Facebook Twitter Gplus RSS

Twisted Identity

When you’ve gotten past the guilt-tripping, the pathologization, and the demonization, the next hurdle is the attack on White identity.

“Aw gee, who’s White anyway? What does White really mean?”

This installment continues the examination of ethny, nation, and race – what they are and how they are related. The terms “civic nationalism”, “cultural nationalism”, and “deracinated nationalism” demonstrate how the meaning of nation, specifically, has become so distorted and misunderstood.

I cite the Wikipedia article Ethnic nationalism:

Herodotus is the first who stated the main characteristics of ethnicity, with his famous account of what defines Greek identity, where he lists kinship (Greek: ὅμαιμον – homaimon, “of the same blood”[2]), language (Greek: ὁμόγλωσσον – homoglōsson, “speaking the same language”[3]), cults and customs (Greek: ὁμότροπον – homotropon, “of the same habits or life”)

See also, Nation:

A nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, or history.

In this definition, a nation has no physical borders. However, it can also refer to people who share a common territory and government (for example the inhabitants of a sovereign state) irrespective of their ethnic make-up.[2][3] In international relations, nation can refer to a country or sovereign state.

According to Joseph Stalin writing in 1913 in Marxism and the National Question: “a nation is not a racial or tribal, but a historically constituted community of people;” “a nation is not a casual or ephemeral conglomeration, but a stable community of people;” “a common language is one of the characteristic features of a nation;” “a nation is formed only as a result of lengthy and systematic intercourse, as a result of people living together generation after generation;” “a common territory is one of the characteristic features of a nation;” “a common economic life, economic cohesion, is one of the characteristic features of a nation;” “a common psychological make-up, which manifests itself in a common culture, is one of the characteristic features of a nation;” “A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture.” According to Stalin, this would exclude Jews as they have no common territory.[4]

An alternative view, expressed by Otto Bauer, author of Social Democracy and the Nationalities Question (1907), that “A nation is an aggregate of people bound into a community of character by a common destiny.” would include Jews.

Identity in US presidential selection season headlines – Russell Simmons: Romney and Ryan ‘will destroy our people’.

Rich, famous, non-White Russell Simmons sent a series of twits on 11 August 2012:

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, two men who will destroy our people… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

W/ ryan as vp choice women gays minorities & all undeserved and compassionate people now have clear direction #Obama

Now women have a clear choice for President, Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

African-Americans have a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

Latinos have a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

Compassionate people have a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

Under-served communities have a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

LGBTQ community has a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

All minorities have a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

All young people have a clear choice for President. It’s Barack Obama… http://bit.ly/QQjEul PLEASE RETWEET

The bit.ly link is to an article Simmons wrote, Mitt Romney & Paul Ryan, Two Men Who Will Destroy Poor America!

Simmons’ outburst highlights the two faces of contemporary anti-White identity politics. His article presents a classic Marxist view – class warfare, rich versus poor. His tweets present the more modern, cultural Marxist view – a coalition of non-White races and various other victim group identities versus the over-served, uncompassionate, old, sexually normal White men.

The podcast will be broadcast and available for download on Tuesday at 9PM ET.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
5 Comments  comments 

“Hitler escaped the Bunker” and other delusional thinking

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
23 Comments  comments 

Günter Deckert: Frictions in the Eurozone

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
13 Comments  comments 

“The International Jew” Study Hour – Episode 7

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 

Nationalism and the Holocaust: A Reply to Johnson

Published on August 8, 2012 by in Blog

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
83 Comments  comments 

On Identity

Who is us?

A spectrum of emotional indicators of identity: empathy, sympathy, apathy, and antipathy.

The layers of the biological onion: self, family, clan, tribe, ethny/nation, race/species, animal/vegatable, life as a whole.

For White identity the focus is on mid-sized groupings (ethnic, national, racial) whose nature is ideological (memetic) as well as biological (genetic).

How and why jews pathologize and demonize these identities, specifically for Whites who express them.

Who determines who us is. How biology limits and shapes ideology, but ideological divides and shifts, driving long-term biological change. The United States of America is an example of this, with the identity shifting over time from European and Christian under White rule, to a multi-racial “nation of immigrants” under jewish rule.

I quote The Humpty-Dumpty Theory of Language, from Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass, in preparation for subsequent examination of mainstream conceptions of group identity:

“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory’,” Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t- till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’”

“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master-that’s all.”

The podcast will be broadcast and available for download on Tuesday at 9PM ET.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

We need a White man’s ADL

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
45 Comments  comments 

Rodney Martin on Nadja, Greg and Mark

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
21 Comments  comments 

Everything Greg Johnson knows about the ‘Holocaust’ he learned from Mark Weber

Published on August 3, 2012 by in Blog

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
17 Comments  comments 

“The International Jew” Study Hour – Episode 6

[CONTENT REDACTED BY REQUEST OF THE AUTHOR]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
4 Comments  comments 
© the White network