transfer other people’s money from one tWn account to another and intended to use that money for non-tWn purposes instead. She had informed me that there were significant donations specifically earmarked for what she now dismissively refers to as my “work”. Hopefully she kept records. She should disclose whatever specifics she has.

I hope it is clear that I have tried to remain focused on the comments and disagreement between Carolyn and myself. Carolyn is much more keen to engage and complain about what other people have to say. I’ve tried to make it easy for anyone who is skeptical about the opinions and conclusions I’ve expressed here to go read or listen to the original words in their original context. I have provided copies below of what I consider the most relevant comments, just in case they should disappear from where they were originally posted.

From tWn – The End:

Tanstaafl said…

Peter, my decision had nothing to do with Frazier Glenn Miller.

It did have to do with respect. Self-respect and even more so, respect for the purpose which tWn was created and intended to serve. If a person says they can abide the 14 words, but really can’t, then it would be counter-productive to try and continue working with them.

4/15/2014 09:30:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

Meltdown for Tanstaafl

I’m not interested in her he-said-she-said personal drama, so I will keep this response brief and to the point. It may also help answer Mary and katana’s concerns.

The bottom line is that I voluntarily entered into a partnership with Carolyn to pursue this. When it became clear to me that she could not abide that I decided to divorce myself from that partnership.

I have gone one step farther by taking with me what I had brought to the partnership – the recording/broadcasting/blogging system itself. I would not have done so if I had simply changed my mind about what was important to me and decided to do something else. I deprived her of the system I built because I saw a pattern of behavior that I couldn’t abide. She herself referred to it as “going off the reservation” and “questioning” “sacred cows”. She was complaining more and more bitterly about “rah rah” and “White PC”, and openly denigrating “White nationalism”. She was not simply going beyond or outside what we had agreed our partnership was about, but counter to it, against it.

If I’m wrong, and she really does love the White race, love White nationalism, and believe in the 14 words, then wherever she goes she’ll carry that with her and demonstrate it. I don’t believe she will, because I don’t think my assessment of the divide between us is wrong. At any rate, from this point on, everyone will know that if she does something, or complains she’s not allowed to do something, that it has nothing whatsoever to do with me.

4/16/2014 10:43:00 AM

Tanstaafl said…

Her programs, and mine, will remain available where they are for as long as Carolyn decides to pay the bills for the server. I don’t know the numbers but it is my understanding that the donations more than covered tWn expenses, so even with no new funds there should be enough to cover several months or even years.

I direct concerns on this point to her. Only she can say what she will do, or how long the funds will last. I hope I’m wrong but I fear she will pull the plug as soon as she can and direct the remaining funds into her other projects.

4/16/2014 12:02:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

Well, there you have it. Carolyn is so proud of tWn and her work there that she has taken it down, or at least redirected the DNS for it.

The server is still there. The IP address is 108.175.9.251. To access the site (for the time being) you will have to edit your hosts file.

For those who object to the abruptness of what I did, or think it was due to some minor difference in attitude, here is your answer. I put tWn on permanent hold. She has taken it offline.

4/16/2014 12:16:00 PM

carolyn yeager said…

What bullshit all this is. I am anti-White; I don’t follow the 14 words. In what way is one to follow them? Do you? The “About” that you love so much says clearly, “Jews are not White.” Your wife and children are non-White. That’s why you were so content to stay in the background, but now suddenly you’ve decided to take charge.

I advised you in our hour skype conversation (rather grilling of Carolyn) to express your own feelings about it in your program. Instead you spent a half hour tearing me down in ways that were not at all accurate. While you were still fighting Arabs and embracing Jews, I had a website up in 2007 (of my own creation) with the domain name of White Women Only. Don’t preach to me about being White.

And it is true, plenty of White Nationalists are pricks. There’s no denying it.

Plus, there is no way money to pay the server for years. And why should I be responsible for what YOU want, as you want it?

4/16/2014 12:23:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

Beside making the body of tWn’s content unavailable, what Carolyn has done makes it more difficult for others to see why it is unavailable.

I have copies of everything, but it will take me some time to make them available somehow. Her podcasts and posts are available elsewhere. Mine aren’t. I had expected her to honor the tWn donors and keep the site up. My mistake, again.

. . .

4/16/2014 12:58:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

Carolyn’s response here is an example of what I faced any time I expressed any concern with what she was doing or how she was doing it. Strawmen. Insults. It’s all about what a bad person I am for disagreeing with her.

Whatever. That’s over now.

I expected her to keep tWn up because others find it valuable, and specifically because that’s what the donations were intended for. I have never expected her to do anything for me.

She is angry and lashing out at me personally because I am no longer going to be doing anything for her. She’s free now to say everything she always wanted to say about me but didn’t because she was afraid I would stop helping her. The worse she tries to make it sound the worse it reflects on her for working with me.

4/16/2014 01:23:00 PM

carolyn yeager said…

Tan says: Carolyn’s response here is an example of what I faced any time I expressed any concern with what she was doing or how she was doing it. Strawmen. Insults. It’s all about what a bad person I am for disagreeing with her.

An absolute lie. Your “concerns”, mostly from faggots trying to cover up for their friends or from someone like Rodney Martin, were always calmly answered by me. I’m at a disadvantage typing in this crummy little box provided by the crummy little FREE, no-questions-asked blogger.com.

I never insulted you and I never argued with you and I never called you names. You were the super-sensitive one about your “private life” and your “time available”, not me. You are right now being the prime example of playing the victim, not me.

You say you “expected me to do such and such because that’s what the donations were for.” Well, I expected you to leave the site up and intact even if you didn’t want to stay there yourself. You actually promised me that, while I never told you I would pay to keep the site up after you closed me out of it and then proceeded to insult me … I had not insulted you.

The donations mostly came because of me and I’m the only one who talked about them and even asked for them and took care of the paypal account. You NEVER did since you didn’t pay for anything, but now you want to decide what they should go for. Why people don’t see through your incredible hypocrisy here I don’t know. But I suppose some will eventually unless their brains are on hold. However, I do realize it’s a man thing. Most men are going to stand with other men, right or wrong.

As to Signifier, who said “CY lost sight of the purpose of the website.” And you know what the purpose of the website was, Sig? No, you don’t, only what Tan has now said it was. The real purpose of the website was to broadcast my programs. We together agreed to have a mission statement and stuff like that to look more professional, but the only thing Tan wanted to stress was some emphasis on American WN. Well, I kept that up better than he did, interviewing one WN after another, when I had hardly ever done so previously. So was Tan trying to force me into some new mold? No, because he never complained at all about my show topics. So these are all canards because it is Tanstaafl that has “changed” and lost sight of his purpose for the website. He said many times in public that his only desire was to enable me to do radio broadcasts. I was a little embarrassed by that. Then came ONE PROGRAM that struck him wrong on April 16, and he went beserk. Now you tell me who has the problem?

The crux of the matter is, I KNOW of the many conversations between us in over two years, and what they were like. But I’m more easy-going than Tan. I say what I think and don’t carry grudges, but it appears Tan has difficulty saying what he really thinks and does carry grudges. He feels he’s been suffering, oh woe.

I’m okay with what’s happened, now it’s so clear what I’m dealing with. But Tan wants to set it up so that if I’m not a passionate, devoted WN from here on in, it proves him right. Heads I win, tails you lose. Good luck to you all; I have my own pastures to graze in.

4/16/2014 02:47:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

“The real purpose of the website was to broadcast my programs.”

Exactly. That’s what YOU thought it was about. Whereas I thought, and thought you agreed, it was about what we put in the tWn About page. This was my mistake.

“if I’m not a passionate, devoted WN from here on in, it proves him right”

All you have to do to prove me wrong is actually act as if you take what was in the tWn About page seriously. You can’t, which is why I want nothing further to do with you.

If my complaints are bullshit, why have you tried to hide what they are, even though you had to take everything else offline to do so?

4/16/2014 03:27:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

A more mature response would have been to communicate to Carolyn about his serious issue with her criticism of a broad based ‘white nationalism’….(On her show, she even said that the Knights site was new to her and she was unsure of it

I did communicate with Carolyn. She brushed my concerns off. She thought tWn was all about whatever she wanted and that I had no real say. My response was to put tWn in read-only mode. This was not a careless or abrupt decision. Her WN-trashing goes back before Saturday. In that program she makes our conflict and her intent to provoke an angry reaction clear. She thought I would bite my tongue, or at worst, leave tWn to her. She miscalculated.

Her response was to reroute the DNS, making it difficult to get to. Now the server is no longer responding via its old IP, meaning it is likely gone for good. A more mature response would have been for her to use the donations to keep tWn running as an archive, because good work had been done, and others will miss it. But her programs are already archived elsewhere, and from her comment above it’s clear she feels justified using the remaining tWn donations for herself. It’s just another indication that she thought tWn was all about her.

I think I have the files necessary to provide a read-only mirror of tWn, but it will take me some time to set up. I’ll make sure it includes an explanation of Carolyn’s attempt to delete it forever.

4/17/2014 11:05:00 AM

carolyn yeagerc said…

There is serious mis-quoting going on in these comments, with no attempt by Tan to correct them even though he knows better. All these anonymous trolls, Tan! Really, where has your moderation gone? It was Tan who upbraided me in the skype conversation I reported on for “paying attention to what trolls are saying about you; why do you let them bother you?” Now here they are at AoT and Tan loves them. I’m glad my site has more dignity.

For example, it was not I who ever said “The White Network is all about me.” It was Tan who said he created it for me so I would continue doing programs; on several occasions he said it. One time was when he was on Kyle Hunt’s program. I was only pointing out what he has said, and he never said differently. Even the most ignorant and illiterate among you should be able to follow that. However, you’re all about twisting what’s been said, on purpose.

Another lie is that I brought up Tan’s family in some disparaging way. But it’s always been I who’s stood up against this criticism of Tan; Tan himself never has. What I said actually said was that Tan is going on about the “About” page like he is an Oliver Cromwell and it was Holy Scripture. So I pointed out the most important line in it, to him. It’s his mantra.

To Anonymous who said: “Yeah, the hundreds of hours spent on site setup and maintenance, as well as acting as audio engineer for every show had nothing to do with the donations.” FYI, Tan did not act as “audio engineer” for each show, he was not even around half the time. TWN was expressly designed so that wouldn’t be necessary. Plus, however many hours Tan spent, he wanted to do it, it was his choice to build it himself … these hours were matched by my hundreds, nay thousands of hours preparing for 5 hours of programs a week for two years. I also chose to do it, but there wouldn’t have been much there without me. Ignorant people like you, who probably never even listened to TWN shows, should not be loud-mouthing about what you know not.

Now to Tan’s description of our one hour skype conversation, in which I answered all his questions as patiently and as sincerely as I could. When he had nothing more to say, I told him I was quite willing to talk more if he wanted – I would be available all that night and all the next day (Sunday.) He said okay, but I never heard from him again. Now he characterizes it as: “She brushed my concerns off.” I’m sorry but I have a hard time taking his concerns about me seriously, and so do many people. I never got caught up with “concerns” about him.

Tan says a lot of things about people privately that he won’t say publicly, similar to Deanna Spingola and so many others. I brought that up. His answer was, as usual, that he doesn’t like to confront people, doesn’t want to stir up controversy. Okay. But I am willing to do that. We’re different.

On the server, I knew Tan had the site backed up. So now he has some work to do to reconstruct it. Good. Let him work. And let him get himself a server … and a new domain name. There was no reason for me to continue providing for him. His paranoid conjectures that I closed the server in order to “delete the site forever” is wrong, since I understand back-ups. I don’t want to make it easy for Tan, as he has certainly made it difficult for me, in addition to playing so dirty against me. He makes himself out to be a hero here on his Blog, but any impartial observer who knew the facts would not agree.

Please be aware that I don’t give you permission to include my programs, my program posts or my blog posts on your read-only site. I will send you a formal communication about this. Finally, I have to say that you, as a computer expert, should have done a better job of backing it up. I’m amazed at your negligence. You never expected this to happen? Well, I never expected what happened to me, either.

4/17/2014 07:19:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

Every time you make one of these bitter, vindictive comments you demonstrate that my assessment of the situation was right.

“mis-quoting” “trolls” “my site has more dignity”

You don’t have dignity. You have an echo chamber. And this isn’t it.

“There was no reason for me to continue providing for him.”

Our partnership is over. You are free to provide for someone else now.

4/17/2014 08:45:00 PM

Tanstaafl said…

I’ve been travelling and incommunicado for the past week but would like to respond to this:

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2014/04/22/rodney-martin-on-kyle-hunt/comment-page-1/#comment-2610703

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2014/04/22/rodney-martin-on-kyle-hunt/comment-page-1/#comment-2610751

Carolyn’s claim that there was no disagreement between us is part of the disagreement between us. She thought tWn was all about her. I didn’t.

“Tan agreed with me 100% on Rodney” “Tan was OK on everything I had done on TWN”

Carolyn Yeager does not speak for me. Beyond that, she’s lying. She’s gone from brushing off the concerns I expressed in private to publicly pretending that I never expressed any concerns.

I regret ever trusting or associating with her.

4/26/2014 01:33:00 AM

Here is Carolyn’s melodrama-down, Meltdown for Tanstaafl, in it’s entirety:

Written on 4-15-14 by Carolyn Yeager

UNBELIEVABLE. I never expected something like this, which came straight out of left field for me. Tan made sure I would suspect nothing. He closed me out of The White Network admin pages minutes before his taped program began. I always thought Tan was an honest straight shooter, but he is not shooting straight presently. Something happened. And it happened since April 12, just 3 days ago!! But what is not altogether new to me is Tan’s paranoia, or extremely suspicious mind. I’ve experienced quite a bit of it from him, which I can go into if necessary.

One thing Tan said to me at least a year ago, if not longer ago, in all sincerity at the time, was that if he decided to leave tWn for some reason, or if something happened to him so that he could not continue, I could continue to do my shows because it was a self-perpetuating system. It would continue to operate automatically, basically. He designed it that way. I felt pretty good about that and certainly believed he would never have any evil intentions toward me.

Well, somebody has changed in this relationship based on mutual trust and it is not me. I am saying the same things I have always said, as pertains to the White race, White Nationalism, White anything. If anyone goes through my Heretics’ Hour programs going 4 years back, available at http://carolynyeager.net under “Radio Archives,” that will be obvious. Tan was listening to my programs all the time that I was at Voice of Reason and he loved and learned from all my mainly German-oriented topics. He said so to me and to the listeners on his own shows. Now he says Carolyn Yeager doesn’t like Whites, she only likes Germans.

Here are some FACTS:

I wrote the “About” page for The White Network that he went on and on about in his “final show.” Totally. Tan said it was perfect and had no editing to suggest.

[Ironically, she was forced to paste a copy of the contents of the About page here because she had made the original page it was on inaccessible. – Tan]

I suggested he add the 14 Words to our About page. Yes, true! Tan developed the website and put things where they are. I didn’t change anything, left it to him. But the Fourteen Words were not on the About page until I told him they should be. I even suggested they be on the front page, but he ignored that and put them on the About page. Sure, he agreed with it, but had forgotten to do so.

I came up with the name The White Network. Tan liked it and wanted to use it, but it was my idea completely. The domain name belongs to me.

I suggested he put “Whites talking to Whites about White Interests” on the banner under the name, which he did. But I believe he first came up with the phrase.

I put up the money for whatever was needed. He thought that was a fair exchange (no donations yet) for his time and skill spent in making it work. But another reason was because he doesn’t want his real name associated with anything to do with TWN – not even a post office box.

I skyped Tan at least two months ago, telling him I wanted to read Hitler’s Table Talk after we finished The International Jew and asked if he had any objection. I thought he might. But he answered back, “Not at all. I think it’s a great idea.” This month he himself selected the music of Richard Wagner for the special show he does – with not a word from me!! When he asked what music I was going to use for the Table Talk, he suggested: How about Wagner? So I did select a piece from Wagner that I like very much. In fact, up until that Saturday, April 12 show he’s so upset over, there was no trouble at all between us and I have the skype record to prove it. It came up suddenly, like a tornado destroying everything in its path.

Since we started Table Talk, NOT ONCE did Tan complain to me about anything to do with it. Not once! He was very friendly to Ray Goodwin, whom he knew nothing of, on our group show April 8, just one week prior to tonight.

What Tan says about me

Tan says I don’t like White people. But Tan has only talked ABOUT white issues. I have talked TO White people, White Nationalists of every kind. I deal with people and ideas … he only deals with ideas. Why? Because it’s Tan that doesn’t like dealing with people – White People! – he’s said so enough times. And everyone who’s hosted a show at TWN knows it and has felt it! Tan has never had a guest or taken a phone call.

Tan says I don’t like Slavs. He is suddenly upset about Slavs. Just recently he said to me that he thought Northern Europeans were the only truly White people, or maybe he said the best of the White people. I don’t want to misquote him. He thinks Greeks are not White. He prefers the Nordics. He has never stood up for Slavic people that I’ve ever heard, and I’ve talked to him a lot. So he’s only using this Slav thing to add to his attack on me. Many of the things he said were for this purpose. His recall of what I said about Eurasia was totally wrong. He said I “tie White Nationalism together with this Eurasian thing” and “she attributes [Eurasianism] to White Nationalism.” How so? He goes on, “Jobbik and Russian Nationalism are actually Eurasianism so that’s another reason that WN is bad.” ??? “But she just wants to find fault with WN so she’ll even throw in things that WN isn’t.” Really, when did I say all this? Tan is hearing what he wants to hear in order to make his case.

Tan said “One of the White Nationalists she’s thinking about is me.” I had not thought about him whatsoever during the April 12 show, or ever unless I am talking specifically about him. How does he know what I’m thinking? He doesn’t, that’s the answer. But now I realize something: Tan feels his credibility as a WN is fragile because of his wife and kids. He suddenly got the idea that I was going to destroy what credibility he has … and on purpose! That has to be it. He says he doesn’t care what people think, nothing bothers him, but it’s not true. And right there is his paranoia: that I am purposely trying to hurt him. I don’t feel my credibility is fragile, that’s why I can speak the way I do.

Tan said we’ve talked about this before, so I knew that I would be upsetting him. We talked about this on Saturday evening, April 12 after I finished posting my Saturday show – the one he’s upset about. That’s the only time. He took up at least an hour of my time accusing me of anti-White behavior and insisting he only wanted to understand why I was doing what I was doing – “trashing White people.” Previously, he had come on my comments section and attacked me there … then was offended that I didn’t like it. I sent this skype message to him on Friday at 5:57 pm:

[4/11/2014 5:57:26 PM] Carolyn Yeager: What I had in mind for Monday the 14th has fallen through. Would you like to come on with Kevin MacDonald? If so, what would you want the overall topic to be. If you say yes and give a topic, I’ll invite him [kmac]. …no answer …

[4/11/2014 6:56:45 PM] Carolyn Yeager: You know, Tan, I am not too happy about being grilled by you on my own program comments. It really seems you could speak to me privately before you go on the attack in public. … no answer …

[4/11/2014 7:02:37 PM] Carolyn Yeager: It always has connotations of being out of line as a woman. A woman can’t criticize men. But you let Franklin R. participate all these years [on your blog, I meant] without doing anything about it, and the first time I had an interaction with him, I outed him. Then you accuse me of committing some great sin of including him as a WN , as though being a Jew he can’t be that. We don’t know for a fact he is a Jew anyway. Why don’t you get some proof. … no answer ….

Next day …

[4/12/2014 3:21:33 PM] Tan Staafl: i dont understand why you let trolls get to you, or why you take the role theyre playing at face value, or why you turn that into a criticism of Whites or White men

[4/12/2014 3:24:34 PM] Tan Staafl: i dont think FR is a jew, i think its more complicated than that. even though he didnt identify himself as a WN you immediately directed your anger at him into yet another excuse to trash WN – im trying to understand what you’re criticizing, not attacking you

[4/12/2014 3:25:16 PM] Tan Staafl: i cant make monday

[4/12/2014 3:25:36 PM] Carolyn Yeager: Wrong, FR always presents himself as a WN and he did with me.

[4/12/2014 3:26:59 PM] Carolyn Yeager: He’s all over the Internet as a White Nationalist! Think about when you’d like to do something with KMac and the subject matter.

[4/12/2014 5:48:39 PM] Tan Staafl: got time to talk?

Tan was planning out his moves already. Supposedly giving me a chance to explain myself. I didn’t satisfy him, that is clear.

Tan says in his short blog that he thanks Hadding Scott and Ray Goodwin for their contribution to TWN, in that way putting himself in a position of having something to do with them. They are both friends of mine who I had as guests on previous programs, whom I invited to co-host a “Study Hour” of my own creation, something that Tan refused to participate in. He himself never brought a single person to TWN. He doesn’t like to be bothered with people, as I told you.

Finally, he puts the responsibility for the future availability of TWN archives solely onto ME, after he shut the whole place down!! … saying “what happens is Carolyn Yeager’s decision and responsibility.”

After he took the irresponsible and criminally unfair decision to shut me out of my own network, he now wants to make it appear that I am the bad one if I don’t continue to pay to keep it online as a memorial to his “work.” That really says it all about the devious Tanstaafl.

I could respond to more but I’ve done enough. Very sad day. I called it on Monday with the 4-14-14 numbers representing change, but didn’t know it would be so brutal. But there’s also a meaning of freedom involved in there too, and I do feel rather liberated today. I lived up to my end of the partnership in every way, but Tan’s behavior cannot be considered Aryan.

Carolyn attached the following comments to this melodrama-down.

carolyn Thu, 17/04/14

Hi katana

. . . I can assure you, I am not wrong and I did nothing wrong. It’s a farce to even consider it.

carolyn Fri, 18/04/14

Actually …

. . .

Let me note briefly here, so I won’t forget to discuss it later, that Tanstaafl shut down TWN at a time it was showing an Alexa global ranking at 200,000 even — the best it had ever been. We were headed toward the 100,000 level, which is fantastic. This was a fews days before his momentous decision on his Tuesday, April 15 program. Why would he do such a thing – stop the momentum of TWN (he didn’t know at that time that Paul Hickman had left) – for some purist idea he developed about not allowing any critical thinking about “White Nationalism?”

Carolyn has always been more concerned about popularity (and Alexa ratings) than me.

I spent most of the 12th, 13th and 14th digesting what Carolyn had said and done, considering what my response would be. It wasn’t until after she told me that Paul had already decided to leave (on the 14th) that I finally settled on doing what I did, which took most of the 15th for me to record and write up.

carolyn Fri, 18/04/14

Hi Steven

. . .

FYI, it was I who took down the website. Since I was closed out of it, I was not going to do any favors and take care of keeping it up, with the possibility of it starting up again without me. I’m not a doormat.

carolyn Fri, 18/04/14

A little more on this

Steve, I guess you could say Tan took the site down when he shut me out and declared there would be no more broadcasts, posts or comments. It became just a big archive of old stuff. Tan used his power because he could. But I had power too, so I used it – trransferring the domain name to my other server and then declaring I would not pay for TWN server anymore. He can bring most of the site back, but it won’t be the same.

carolyn Fri, 18/04/14

Bizarre and not

Bizarre and not understandable to me also, But little by little I am seeing a clearer picture. I know in time it will be explained.

carolyn Fri, 18/04/14

One more thing …

WWWM – it came right before our 2 year anniversary in May. We even had plans for it! Is this some attempt to inflict as much pain as possible?

carolyn Sat, 19/04/14

Thanks Alexander and Mary

. . .

Tan’s thinking is starting to come clear to me. I think it is very simple. Tan thought I was criticizing “White Nationalism” too much and obviously didn’t think that I would stop, and it could get worse (though this last part he didn’t say to me). When I said I didn’t even want to talk about White Nationalism anymore, he didn’t like that either. Since he considered the skype interface software he had made to be his own property, rather than shared property of both of us as partners, he felt justified in simply making it unavailable to me. Cold, calculated and not wanting me to have a clue as to what he was going to do.

The finality of the language he used on his program and in his short blog told me he would not accept any mediation or have any change of mind. He even cut off the personal skype connection between us at the same time, designating there was nothing to talk about.

Those who think he was bothered by my outspoken views are wrong. He agreed with most of them. It was this White Nationalism thing with him.

carolyn Sat, 19/04/14

Glenn Miller

“I cant help but think that all of this has something to do with the Glenn Miller thing, even if it is unconscious.”

Maybe.

. . . [Carolyn quotes and comments here on something somebody else wrote at some other site – Tan]

If they come after me, I’ll tell them Tanstaafl has said I am not a White Nationalist! Go ask him, he’ll vouch for me.

carolyn Mon, 21/04/14

Thanks Margaret

. . .

When someone needs to defend and spin their personal version of their motives for doing a dirty deed, honor goes out the window. We see it all the time.

Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s spinning dirt most desperately of all?

carolyn Mon, 21/04/14

great observation

I had exactly the same thought a couple days ago. It’s like Tan is someone who is so sensitive to treason, he commits it himself! Thanks for this.

UPDATE 30 April 2014: Let the record show that Carolyn Yeager continues to try to utterly remove tWn from the internet.

From: Carolyn (warwo14@yahoo.com) This sender is in your contact list.

Sent: Tue 4/29/14 9:34 PM

To: ageoftreason@hotmail.com (ageoftreason@hotmail.com)

Tanstaafl,

As I said to you on April 17 on your Age of Treason blog site, you do not have my permission to reproduce my work on your fake “white network” archive site.

Please be aware that I don’t give you permission to include my programs, my program posts or my blog posts on your read-only site. I will send you a formal communication about this.
4/17/2014 07:19:00 PM

As the registered owner of thewhitenetwork.com domain, I, Carolyn Yeager, can tell you that you do not represent The White Network, nor do you have any of the property rights of The White Network pertaining to radio mp3’s or writings produced for The White Network.

Having ownership of your own mp3’s and writings, you are free to reproduce them on a website with a domain name different than “thewhitenetwork.com”. Others who have produced work at thewhitenetwork.com can give you permission to reproduce their own work. But I, Carolyn Yeager, do not give you that permission to use my intellectual property for your own purposes.

I request that you take down the site, remove all intellectual property produced by me, get a new domain name (perhaps Age of Treason Radio.com) and then put up your new site. If I don’t receive a reply to his email from you within the next 36 hours, I will send a complaint to 1and1.com.

Yours truly,

Carolyn Yeager

UPDATE 30 April 2014 #2: My response to Carolyn Yeager.

From: Tan Staafl (ageoftreason@hotmail.com)

Sent: Wed 4/30/14 11:43 PM

To: Carolyn Yeager (warwo14@yahoo.com)

Carolyn Yeager,

In a gesture of good will and in an effort to comply with the spirit of your request (via email 29 April 2014), on my site “thewhitenetwork-archive.com” I have redacted the contents of pages authored by you and have removed the MP3 files for programs you hosted (hereafter, “TWN-MP3s”). This action does not mean that I accept or agree with any of your ownership claims concerning the White network (hereafter, “tWn”).

You are hereby notified that tWn was a product of my software and, as such, is my work product. This includes all files, audio or otherwise, including but not limitted to TWN-MP3s and tWn logos. Furthermore, I reserve the right to restrict the use of all TWN-MP3s containing my likeness, specifically my voice. If you make further claims upon my time I will seek to restrict your use of TWN-MP3s and any other part of my work product, at “carolynyeager.net” or anywhere else.

You are the registered owner of the domain name “thewhitenetwork.com”, which has been paid for using donations to support tWn, my work product. You have no authority to dictate who does or does not “represent The White Network” or to determine “any of the property rights of The White Network”.

Though I do not require your permission to use my work product, the full context of your 4/17/2014 07:19:00 PM comment (at http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2014/04/twn-end.html) makes it clear that you gave your consent to my reconstructing tWn under a different domain name:

“On the server, I knew Tan had the site backed up. So now he has some work to do to reconstruct it. Good. Let him work. And let him get himself a server … and a new domain name. There was no reason for me to continue providing for him. His paranoid conjectures that I closed the server in order to “delete the site forever” is wrong, since I understand back-ups. I don’t want to make it easy for Tan, as he has certainly made it difficult for me, in addition to playing so dirty against me. He makes himself out to be a hero here on his Blog, but any impartial observer who knew the facts would not agree.”

Sincerely,

Tanstaafl

UPDATE 1 May 2014: Some posts in calendar-based archive pages with a mixture of authors were improperly redacted. This unintentional oversight has now been fixed.

UPDATE 20 May 2014: More demands from Carolyn.

From: Carolyn (warwo14@yahoo.com) This sender is in your contact list.

Sent: Mon 5/19/14 6:55 PM

To: ageoftreason@hotmail.com (ageoftreason@hotmail.com); warwo14@yahoo.com (warwo14@yahoo.com)

To Tanstaafl:

I noticed today that you have uploaded some of my The Heretics’ Hour radio programs to your new Age of Treason blogsite. Not only are my show mp3s available on your website, but the programs posts I wrote and the images I selected are there as well. According to The White Network policy you agreed to and which was posted on TWN front page for a long time, this content is my property.

Policy

The content presented at this web site thewhitenetwork.com is the sole property of the program host and/or writer and The White Network. All rights reserved.

Since The White Network is dissolved and belongs to no one, these programs belong solely to me, the program host. I demand you remove all my intellectual property from your website immediately.

Yours truly,

Carolyn Yeager

I will not heed or make any direct response to this egomaniac’s demands, but I will take the opportunity, since I’m here to update this record anyway, to add a few relevant notes.

I have not uploaded any Heretics’ Hour radio programs to Age of Treason. Carolyn is probably referring to links in a few older blog posts which originally pointed to thewhitenetwork.com, which she broke when she redirected the DNS for that domain to carolynyeager.net and then shut down the server. One of the benefits of moving my blog from Blogger to a new dedicated server was that it was easy for me to change all those broken thewhitenetwork.com links to point at thewhitenetwork-archive.com instead.

thewhitenetwork-archive.com doesn’t serve the radio program files she’s complaining about either – I fixed it to simply redirect all such links to the files on her own site. Here are the web server directives I use:


RedirectMatch ^/data/audio/tWn_The_Heretics_Hour_20130520.mp3 /tWn_The_Heretics_Hour_20130520.mp3
RedirectMatch ^/data/audio/(tWn_The_Heretics_Hour_.*) http://carolynyeager.net/system/files/$1
RedirectMatch ^/data/audio/(tWn_Hitlers_Table_Talk_Study_Hour_.*) http://carolynyeager.net/system/files/$1
RedirectMatch ^/data/audio/(tWn_Saturday_Afternoon_with_Carolyn_Yeager_.*) http://carolynyeager.net/system/files/$1
RedirectMatch ^/data/audio/(tWn_The_International_Jew_Study_Hour_.*) http://carolynyeager.net/system/files/$1


The one exception (/tWn_The_Heretics_Hour_20130520.mp3) is the file for a program that was hosted by Hadding Scott, who contacted me via email to request that I make it available, ironically because Carolyn does not host it on her own site.

As easy as it was for me to fix my broken links, it would be even easier for Carolyn Yeager to fix all the links she broke, everywhere on the internet at once. All she has to do is change the DNS for thewhitenetwork.com to point at thewhitenetwork-archive.com. But of course, the whole point of her breaking the links in the first place was to cause harm – to make it difficult for anyone to get to any of tWn’s content, including the portions which she had no hand in producing.

I reject Carolyn’s assertion that, “The White Network is dissolved and belongs to no one”, but note the contrast with the assertions she made in her previous email. Her increasingly lame rationale for making demands convinces me that I made the right decision to end our partnership. I have never disavowed my interest in the White network and have no intention to ever do so. I am gratified however that Carolyn continues to demonstrate that she was interested in tWn only to the extent she thought it served her personally. That is, after all, exactly why I ended the partnership.

Speaking of what belongs to who, I’ll call here once again for Carolyn to make a full accounting for the tWn funds she managed.

I’ve registered an account at Metapedia and explained why there. See also: The White Network, Talk:The_White_Network, and User_talk:Tanstaafl.

UPDATE 28 June 2014: I figured out how to alter the redaction code so that a post’s podcast player and download links (if present) will be visible. The MP3 links still redirect to carolynyeager.net, which serves all the data, but this way if someone ends up at a whitenetwork-archive.com page it will be less broken for them.

UPDATE 25 Aug 2015: I reject Carolyn Yeager’s “Offer”.

UPDATE 9 Sep 2015: More egomanaical whining from Carolyn:

It is a time-consuming labor, but worth the effort to me. I want those who wrote comments to my shows to have them visible where people will actually see them. I will begin next on The Heretics’ Hour, and end with The International Jew Study Hour. I’ll just point out here that I produced 278 radio shows totaling 463 hours for The White Network. That contrasts to Tanstaafl’s 97 radio shows totaling only 48.5 hours, meaning I did 10 times the program hours that he did! So what gave him the idea it belonged to him and he could shut it down?

Some of you might know that I tried to cooperate with Tanstaafl on making his TWN-archive complete, but he rudely refused my offer. Thereupon, I blocked his access to my audio programs and am in the process of making carolynyeager.net complete instead !

I’ll just point out here that she only has to do this comment-copying because she refused the offer I made, which was to freeze the site I had built and maintained but leave it online. Instead she chose to delete it, forever as far as she was concerned. Now she’s “stealing” from the archive she was hoping I couldn’t reconstruct and has since tried to delete. Anyone who only listens to her would never know this. They also wouldn’t know that in her rush to shut off the original server she deleted not only my reason for locking her out but all the programs that she had nothing at all to do with producing, which unlike “her” programs had no other home on the internet. Even now she places no value whatsoever on any of this other work.

I not only spent hours of my life writing the software she used to record “her” tWn programs, I was also physically present, monitoring the recording of almost every single hour she takes all the credit for producing. On several occasions there were software/connection problems and I spent more hours of my life skyping her and her guests and editing “her” audio files. She never helped me or anyone else in any comparable fashion, and of course she places no value on any of this work either.

Carolyn has always focused on quantity. My preference has always been for quality. She told me once that she liked to have guests because that made it much easier for her. At the time (and perhaps even still) I was her most frequent guest – 3 times at VoR and 13 on tWn – maybe 20-25 hours total. I never counted how many hours I put into my own program, on-air, but I take her word for it that it was only about twice what I spent being a guest on “her” program.

I understand that in her mind the entire network was all about her – but that’s just not the reality. In comparing raw on-air hours as she does she’s not only neglecting the hours I spent, but also takes ALL the credit for the hours every other host and guest and collaborator spent working on “her” content.

This is my experience with Carolyn Yeager. Maybe others will learn something from it. I know I did.

In taking deliberate action to block access to redirects from the archive site Carolyn has made it plain that the podcasts she has so long either stupidly or mendaciously insisted I’m “stealing” were merely links redirected to files on her own site, just as I explained long ago. I am not surprised that she provides no acknowledgement of her error.

Her purpose is vindictive. Her true desire is to interfere with the proper functioning of the archive site in whatever way she is able. It took extra effort for me to add the redirects only because she disapproved of this server hosting the mp3 files directly. Now it has taken her and some unfortunate minion extra effort to ensure the redirects don’t work. And now that she’s invalidated her own “copyright infringement” pretext I fully expect her to simply dream up another.

UPDATE 22 Jul 2016: Paul Hickman’s content has been redacted at his request.

UPDATE 6 Nov 2017: Paul Hickman has died. I have unredacted Paul content, at my own discretion, in the interest of making his able work at tWn accessible once again to his friends and compatriots. Paul had originally requested via email that I take his work offline out of concern for his employment. This is obviously no longer a concern.

UPDATE 24 Jan 2019: The previous change only restored the text of Paul’s posts, not the mp3 links. That oversight has been fixed and the mp3 links work now.

For the reasons described in My Mistake, I have decided, without consulting with or seeking Carolyn Yeager’s consent, that The White Network will no longer be used to record or broadcast any new programs. There will be no further posts or comments. I will not allow her to abuse the system I constructed to undermine the purpose for which it was constructed and for which she originally agreed to use it.

I expect Carolyn Yeager will continue publishing at carolynyeager.net. I will continue at Age of Treason. I have not decided what to do with AoTR. Carolyn informed me yesterday that Paul Hickman had already decided to move to Renegade Broadcasting. I wish him good luck. His decision has made my decision about tWn much easier. I thank Ray Goodwin and Hadding Scott for their contributions here.

Though I have always managed the server itself, Carolyn has always managed the donations and bills and thus has control over the hosting account and domain name. I would like this site to stand as an archive for as long as possible, so I request that she use whatever funds remain, or new funds come in, to continue paying the bills. Whether this actually happens is Carolyn Yeager’s decision and responsibility.

This month’s special program was transcoded from The Best of Wagner. It will be broadcast each Wednesday and Friday starting at 9PM ET, streaming continuously until the next scheduled program.

The Mastersingers of Nuremberg, I: "Overture"
The Mastersingers of Nuremberg, Act III: "Prelude" ( 10:44 )
The Mastersingers of Nuremberg, Act III: "Dance of the Apprentices" ( 16:37 )
Lohengrin, WWV 75, I: "Prelude" ( 19:00 )
Lohengrin, III: "Prelude" ( 27:57 )
The Valkyrie, WWV 86B, III: "The Ride of the Valkyries" ( 30:21 )
The Valkyrie, III: "Magic Fire Music" ( 36:20 )
Parsifal, WWV 111: "Overture" ( 39:52 )
Parsifal, III: "Good Friday Spell" ( 42:02 )
Rienzi, the Last of the Tribunes, WWV 49, I: "Overture" ( 46:00 )
Tannhäuser, WWV 70, I: "Overture" ( 51:17 )
The Flying Dutchman, WWV 63, I: "Overture" ( 1:06:22 )
Tristan and Isolde, WWV 90, I: "Prelude" ( 1:16:53 )

Quite imperceptibly the “Creditor of Kings” has become the King of Creeds, and we really cannot take this monarch’s pleading for emancipation as otherwise than uncommonly naïve, seeing that it is much rather we who are shifted into the necessity of fighting for emancipation from the Jews. According to the present constitution of this world, the Jew in truth is already more than emancipate: he rules, and will rule, so long as Money remains the power before which all our doings and our dealings lose their force.

– Richard Wagner, Judaism in Music, 1850

Total runtime: 1:27:38

This month’s special program is a reading of the momentous speech delivered by Enoch Powell at the Midland Hotel in Birmingham on 20 April 1968. It will be broadcast each Wednesday and Friday starting at 9PM ET, streaming continuously until the next scheduled program.

Though is has been described as “the most controversial speech in modern British history”, there is apparently no complete recording available on the internet. A BBC documentary (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), produced circa 2008, starts with a reporter, Reg Harcourt, describing how he was there with a camera team. The BBC documentary intersperses snippets of the black and white film of the speech with “anti-racist” spin attempting to explain that Powell was wrong.

Powell’s speech serves as a reminder and lesson to Whites: However bad you may believe the situation is, or may yet become, you are likely underestimating. Looking back, we find many sober expressions of fear and foreboding such as Powell’s. Always they are countered with the same fraud and trickery. What our enemies initially deride and dismiss as a stupid, crazy, or evil vision invariably metastasizes into an even more disgustingly degenerate reality, which they then celebrate.

Our program was transcoded from “Rivers of Blood” The Great Betrayal. Full speech., read and posted by Martin Willett. The description attached to the video reads:

Published on Oct 14, 2011

The 1968 speech given by Enoch Powell known as The Rivers of Blood speech. In full. No editing, cuts, omissions, spin, commentary, propaganda or tricky sound effects. Just the speech.

These are words written in 1968, and not by me. Don’t shoot the messenger, just listen to the message and judge for yourself.

The FULL TEXT of this speech can be found here:

http://right2think.org/index.php/politics-main/68-rivers-of-blood-speech

If you want to debate this matter in depth join my debate forum:

http://right2think.org/index.php/forum/

Total runtime: 20:09

Hosted by Carolyn Yeager and Ray Goodwin, shown above photographed together at the home of James Damon in Texas in 2010.

The program will consist of reading and commentary of the text. TWN is well aware the book is controversial and those issues will be dealt with during the program episodes. The first program, on March 6, will be an introductory one. The edition being used was translated from the German by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, published by Enigma Books, New York, and can be found as a pdf here.

Hitler’s Table Talk Study Hour will broadcast every Thursday evening at 8 pm Eastern time (5 pm Pacific), beginning this Thursday, March 6, 2014.  See you then.

The real Rodney Martin - taken in 2012 and published on his own website, not photo-shopped. Don't blame me.

Here is the story, as best I can put it together from the record of the Porterville Recorder, of Rodney Martin’s career with the Tule River Indian Tribe and their attempts to have an off-reservation Card Room. I am sorry it has to be so long, but it necessarily has to come from the newspaper reports since I know nothing first hand, of my own accord. I was not there.

Rodney Martin continues to say that he was working with the Tule River Indian Tribe on a consultant basis and was involved in helping work out an Airport Authority agreement between the city of Porterville, Ca and the reservation. Yet in the Porterville Recorder newspaper articles since 2007, Martin comes up mostly in connection with the “card room” project – a gambling venue associated with the Tribe’s on-reservations casino “Eagle Mountain.”

It appears that Martin was always employed in some form of government service, and from there went directly into full-time employment by the Tule River Indians as their administrator in August 2006. That employment appears to have ended sometime around the fall of 2008, if not summer … so he was employed for about two years.

Nowhere in the Porterville Recorder‘s 100 archived articles/letters by or about Rodney Martin is it ever stated that he is an independent contractor or consultant. It’s certainly possible he set up a consulting business, just like he sets up associations, “foundations,” and networks which are not serious contenders as money-making entities.

In the following articles from the Recorder of Nov. 2007 to Feb. 2010, we find some interesting clues as to why Martin was so enthusiastic about his position as Administrator for the Tule River Tribe. I’ll start with an article from Nov. 24, 2007. RM had been on the job for over a year and things were well underway.

The boldface throughout  is mine, along with my comments in blue.

http://www.recorderonline.com/card-room-license-sale-challenged/article_4b3b7671-e9e0-57a3-870e-189f23a9d737.html

Card room license sale challenged

Posted: Saturday, November 24, 2007 12:00 am | Updated: 8:19 am, Thu Nov 14, 2013.

BY SARAH ELIZABETH VILLICANA

A resident and member of the Porterville Parks and Leisure Commission is accusing a city councilman of bad business.

“For the sale of this license the city councilman received compensation for his part negotiating this contract,” Shelton said.

Earlier this week Shelton presented the City Council with copies of an unsigned sales contract between James L. Podergois, an owner of The Mint bar and card room and the Tule River Tribe.

The contract spells out the details of the sale of a card room license for the sum of $800,0000 payable to Podergois in two installments. The payments are dated for period ending Jan. 1, 2007.

On Friday Podergois said the transfer of the license has been completed. He did not wish to comment further. The documents were copies of a fax dated Jan. 3, 2007 according to an attached New York Life Co. cover sheet from Martinez’s office.

“As I did some research I learned that the city councilman continued to vote on items concerning the main parties involved in a deal he made money off of,” Shelton said.

Martinez on Monday confirmed he acted as broker for the sale and received payment for his services at the beginning of this calendar year. He also responded to allegations of unethical voting practices.

“I’ve excused myself from voting on anything that could have been perceived as a conflict of interest,” Martinez said. “I have done nothing wrong.”

Martinez said he believes the contract is being used in an attempt to tarnish his reputation. He said he has spoken with the city attorney, who he said confirmed he had not violated any rules or regulation. Should a city councilman be making money off of “brokering deals” that he is asked to do only because he is a city councilman? While he may not have broken any rules, it is not ethical.

The contract papers themselves are at issue because the originals are part of file reported stolen from the tribal office. Turns out it was not stolen.

Tribal police official Lt. Thomas Ludwig is conducting a federal investigation into the missing papers and any suspects who may have been involved in the theft. Details relating to the nature of any additional documents that were taken has not been released.

Included in the documents presented by Shelton was a copy of selected minutes from past Council actions involving the tribe and the Brickhouse. The Brickhouse is a new restaurant and bar owned by a group of investors which includes Podergois.

According to the records provided by Shelton, Martinez abstained from voting on at least two items concerning the Brickhouse, citing a conflict of interest.

Items involving the tribe that Martinez did vote on included:

a resolution of support for cross deputization of the tribe’s police force,

a grant application for the tribe to receive continued funding for police and fire staff,

a city ordinance concerning card room regulations and

council direction to staff to communicate with the Tribal Council to acquire surplus lighting equipment.

City Manager John Longley said he is not aware of Martinez having any conflicts of interest on city matters in which he has cast a vote.

Shelton also claimed Martinez tried to mask his part in the sale of the license by being paid through a third party.

Tule Tribe Administrator Rodney Martin was at Tuesday’s Council meeting for an unrelated matter. He addressed the Board in response to the claims, essentially calling them baseless.

“The facts have been investigated prior to  any statements made by the person who spoke just prior,” Martin told council members. “I would hope that you keep that in mind prior to any action and that you wouldn’t rush to the lowest common denominator.” What Rodney Martin calls “facts” when he is in battle-mode  are not recognized as such by most people.

On Wednesday Martin said he is planning to make all the details of the card room sale available in an effort to put to rest any rumors of dishonest conduct. […]~~

Three days later …

http://www.recorderonline.com/background-released-on-license-sale/article_ca0b4806-5ac8-58dd-

Background released on license sale

Posted: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:00 am | Updated: 8:15 am, Thu Nov 14, 2013.

By SARAH ELIZABETH VILLICANA

As tribal officials released details on the controversial purchase of a card room license, the focus shifts to new allegations against a Porterville businesswoman. We will find that this is Mary McLure and the allegations come from Rodney Martin. This is the tactic of  “Answer legitimate questions with attack”  that Martin favors.

“The owner of this property took it upon themselves to inject themselves [sic] into the tribe’s card room process, even contacting state gaming officials and local officials,” Martin said. “Probably all of these innuendos and rumors emerging would not be taking place today if someone had not injected themselves from outside the regular process.”

Martin did not name the property owner and referred to them only as “the individual.” Martin had the same style in 2007 as he has today!! As I’ve said before, his hallmark is pointing to people and implicating them in unsavory things without himself ever naming them.

After rejecting the proposal, Martin said, the individual allegedly made threats against both tribal officials and their family members, urging officials to change the direction of the project. Martin today likes to tell us how even his wife has been harassed and threatened.

After a file was reportedly stolen containing a draft of the sales contract for a card room license, Martin alleges the individual who submitted the proposal passed the draft contract to at least two people to create suspicion in response to the tribe rejecting the initial offer. Martin is accusing an unnamed individual of being complicit in a crime.

Included in the documents released by Martin was a redacted copy of the $1.9 million proposal submitted to the Tribal Council.

The property, located in the county, is described as having a large room, its own bar and large outside patio with a second room and bar separated by a large kitchen. A $1.9 million price tag includes the 10,000–square–foot building with karaoke equipment, pool tables and arcade games.

Mary McClure, owner of Charlie’s Pizza Kitchen, confirmed Monday that she submitted a proposal to the tribe for the sale of Charlie’s. She said it was the tribe who initiated talks.

“They contacted me and looked at the place,” McClure said Monday evening. “They wanted to put a card room out there.” Mary McClure may be too honest in her business dealings for Rodney’s comfort.

[…]

Martin on Monday clarified in his statement that no Porterville city councilman has ever acted as the tribe’s agent or broker on the tribe’s card room project nor has the tribe paid any brokerage fee or commission for the acquisition of the license.

Martinez declined to reveal who did pay his commission but said Martin’s statement was accurate.

McClure said she believes Martin is revealing more information about the sale of the license to distract from what she considers to be the real issue. Does Martin use distraction techniques? Absolutely yes.

“Rodney is trying to blow things out of proportion,” McClure said. “This has nothing to do with a card room license. It’s all about payola. It’s about Felipe Martinez taking money for a sale and voting on stuff.”

McClure said she has been contacted twice by a tribal police officer. When asked if she circulated copies of the draft, she said she had the right to know about Martinez’s commission.

“It’s my business if a councilman took $10,000 in payola,” McClure said. “That’s not Indian business. That’s our business down here in Porterville. Don’t accuse me of anything because I haven’t done nothing wrong.”

Martin said the investigation into the theft of tribal documents is ongoing and will be referred to the FBI and Office of the U.S. Attorney at the appropriate time. He said tribal officials who were allegedly subjected to extortion and threats plan to take separate civil and criminal actions.~~

The following week two city council meetings occurred on subsequent days. The first, on Dec. 4^th, featured an admission and apology from Felipe Martinez and further information from Mary McClure.

http://www.recorderonline.com/face-off-at-city-hall/article_d6bbc47c-836e-5d94-b90d-462d25b3a61c.html

Face-off at city hall

Posted: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 12:00 am | Updated: 8:19 am, Thu Nov 14, 2013.

By SARAH ELIZABETH VILLICANA

A City Council member [has] once again defended himself against allegations of misconduct.

Martinez revealed he was paid by David Gonzales, a business associate of James Podergois and part owner of the Brickhouse restaurant and bar, for services he provided in connection with the card room license sale.

“Since I did not receive any compensation from the tribe, I voted on issues regarding the tribe,” Martinez said.

He said he abstained from voting on items involving the party who did in fact pay him.

“Having said this, and prior to the Nov. 20 City Council meeting, I requested the city attorney ask the FPPC [California Fair Political Practices Commission] to provide written advice concerning future agenda items of all parties involved,” Martinez said. “The FPPC is an impartial and unemotional entity and whatever ruling they hand down, I will gladly accept.”

Martinez went on to apologize to the community, city staff and to his colleagues for the apparent unease resulting from this “situation.”

McClure, who also read from a prepared statement, responded to allegations [Rodney’s] that she had attempted to interject herself into the tribe’s negotiations for a card room site. She stated representatives of the tribe, at one time, came to her seeking a building that could accommocate 50 card tables.

McClure, who owns Charlie’s Pizza Kitchen, accused Tribal Administrator Rodney Martin of blocking her from speaking to the Tribal Council and trying to take business away from her pizza kitchen. As for the copies of documents she is in possession of — which were allegedly stolen from tribal offices — McClure said they were left for her.

Along with McClure’s statement to the council on Tuesday, she presented a previously uncirculated document that appears to be a project update from Martin to the Tribal Council.

The memo describes a deal where the tribe would receive the completed part of the Sea Food Cafe in exchange for a loan to the owners of the restaurant that would go toward developing the remaining portion of the building.

Martin said the information on the document, dated Oct. 5, is inaccurate and that the tribe plans to rent a 400-square-foot space inside the building — and presented a memo to the city stating so, dated Dec. 2. Martin misleadingly uses the word “inaccurate” for something he did write at one time, but since has written something else.

An agenda item relating to the future card room was continued until January. […]~~

The next article appears the following day; we see Rodney Martin fighting to keep his little empire going. The dismissive, arrogant style he assumes is the same as he exhibits now to me, Carolyn Yeager, as I bring attention to details he doesn’t want anyone to pay attention to.

http://www.recorderonline.com/another-round-of-play-in-card-room-license-dispute/article_f01e4084-9557-54c8-93c8-f7c42818702b.html

Another round of play in card room license dispute

Posted: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 12:00 am | Updated: 8:11 am, Thu Nov 14, 2013.

By SARAH ELIZABETH VILLICANA

Tule River Tribe Administrator Rodney Martin is striking back against the most recent onslaught of allegations surrounding the purchase of a card room license.

Once the card room is in operation, according to Martin, all proceeds will go to benefit the future Tule River elementary school, serving grades kindergarten through third. The school, located at the former Porterville Adult School site, currently operates as an after-school study center. And all kinds of money will be lavished on this school, right? Nothing too good for the little kiddies. A perfect opportunity for channeling money to politicians and administrators.

Recall that the Porterville Adult School Superintendent was Bob Perez.  See http://www.recorderonline.com/tribe-purchases-school/article_57334127-484a-5886-8954-324393be1e2f.html Tribe purchases school …  Naysayers or not, Porterville Adult School director Bob Perez, who was not in attendance at the meeting, believes the purchase and the move toward a new school is a good one for many reasons. “I’m just so excited about this,” Perez said last week. “From my vantage point, I’ve said this is a good move and these are the reasons why:  It establishes the reservation’s presence in the Porterville community and they won’t be isolated, the area is centrally located in Porterville, and they can better serve the student population at Porterville High because of the existing after-school program.”

“This has never been done before,” Martin said of a tribe operating a Class 2 card room license. “There’s no precedent. Once this is all done and the precedent has been set I think you are going to see a lot of tribes purchasing card room licenses.”

Martin responded today to claims made by Mary McClure during the public comment portion of Tuesday’s City Council meeting.

In response to McClure’s description of a meeting between herself and the tribe’s financial director, David Liu, in mid-October, Martin said the incident never took place. Flat out saying Mary is crazy or a liar. Except that she successfully runs a business, while Martin has always worked for government. Which is the best place for thieves of public monies?

“No member of the tribe’s staff initiated discussions or negotiations with Charlie’s Pizza Kitchen,” Martin said. “It’s completely false.”

McClure responded to Martin’s statement, saying tribal staff members have spoken with her about using the large room at Charlie’s for a card room that would accommodate 50 tables — an assertion Martin said is not only untrue but impractical.

“We purchased a license for three card tables,” Martin said. “She made a representation she could work to secure the 50 tables. If you look at the demographics, this area couldn’t sustain 50 tables.”

Martin wouldn’t know about negotiations over Charlie’s, McClure said, because he was never present.

“He must not have talked to anyone,” McClure said. “He’s trying to save face. I don’t lie and he’s still out to lunch.”

Martin said in recent months the tribe has rejected offers for the sale of properties owned by McClure.

“I guarantee you if we had accepted one of her unsolicited proposals, none of this would be happening right now,” he said.~~ This type of response, that intends to close off further debate by claiming the other person is motivated out of some kind of revenge, is the same as what he uses with me. Rodney’s game is to discredit what Mary is saying by discrediting her motives, by accusing her of simple “sour grapes” for losing out on the card room. We don’t know if she even wanted it, or was just relating what happened.

We also see here Rodney’s penchant for “taking charge” and insisting on being the only spokesperson for the tribe.

In February, Rodney Martin’s preference for the Seafood Cafe found some success.

http://www.recorderonline.com/seafood-cafe-llc-gets-ok-for-changes-to-floor-plan/article_a8341604-71de-5475-9128-6e52b0c1d73b.html

Seafood Cafe LLC gets OK for changes to floor plan

Posted: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:00 am | Updated: 7:41 am, Thu Nov 14, 2013.

By SARAH ELIZABETH VILLICANA

Despite heavy scrutiny Tuesday from both Porterville City Council members and the public, council members approved changes to the floor plan of the Seafood Cafe to allow for a multi–purpose room. The restaurant, at the site of the former Olive Avenue Bowl, also operates as the El Reventon Night Club.

Owners of the Seafood Cafe and Rodney Martin, Tule River tribal administrator, have stated previously that the room may be the future site of a card room.

Ortiz clarified that approval of the CUP modification did not authorize use of the facility as a card room.“The modification is only to the existing floor plan,” Ortiz said. “Approval of future use, specifically as a card room, requires a whole separate process through the Bureau of Gambling Control Commission and the Chief of Police.”

The owners of Seafood Cafe will have 60 days to complete specified requirements of Phase I of the project, including landscaping and parking lot improvements.

The resolution allowing modification of the floor plan for the Seafood Cafe was passed 3–0 with Mayor Cameron Hamilton and Mayor Pro-tem Felipe Martinez abstaining.~~

But two years later, it all turned out differently. We don’t know why, but at some point in 2008 Rodney Martin was no longer Tule River Tribal Administrator. In a January 16, 2009 article in the Recorder, he was referred to as “the former Tule River Tribal Administrator.”  Sam Cohen took over from Martin and there were some lawsuits that ensued about irregular financial payments.  In the end, the card room remained at The Mint on West Olive Avenue. Here is the story from the Recorder:

http://www.recorderonline.com/card-room-license-suit-settled/article_4b2620e0-f1a9-5a43-86b2-d7106f3b5788.html

Card room license suit settled

Regulars gather Thursday night to play cards at The Mint on West Olive Avenue in Porterville. The Tule River Tribe has settled a lawsuit over the card room license for which it paid $800,000 for in 2007 [under Martin as administrator]. As a result of the settlement the Tribe now holds a deed to the Brickhouse Bar & Grill.

Posted: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:00 am | Updated: 6:43 am, Thu Nov 14, 2013.

BY JENNA CHANDLER

The Tule River Tribe has reached a $425,000 settlement of a civil lawsuit with some Porterville entrepreneurs over a controversial card room license deal.

A sales agreement was struck in 2007 that would have transferred the card room license of The Mint to the tribe for $800,000. The Tribe’s lawsuit alleged that the money it paid for the card room was never returned after the state made a decision to not allow the transfer.

As a result of the settlement, the Tribe now holds a Deed of Trust on the property occupied by the Brickhouse Bar and Grill in downtown Porterville — and Brickhouse partners, including James Podergois and David Gonzales, do not have to pay back the $800,000 they received from the Tribe in January 2007. According to Podergois, the terms of the settlement agreement allow five years for $425,000 to be paid to the Tribe, which he said would likely require sale of the property.

[…]

The Tribe filed the lawsuit in October 2008; defendants named were James Podergois, individually and owner of The Mint Card Room and doing business as LBC Construction; the Brickhouse Bar and Grill, Inc. and four officers of that corporation — Podergois, David Gonzales, Sherry Arleene Gonzales, and Stephanie Ellen Winn.  Was Rodney Martin forced out before this lawsuit was filed because the deals he was overseeing did not work out in the Tribe’s favor? It does seem likely.

[…]

The state has placed a moratorium on issuing new card room licenses that is scheduled to last until Jan. 2015.

Most of the money received from the Tribe was invested in the Brickhouse Bar and Grill. The former Schortman’s Bicycle Shop and an adjacent property were remodeled extensively to create the popular downtown eatery and sports bar.

At the time the card room license sale was made public in November 2007, then Tribal Administrator Rodney Martin said the time frame of the sales contract with Podergois was “challenging,” but that he believed the Tribe would be able to complete the requirements or be granted an extension provided for in the sales agreement.

In copies of correspondence included as evidence in the civil suit, Podergois said the $800,000 should not have to not [sic – the second “not” must be a type so disregard it] be returned because the Tribe had failed to secure the proper state approval for the card room within one year — a term of the sales agreement.

Documents filed in conjunction with the suit indicate that the Tribe attempted to negotiate an extension on its contract with David Gonzales proposing a new purchase price of $1.2 million in early December 2007, Podergois stating in correspondence it could be done for an additional $85,000 in February 2008, and an undated, unsigned document suggesting as much as a $3 million extension fee.

Eventually, the Tribe sued and the settlement reached in December places a Deed of Trust for the bar and restaurant property in the hands of the Tribe.

On Oct. 8, 2008, the Tribe demanded its $800,000 back from Podergois, stating “the consent of the tribe was not real, mutual or free in that it was obtained solely through mistake of law and fact. The tribe is incapable of holding a card room license in California and Business and Professions code section 19858 makes it illegal to do so.” Yet Rodney Martin was deeply involved in the purchase of a Class 2 card room license for his tribe. Did he not know this? Or was he intent on continuing it because he was making money for himself out of it, and was intending to make more? Was he fired for incompetency, for too much “risky-business”?

Before that letter was ever mailed, both parties went back and forth, accusing each other of not negotiating in good faith.

Podergois faxed the California Gambling Control Commission on Feb. 25 the same year, notifying the state agency of his decision to withdraw from the sale of his card room license to the Tribe. He claimed that requests to extend the original time line of the sales agreement went unanswered.

“My client has been requesting an answer/counteroffer from the Tribe for the last two months.  Mr. Rodney Martin, Tribal Administrator assured my client that the Tribal Council would consider his request on Jan. 24, 2008 and again on Jan. 31, 2008, my client has still not received any form of communication,”  a letter from Podergois’s attorney Greg Chambers dated Feb. 5, 2008, states. “My client is frustrated with the lack of communication and lack of progress in the transfer of the license and also on consideration of the amendment to the contract.” 

It has the appearance that when Administrator Martin’s big money-making deal was proved to be ill-conceived, and he knew of  no way to save the situation, he simply closed down and clammed up. This is behavior that Rodney Martin has exhibited since then, within “White Nationalist” circles. Several people, such as John Friend, his former partner, have attested to it.

[…] 

Tribal Administrator Sam Cohen declined to comment for this story on behalf of the Tribe. Cohen worked for the tribe in another capacity prior to the card room deal and became Tribal Administrator late last year after former Tribal Administrator Rodney Martin left the Tribe’s employment. Martin continued to write editorials in the Porterville Recorder, and in 2010, and again in 2012,  he was a candidate for Porterville City Council, but with no success. Perhaps that was what led him to decide to try out the “Truth Movement”, start visiting with Mark Weber at the IHR [Institute for Historical Review], and believe that he could make as least as good a living as Weber did, without too much work.  

In a phone conversation I initiated with current Porterville Recorder editor Rick Elkin on Feb. 10, 2014, I learned that Martin no longer writes editorials in the newspaper, but still an occasional letter to the editor.

Rodney Martin, Tule River Indian Reservation's Tribal Administrator, talks to the press in November 2007 about the tribe's purchase of a card room license.

On March 15, 2007, two months after he accepted the full-time position as Tribal Administrator for the Tule River Indian Tribe, whose Reservation was close to Porterville, California, Rodney Martin penned the following [my emphases -cy] in the Porterville Recorder, a newspaper in which he would continue to write op-eds and editorial comments in the following years.

*       *       *

“I would like to weigh in on the comments of Mr. and Mrs. Day concerning Mrs. Jennie Perez’s letter to the editor. While I will not put words into Mrs. Perez’s mouth, I believe the intent of her letter was a message of embracing diversity. What a novel idea, given we are the nation with the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor that welcomes people from all lands.

“The degree of intellectual dishonesty demonstrated by both letters from the Days was shocking, as they stated line after line in their letters about being an American without stating a single cohesive element of what really makes us Americans.

“For the benefit of everyone, there is no such ethnicity as an American. There is no American bloodline, no American DNA test, and no American language. What makes us an American is our values, ideas and principles – which by the way can be expressed in Spanish, French, English, Chinese or any other native language that an American chooses to express himself or herself in – and above all our unique ability to come together as demonstrated nationally after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and here during the recent freeze.

“Sadly, what is clear in the the letters from the Days is fear, fear of those who are different and the use of fear to divide people among ethnic lines in an “us versus them” argument that is more reminiscent of 1930s Germany than what America is really about. For this, I will pray for the Days that they will one day see diversity as a strength and love thy neighbor.

Rodney Martin, Porterville”

*       *      *

What makes this especially notable is Rodney Martin’s statements after the revelation of his January 2007 interview with the Porterville Recorder, in which he insisted the “black reporter” and the “Jew copy editor” knew that he was pro-White and had been found to be commenting on pro-White forums, and for that reason inserted the line into the published interview about his wife being a Cherokee Indian. Martin also said that those words came from him “as a sarcasm” but they (or sometimes only the Jew) kept it in the interview out of spite and hatred for Martin.

Clearly, from this editorial comment, Martin (the politician) is not telling the truth about this “Cherokee incident”, although so many WN’s believed him immediately.

Martin is siding with a Hispanic or Mestizo woman over the protests (written in two letters to the editor] of a White American couple named Day. Let’s also bring to mind that Martin formed what he calls the “American Nationalist Association” in league with John Friend, who after a few weeks dropped out of the venture.  Martin has continued it but combined it with the American Nationalist Network. When I once, following this, referred to Martin as an “American Nationalist,”  he denied that he had ever described himself as that, but only as a National Socialist. Are you confused enough, yet? In 2007, National-Socialism was clearly not something Martin identified with, being he identified with “diversity” and “the Statue of Liberty that welcomes people from all lands,” including China. This was Rodney Martin’s America.

But this is not all. Another guest column by Martin, titled “Just Say No to Extremism,” appeared  in the Porterville Recorder on October 30, 2007. (Again, my emphasis -cy.)

*      *      *

“Our community has been subjected recently to a barrage of news articles related to one “who shall remain nameless” in my article. This is on purpose because individuals of this kind thrive and indeed multiply on publicity. (Remember, not naming people is Martin’s hallmark -cy)

“First “he who shall remain nameless” used, without permission, The Recorder’s newspaper tubes to distribute hateful fliers promoting “a religion” that is nothing more than rhetoric parallel to Nazi and KKK propaganda. In fact “he who shall remain nameless” claims to be none other than a reverend: What a joke in and of itself. In fact this same reverend’s “religion” is promoted via an Internet Web site that states Adolf Hitler is a “great human being.” Get the idea where they look to for “saints”?

“Anyhow, The Recorder attempted to take legal action against “he who shall remain nameless,” all to no avail. See this “reverend” has freedom to distribute his hateful “theology” on other’s property, even if it is not wanted.

“Talk about an extreme telemarketer.

“Then the good “reverend” decided to distribute fliers on the business of a local Jewish shop owner, kind of reminiscent of the tactics Nazis used in Germany in the 1930s. Perhaps “he who shall remain nameless” is a student of history as well.

“Because we have hate crimes protection in our country, “he who shall remain nameless” was arrested, however, he was soon released, apparently for lack of evidence. It seems the “reverend” knows how to work the system.

“Then finally, we hear that once again this so-called man of the cloth has once again run afoul of the law. This time the good “reverend” was at a tavern, no doubt for communion, and was allegedly in an altercation that resulted in another individual being knifed.

“If this is the good reverend’s version of the sacrament, I can see why he has credibility issues in terms of being taken seriously as a legitimate man of the cloth.

“The larger problem with “he who shall remain nameless” is that — and people here in Porterville may not know it — this young man was sent here by this hate group, Creator Skinhead Movement, to agitate and divide this community along racial lines by using wedge issues.

“The moral challenge facing all of us is to NOT take the bait and to reject “he who shall remain nameless” and his intellectually dishonest ideology and recognize that there is no religion of hate. We must send them packing.

“We must also embrace our diversity and come together as a community to address issues facing us all. “He who shall remain nameless” likes to use hot-button issues like crime, gangs and drugs to divide us as a community. In fact, these issues are of concern to all of us and we must address them as a community, united so all of our children will be safe, secure and have a bright future, regardless of ethnicity and economic status.

“Finally, we as a community must act or risk the mistakes of history. We, as a community, must send a strong sense of outrage to “he who shall remain nameless” and his small gang of comrades that we are outraged by their tactics and they are not welcome in our community.

“We must not give them what they want. We must not recognize them as anything more then what they truly are, outsiders who come here to divide and spread hate and discontent.

“I close with the words of the Rev. Martin Niemoller, who lived to regret his inaction in Germany in the 1930s

First they came for the Jews

and I did not speak out

because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the Communists

and I did not speak out

because I was not a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists

and I did not speak out

because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me

and there was no one left

to speak out for me.”

Rodney Martin is the Tule River tribal administrator. He previously worked in city, state and federal governmental service. Mr. Martin also held Harry S. Truman and LBJ presidential fellowships. He can be reached at mail@rodneymartin.com.

*      *      *

Rodney Martin says he was raised by his German grandparents, who were members of the German-American Bund and who believed in National-Socialism and Hitler’s goals. He says his father knew Pastor Butler, and his wife’s family are hard-core racists. He married his wife “Peggy” in 1995, yet in 2007 he was so anti-Hitler?

Rodney may say, in response to this, that he was insincere in these public writings of his – for whatever reasons he might come up with – but don’t believe him. There is no way that can add up. Is Rodney Martin a government agent in the White Nationalist “movement?” Or does he work for the SPLC, shades of Veronica K. Clark (I’m somewhat joking here)? What about Deanna Spingola – is she in on all this too or does she just have incredibly bad instincts?

I know that as the messenger bringing you this bad news – as some of you will see it – I will be blamed for creating division. What a joke – I can only laugh at that. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.

I will stop here and pick this up in one more blog post as soon as I can get back to it. There are a few more Porterville newspaper items to tie into this story, particularly about how Martin got hold of so much money, but we all need a little time to digest what has already been revealed about Rodney Martin from his own pen. And maybe see how creative (or not) he will be in “splaining” it. ~

Above: Rodney Martin in 2008 (?) and Elie Wiesel – two con men.

By Carolyn Yeager

Just like Elie Wiesel, of whom we ask, “Where’s the Tattoo?,” and whose tales of sadistic treatment at the hands of the “Nazis” have been totally discredited by me and many others, Rodney Martin supplies no evidence for the numerous, fanciful claims that continue to pour out of his mouth and pen in an effort to revenge himself on this writer for telling the truth, and on everything, everyone I am, and have ever been, associated with.

Just yesterday, on February 5th, Rodney posted the following on the Facebook page of David Rottweiller Jones, a British White activist. It led me to not only respond with the below, but to do a more thorough search through the archives on Rodney Martin at the Porterville Recorder (Calif) newspaper [Rodney’s home town]. It’s amazing what has been sitting in there all this time. But I will begin in an orderly fashion with some very basic responses to what Rodney wrote on David Jones’ Facebook page. Rodney’s words are in black text, my comments are in blue.

* * *

RM: Sorry David, but I have to reply to this idiot Paul. These are all FACTS.

1. Paul Hickman broadcasts on a Network with a person who is engaged in Jew race-mixing,

Attach a name to “a person.” (One of Martin’s hallmarks is not to name people he talks about.)

2. Another Co-Host of Paul’s on his Network uses a fake name, and is on record as saying “Jews are NOT a Race”, “Jews did not create Communism” and is on record standing up for a convicted pedophile (Jews are notorious in defending Pedophilia)

Name this “other Co-Host”. Why leave people guessing? And quote his statements in context; otherwise you are not credible.

3. Has the Grand Ole Queen of Paul’s Network posted a photo of her Ex Husband, Theodore Kahant, a Jew, who was born in a Jewish suburb of NY City and whom she married in Palm Beach, Fl, a notorious Jew City, where he resided and died? By the way, Mr. Kahant’s family appears in Jewish Gen.

Name the “suburb of NY City” where so-called Theodore Kahant was born.

Give a single address in Palm Beach, FL where “Mr. Kahant” resided and died.

Post the information (with working link) that you refer to from Jewish Gen on “Mr. Kahant’s family.”

Without any of these specifics, you have nothing except your own gossip-mongering.

4. The “Cherokee matter”, i.e. the newspaper article which it was based was discredited and was shown to be discredited by many WN in the USA, who has seen me and my wife attacked in that same Newspaper for being “Nazis”, and for being “opposed to race-mixing” Interesting that my wife and I would be attacked in that newspaper for being opposed to race-mixing isn’t it? I might remind you that Hitler said those who rely on newspapers are simpletons, what does this say about Paul and his Network Drama Queen?

The newspaper article is here. Nowhere does it say it was ever discredited. No one, including Rodney Martin, has ever shown that it was discredited. It still reads: “He has been married to his wife Peggy, an Eastern Cherokee, for 12 years.”

Name the “WN’s in the USA” who have “shown [it] to be discredited” as you put it. State what they said or did to discredit it. Without any of this, you have no credibility.

5. Many WN and Revisionists have met my wife and I before she became ill, including David Irving for one, and know she is a White, Redhead, German/Irish woman with very strong racial views.

Name some of these “many WN and Revisionists.” Why mention David Irving unless you can get him to speak on your behalf? Without naming the people and providing their statements with their endorsements, you have nothing.

6. The Alexia ratings Paul cites is NOT for my Radio Network, but rather for my Research Website which is designed only for a limited audience, i.e for those who follow my research work. By the way, Alexia ratings can be artificially inflated.

Which of these two is your “Research Website?” This one: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ana-ann.com at 8.5 million rank or this one: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wvfoundations.org at 3 million rank?

To be believable, you must explain how all those people’s sites that are light-years ahead of yours are “artificially inflating” their numbers. Without further explanation backed with evidence, your mere words mean nothing.

7. I posted an announcement that I would be speaking at this years FreedomPalooza to support Paul Topete who has been attacked for denying the Holocaust Fraud. I noted that my wife and family would be in attendance and I invited everyone to attend and meet me and my family (IN-PERSON).

“FreedomPalooza” is a music festival in Pennsylvania advertised for this summer. To expect people to wait several more months, then travel a long distance at substantial expense to attend something they don’t want to attend otherwise, and at the risk your wife might not be in attendance after all – as she might get ‘sick’ and have to miss it* – is the height of lunacy, and an insult to the people to whom you owe evidence to prove what you say. By not performing the simple act of posting a wedding picture of you and your wife on your ‘Research Website’, you have no credibility.

*Is it not reckless to continually repeat that you are caring for your very sick wife at home and at the same time promise she will be well enough to travel to Pennsylvannia in June-July and hang out for a few days among crowds of people, ready to greet them?

By the way, the “attack” on Paul Topete, was written in 2010 – four year ago! – so he should not still need “support” because of it. I have also been “attacked,” (as you call it) in print, as a holocaust-denier by the ADL, and the SPLC. You have not. Wonder why they passed you by? In any case, it is no big deal.

Furthermore

RM: Also of note, Paul’s Network is quick to attack WN Activists based on discredited newspaper articles* because “she does not like my style, but the real reason is because I refused to allow [Ms. Yeager] to appear on my Network a week prior to her attack, you see, she herself was wanting to appear on David Baillie’s Show** on our Network and I said no because she wanted to use our Network as a platform to attack other Whites, so I guess my Network was good enough for [Ms. Yeager] to appear on.

* You have yet to show them to be discredited, remember?

** To prove such a self-serving interpretation, you need to present a statement from David Baillie, along with Andrew Anglin, Scott Roberts and Mike Delaney, who were all a part of this ridiculous episode , and publish them to prove “Ms. Yeager wanted to attack other Whites.” I have every one of the emails involved, and I can publish them if necessary. Would you like me to do that? Without corroborating evidence for your interpretation, you have nothing.

RM: Finally, I might add, I was told that the Queen of Paul’s Kosher Network announced the Listenership on a recent broadcast, if that number announced is correct, our Listenership exceeds Paul’s Network by far and we have only been on the air less than 12 months and our web site has only been up 60 days and is NOT the web site Paul referenced.

In spite of “what you were told,” on this broadcast I did not say anything about listenership, but only about website visits and pages viewed. Therefore, you cannot even know from what I said that “our listenership exceeds Paul’s Network by far,” can you? You fail in Logic 101.

Again, you must publish proof of your listenership and be specific about where it is coming from and exactly what you are referring to … if you are making claims about it. Without doing that, your mere words are empty air and only demonstrate that you are a con-man.

This is Part 1. To be continued … the best is yet to come.

This month’s special program is the music of Dresden. It will be broadcast each Wednesday, Friday and Sunday starting at 9PM ET streaming continuously until the next scheduled program.

The Legacy of Dr. William Pierce: Call of the Blood album reviewed (1995) has links to high-quality audio downloads, lyrics, and this brief review:

Dresden is Joseph Pryce and Knut Pedersen.

All songs by Joseph Pryce except Horst Wessell Song paraphrased by Joseph Pryce.

Dresden’s new album, Call of the Blood, is a new kind of music for White people. Crafted with jewel-like care; with haunting, poetic lyrics; beautiful yet powerful arrangements and instrumentation; and soaring vocals; Call of the Blood combines the best elements of rock and traditional European music. Call of the Blood includes a lyric sheet to help you fully experience the impact of these new, masterfully written and produced songs. Call of the Blood will open a gateway in the minds of Aryan youth to a new and brighter future. – Kevin Alfred Strom

The Archives for Joseph Pryce at The Occidental Observer links three articles from 2010, including Jakob Friedrich Fries and the Intellectual Origins of Anti-Judaism in Europe. The author’s bio reads:

Joseph Pryce (email him) is a writer, poet and translator. He is the author of the collection of mystical poems Mansions of Irkalla. Mr. Pryce was born in Brooklyn and studied for the Roman Catholic priesthood for three years (Redemptory’s Order) and then attended Brooklyn College. He says for himself; “I was a musician for many years and recorded several CDs, but literature has always been my first love (especially poetry). I live with my wife, 30,000 books, and a dog and four cats on Long Island.” His translation of the German philosopher Ludwig Klages’ work will be published shortly by Arktos publishing company http://www.arktos.com/ [Ludwig Klages: The Biocentric Worldview].

Total runtime: 65:23

(Note: There is no audio download for this program – please tune in via the MP3 Stream.)

This month’s special program is a speech made by Jack Pershing in 1983. It will be broadcast each Wednesday and Friday starting at 9PM ET streaming continuously until the next scheduled program.

The Warrior and the Poet: J.E.B. Stuart and Ezra Pound at National Vanguard:

For the first time in written form, we present a profoundly inspirational speech by Jack Pershing, delivered 30 years ago this month at the General Convention of the National Alliance. (By clicking on the embedded player you can listen to the original recording.) This is one of my very favorite essays and speeches. — Kevin Alfred Strom

Pershing’s conclusion:

It’s going to be a long war. At times each of us will feel the clammy fingers of despair clutching at his throat and hear an insistent voice, clamoring, “Give up, it’s no use.” Help one another. When one weakens, another must be strong. In the midst of the wreckage of a dying civilization take your inspiration from your heritage and from each other. Nietzsche said that we should love war. I believe that — for only in struggle can we develop to our maximum potential.

Rejoice, then, for it has been given to us to be soldiers in the greatest war of them all. As Zarathustra said, “I do not exhort you to peace; I exhort you to victory. What good is long life, what warrior wants to be spared? I do not spare you; I love you from the very heart, my brothers in war.” Thank you.

Listen to JEB Stuart and Ezra Pound (via flawlesslogic.com).

Total run time: 43:39

It is not part of this special broadcast, but what called my attention to Pershing’s speech was Kevin Strom’s recent announcement at National Vanguard, American Dissident Voices: Renewal and Rebirth:

On this, the twenty-second anniversary of the first American Dissident Voices broadcast, a group of those who worked closely with William Pierce over many decades is gathering together to do something about it. Not only are we re-starting ADV, we are re-forming the National Alliance and building a headquarters and media center in a new redoubt in Dr. Pierce’s beloved Appalachian mountains.

The National Alliance’s long-time Membership Coordinator, former Green Beret Will Williams will manage the new Alliance; I will direct its media. Both we and others who will be assisting us behind the scenes worked directly with Dr. Pierce, some of us on a daily basis, for decades.

Listen to the broadcast (via nationalvanguard.org).