Facebook Twitter Gplus RSS

John Lennon (Loved and Hated)

 November 17, 2012

This week is about one of the biggest cultural ‘movers and shakers’ of our time. John Lennon, unofficial leader of the biggest musical act in all of history, that being The Beatles, will be discussed and viewed under the magnifying glasses of our host, Robert Lloyd. Lennon is uncovered in a negative light at times, but also we hear some of the greatest musical compositions that he wrote and created. At the end of the hour we will hear Robert’s production of Lennon from about 10 years ago with a collage of Lennon’s songs culminating with his untimely and tragic death in 1980. The show covers:

*Young John, as he was taken from his mother and was raised by his Aunt Mimi;

*Though always inquisitive, he grew as a child into a rebellious teenager;

*He was a chauvinist as a husband to his first wife, but became a feminist later on with Yoko Ono;

*Was responsible for 25 number one songs on the American billboard;

*How could such a mean spirited man write such beautiful music?

Listen as John Lennon is exposed for both his good side and bad.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
53 Comments  comments 

53 Responses

  1. Can’t wait to listen, JL was the reason I became a songwriter, sadly his politics were as flawed as the man.

  2. John Lennon’s music is not music for White people; it does not reflect the best of White people but the worst. He played his role in the cultural, sexual and drug revolution of the 1960′s, then later in the further dissolution of values with Yoko Ono. His later music is mostly just pretty and touching songs about “love” with a mesmerizing quality, raising “love” to the highest value. “Luv” is weakening, not strengthening … and he ended up laying in bed most of the time smoking dope and putting out the message “Make Love, not War.”

    The reason the Beatles were the “biggest musical act in all of history” is not because of great talent or great music, but because they were hyped by the globalist media-Jewish music industry to catch on with the huge new dope-smoking, sexually liberated youth industry (even the youth who were not sexually liberated yet). Everything became an industry from then on. Like Windows. Like Oprah. Like Justin Bieber!

    Just because a person’s skin color is white, doesn’t make him representative of what is White.

  3. Carl

    I haven’t played the whole show.

    I think the Beatles must be situated as an example of the decline of the White race. It doesn’t move me that they focused on singing and didn’t bother with dancing. They are decline because they were part and parcel of stimulants and intoxicants, race-mixing, rejection of parental authority, slovenliness as culture, and so on. I believe that they are an expression of a race that had been told it was guilty of “the holocau$t”. I believe it is important to dislike things that have important symbolic flaws. For example, if a ballet shows negroes or Asians holding aloft a White woman, that is disgusting, and the ballet becomes a disgrace, because non-white men have nothing to do with supporting a White woman. And a White female dancer who tolerates that situation is deluded and brainwashed. So not even ballet is safe. In the case of the Beatles, the flaws are not just symbolic but flagrant. So, I can’t like the Beatles, because I know too much. Do I sometimes hear “Paperback Writer” in my head? Sure! But then I turn down the volume.

    We may be on track to lose all of our countries and land, and millions of our people to attrition and race-mixing. But it’s important to stay focused, so the remnant will have clearer leads to pick up on.

  4. Peter

    Well done!
    John Lennon was a great artistic spirit. He always challenged himself at his deepest core, using his art to expand his awareness.
    I wonder what other transformations he might have shown us if his life was not cut short.
    You treated his memory with respect. thanks.

  5. Robert

    Thanks for the comments. I read them all and realize we will all disagree with each other at some point. But to discard White music merely because you don’t agree with someone politically or socially, then you are going to be listening to metal, skinhead, garage band quality non-music. Have fun.

    Tchaikovsky was a bi-sexual, yet is one of the greatest composers of all time. Lennon was a communist, anti-Christ, and a race mixer (I made that mistake once too) and I mentioned these things throughout the show. Yet he composed L-O-V-E which may be one of the finest songs of the Twentieth Century. Did I mention Lennon was WHITE?

    Lennon was shameful, but so is Mitt Romney. And Romney is WHITE. I didn’t vote for him, but he is WHITE. Most all of our White artists have been corrupted, but when they write and compose great music, I will recognize it on merit alone or I will have very little music to listen to. That would be a world I wouldn’t want to live in.

  6. Carl

    You are quite right, that much of the White population is corrupted. I nonetheless try to filter out anything that plainly encourages that corruption, or led to it. In the case of Tchaikovsky, I have heard the idea that he had that infirmity, but, even if true, his music doesn’t actively promote it, nor does any marketing or packaging of Tchaikovsky promote it.

    It isn’t my desire to seem the least bit argumentative or difficult! :) I have another thought about these modern entertainers. I wonder how reliant they are on technique and amplification. For example, if Lennon’s voice were not piped through various electronic devices, would he in fact sound like rubbish? Possibly. I think the modern ones are often products.

    I have made a brief initial investigation into which classical music composers are Jews. It is remarkable to discover that in reality the Jews are the least interesting specimens! The most worrying was the Strauss family, who suffer the tragedy of having a Jew in their line. What’s funny, though, is how many conductors are Jews. Very funny. They can’t make beautiful music, but they like to network and fund things in such a way that they can jump out in front and lead it. (Many conductors are clearly labeled as Jews on the Internet, but one exception is Marriner, Sir Neville, for whom I cannot find a clear confirmation, other than his inclusion in a database called milkenarchive.org. A database, by the way, quite filled with ‘composers’ that one has never heard of! The Jews love to do this. They make “art” and “music” and then they expand the roster of “Jewish artists”. Jewish “art” is often just grotesque rubbish, blotchy and hideous.

  7. Robert

    >>For example, if Lennon’s voice were not piped through various electronic devices, would he in fact sound like rubbish?<<

    Thanks for the clarification, and no Carl, I appreciate your comments, pro or con. To answer your above question, it was Lennon who hated his voice and insisted at times to have it electronically altered. I see this in many singer-songwriters, including myself, until they either accept their pathetic ability, or mature to the understanding that it is alright to not be an opera style voice, or whatever. Lennon actually had one of the best natural singing voices in all of rock history. He gave George Martin fits, of course with his poor self image or disdain for his voice.

    It is the karaoke stars that Nashville now gives everyone, or American Idol type singers, that are enough to make someone gag at times… well, me actually. I urge you to look closely at the pure genius of the White race (notwithstanding their tainted Jewish learned self-hatred) with Lennon being a prime example. The very last Lennon production of my program gives you absolute proof of his genius of melody… It doesn't get any better.

    And I also understand the difference between being a pervert and promoting the perversion. That is a classic differentiation of left vs right. We on the right, know we have sin, but we don't want to inflict the disease and try to make it an acceptable trait.

    You made some great points Carl. Thanks!

  8. What you neglected to inform the listeners to, was Lennon’s mother was killed by a drunk who happened to be an off duty policeman i.e “Bobby”. Could be why he hated authority, and the system/goverment.

  9. Robert

    NJM: I did mention Julia was killed by a drunk driver (with time constraints I didn’t go into he was an off duty policeman). But his attitude and personality were already formed before that, at least from my perspective. I can see that with you knowing that, you are a true student of Lennon as I am too.

    Thanks for the comment NJM.

  10. Pat Hannagan

    Robert, I haven’t heard the show yet, but I have enjoyed immensely your last.

    Lennon was an awakening for me in my youth. I detest a lot of what he says, and at the same time I relate to a lot of his songs.

    Holding off my judgement till hearing your show, I just want to post this song, as a tribute to Lennon. It relates to my own awakening. From my favourite Lennon solo album, I Found Out:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jKZEvwKzj8

    (It has all the heartfelt righteous anger of a White person realising the bullshit they have been sunk with)

  11. Pat Hannagan

    Matter of fract, just listening to the album from go to woe, this is an album of WN awakening.

    From Mother, the lost mother we all feel, to the eradication of God, and the desolation we feel as a result.

    I cannot recommend this album highly enough. (As for Beatles, my favourite is Magical Mystery Tour. Though a compilation of sorts, rather than an album, it packs so much emotion and maudlin remembrance(love of White culture) into each and every song)

    I can say, that when I used to smoke mull, and work at a pub into the early hours, the thing that kept me going was Paul McCartney’s “Two of Us”.

    Love this song. It has kept me on the straight and narrow ever since:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ztr8j_-gD4

  12. Carl

    Reading more of the comments, it strikes me that for a White who is awakened, enthusiasm for some of this music can be sort of etiological, or the study of it even clinical. You can observe the problem, and that becomes part of the pleasure. Somehow, for me I just don’t like being absorbed in it, because I don’t think it’s our best work as a people. Our best work is “classical”, from the time when Jews were required to live in kennels, and couldn’t ‘wander’ so freely.

  13. Pat Hannagan

    It’s not about our best work as a people, Carl.

    I will be seeing Wagner’s Lohengrin next February in Berlin, and I am looking forward to it.

    Still, our music doesn’t begin or end with classical, and anyone who says it does is missing White Joie de vivre.

    I like Covington’s Irish Rebel Songs every bit as much as I have recently learned to be awe inspired by a Beethoven symphony.

    Robert recently criticised Randy Newman’s voice, yet I disagree. You listen to this song, and you feel not only happy, but that there was a time when we were in love with our time and place.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b5LzCOc98E

    I hope we can capture again the love for our simple way of life, and the simple way we express our love for each other.

  14. From my favourite Lennon solo album, I Found Out:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jKZEvwKzj8

    (It has all the heartfelt righteous anger of a White person realising the bullshit they have been sunk with)

    But Pat, Just what is the “bullshit” that Lennon, and all those listening to it, are referring to? Maybe not the same as what you’re thinking it is. So in that sense it’s just another rebel song … kids growing up and rejecting their parent’s values or social norms. It can apply any way.

  15. Mary, White Advocate

    Carolyn, your comment (November 18, 2012 at 9:53 am) is a perfect analysis of the John Lennon and Beatles phenomenon. No matter what anyone says, the Beatles are nothing more than another Jew-hyped, Jew-marketed group that, if the music industry had not decided to make money off of them, they would have been unheard of outside of Liverpool, England. While John Lennon did write some nice songs, they aren’t any better than those of other composers and do not deserve the accolaids they often receive by the present media.

    However, what bothered me about the show was not about John Lennon at all, but Robert’s revealing how he manages, or rather, controls his family when he, who calls himself a “Christian,” said that (starting at 29:51 on the podcast) a man should be a “chauvinistic”, followed by “I am the lead pastor of my house … My wife doesn’t vote … I won’t have my wife voting … I cast the final vote … followed by “ I do think a man has a right to pop his wife should she need it.” “A man is made bigger and stronger and faster for a reason. That is to keep peace in the family…”

    Women can and do make foolish choices in voting for “the best looking” man, but so do men. We both know that one should make his/her candidate choice after reading over the issues, analyzing the candidates’ past decisions and actions, and vote according to our own, thought-out conclusions.

    However, it is unacceptable for any man to believe and say that “I won’t have my wife voting” as though the wife is just a mere puppet without her own ability to think things through and make her own decisions.

    Far worse are Robert Lloyd’s comments that, while men should not “hit a woman,” a man “having the “right to pop his wife should she need it” while being “bigger and stronger and faster” “to keep peace in the family … “ made the final decision for me. I will never listen to or acknowledge Mr. Lloyd as either an internet radio commentator, song writer, or authority on music again. He has just ended whatever respect I may have had for him in the past by advocating physical violence against someone who is weaker than himself.

  16. Pat Hannagan

    Yes, Carolyn, the Beatles and Lennon were at the vanguard of the social/sexual revolution and breakdown of British and American society.

    Lennon is fairly conflicted on the subject. One minute he’s singing about revolution, the next he’s saying it’s nothing to take seriously. The album I cited is mostly about freeing himself from the role of super-star rock and roll singer, saying that it’s all delusional. And he’s right on that point, though of course, he was a very wealthy man at that point who could do whatever he pleased.

    I see Lennon, the image, as more of a product of society rather than a deliberate attempt on his part to undermine “the system”.

    I like the line from Ministry’s “So What” (which I think is taken from an Edward Wood movie):

    Juvenile delinquency is always rooted in adult deliquency, and in this process parents play the key role. When children grow up among adults who refuse to recognize anything that is fine and good or worthy of respect…

  17. darkhorse

    According to author Geoffrey Giuliano in his book Darkhorse:the Private Life of George Harrison ,the Beatles lead guitarist, had a fascination with Adolf Hitler.

    Giuliano writes:

    “Perhaps one of the most bizarre aspects of George’s personality is the fascination he shares with friends Dereck Taylor and Larry Smith regarding Adolf Hitler. Harrison and his pals are not Nazi sympathizers , but they still find something undeniably fascinating about the Fuhrer.

    “It’s just that they appreciate the unparalleled degree of his absolute madnes…..They only dug him in a silly Monty Pythonesque way”….. say a friend.

    Author Giuliano concludes:

    “Such tidy rationalization fall short of explaining why Harrison keeps so many photos of Hitler around his house. Allegedly he even displays a huge German swastika at times”

    From the book
    Darkhorse:The Private Life of George Harrison
    Plume Books 1989

  18. I see Lennon, the image, as more of a product of society rather than a deliberate attempt on his part to undermine “the system”.

    I don’t think Lennon or the other Beatles were personally attempting to breakdown society for the Jews either, but that’s still what they ended up participating in. Along with many other “stars.” What gets me is the in-studio “mixing” and special effects that makes all these singers and bands sound so much better than they would straight on. They are absolutely nothing compared to a Caruso or a Fischer-Dieskau. As far as the song-writing, is it really all that great? It’s good, but some of it is insipid. I think a large part of the great esteem you guys hold them in is that they are a part of your youth … your teenage years. The music of my teenage years seems very special to me, being associated with memories that are so poignant. So it goes.

  19. Mary, White Advocate – thanks very much for writing what you did. It needs to be said and I hoped someone would say it. Only a woman would, it seems, as I had the same reaction as you. I don’t really care about a man’s religion or his marital relationship, especially if his wife goes along with it, but making the statement about a man’s right to “pop” his wife (which means a fist to the face, even if a fairly light one) if she “gets out of line” (in the husband’s estimation apparently) is not acceptable on The White Network. Robert further said he might do a whole show on that subject! :-? What music would that be put to?!

    I really want to encourage real partnerships of equality and mutual respect between White men and women. We can’t attract women to this cause by relegating them to 2nd class status.

  20. Etienne

    For what it’s worth, I thought the wife-beating remark was well out of order too.

  21. Carl

    As a male, let me dodge the thing by saying first, I didn’t know the remark was there, and second, I have never seen a White woman who needed any sort of hitting. It’s always the men who need it. So maybe the point is entirely theoretical. But actually I think that not a great deal of hitting is needed. A bit of corporal punishment as children should suffice, methinks.

  22. Hawke

    I listened to this after reading the above statements. First of all, let me say that I really like Robert’s show. He does a damn good job.

    After listening to what Robert said, I’m going …so what?

    Robert did not advocate wife beating, as a matter of fact he made a distinction between what John Lennon had been (a wife beater) and something Sean Connery remarked upon which was that women were not above being slapped if they got out of line.

    Robert never advocated punching a women in the face..

    Second issue: Women not voting.

    A White nationalist man who believes women should not vote. That happens to be a very strong sentiment among many men in the WN community and for damn good reason.

    Bottom line: Nothing Robert said was out of line. Many women in the WN movement are upset about the realization of the total lack of support for ethno-politics among women and find it convenient to blame men for it when the real fact is most women flock to power and authority (our enemies) and detest WN because it has none of those right now.

  23. katana

    Mary, White Advocate
    November 21, 2012 at 4:40 pm

    Far worse are Robert Lloyd’s comments that, while men should not “hit a woman,” a man “having the “right to pop his wife should she need it” while being “bigger and stronger and faster” “to keep peace in the family … “ made the final decision for me. I will never listen to or acknowledge Mr. Lloyd as either an internet radio commentator, song writer, or authority on music again. He has just ended whatever respect I may have had for him in the past by advocating physical violence against someone who is weaker than himself.

    ——————-

    Mary, I disagree.

    Robert has it right.

    Woman need to know their place, and an open handed whack may be necessary on rare occasions given the nature of some women. That’s all I think he meant. I’ve done it a few times.

    Women, despite *jmedia BS, are protected by men at great personal physical risk. Part of that bargain is male dominance.

    Our jmedia has taught woman to want to keep their cake while also eating it.

    If you feminize men to the point that they are frightened of whacking you then they become useless in defending you. That’s the sorry state we are in now. White men incapable of defending themselves let alone their woman.

    What do you chose?

    ——–
    *Needless to say, jmedia = jewish controlled media.

  24. To Hawke and katana,

    Some correction is needed: Robert did say “pop” several times; he never said “slap.” A pop could be to the body also, it is true; it doesn’t have to be to the face. But a pop is definitely a punch.

  25. Roger

    Carolyn wrote:

    “I don’t think Lennon or the other Beatles were personally attempting to breakdown society for the Jews either, but that’s still what they ended up participating in.”

    I agree with that to some extent. I see them as idealistic romantics, more interested in “having a good time” than anything else. Easy fodder for a Jewish businessman like Brian Epstein to turn to his advantage, in other words. However, there are some clear examples of them using their popularity and influence to effect social changes, especially from the late-’60s onwards. I think their reasons were more self-indulgent than malicious.

    In a recent book entitled “The War We Never Fought”, the journalist Peter Hitchens extensively documents the involvement of the Beatles (and Paul McCartney in particular) in the pro-drugs movement. He points out that a pro-drugs lobbyist called Stephen Abrams persuaded McCartney to pay £1,800 for a major advertisement in The Times, letting people know about a “Legalise Pot” rally in Hyde Park:

    “McCartney agreed to organise the money. [Barry] Miles says that Steve Abrams called up Peter Brown and Brian Epstein’s office who sent round a personal cheque for £1,800 made out to The Times.” (Hitchens, pp. 116)

    Here is a short video about this affair, in which you can hear Paul McCartney talking about his political lobbying:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsEgTh5599E

    Here is a video of the event from a 1967 BBC documentary:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxOfFJfiMng

    Speakers included such kosher intellectuals as Allen Ginsberg and Stephen Abrams himself. Watch out for the woman wearing a dress with a photograph of Bob “Dylan” (Zimmerman) printed on the front. Also listen out for the BBC narrator’s conflation of “free expression” with the legalisation of drugs, as if the “freedom” to taint one’s body with harmful drugs is comparable to the freedom to publish historical research without fear of imprisonment.

    I also find it interesting that Allen Ginsberg is playing “music” on the harmonium in this video, and making references to the Eastern religions. Is this not the exact same thing that George Harrison was doing on the Sgt. Pepper album, which had only been released one month before this event? It is telling that Jews like Ginsberg were operating within the same milieu. The Beatles were more melodic and attractive than the balding homosexual Jew, of course, so their efforts reached a much wider audience.

    As for me, I would rather listen to Fischer/Schwarzkopf than Lennon/McCartney.

  26. Carl

    For whatever reason, White men have become utterly useless at defending their land, territory, patrimony, genetics, women, and everything else. White men are just gaping, stuffing their pie-holes, and worshiping Negroes on television.

  27. katana

    Carolyn
    November 23, 2012 at 9:28 am

    To Hawke and katana,

    Some correction is needed: Robert did say “pop” several times; he never said “slap.” A pop could be to the body also, it is true; it doesn’t have to be to the face. But a pop is definitely a punch.
    ———————-

    Carolyn, couldn’t resist, … but perhaps “pop” is some kind of musical reference??

  28. Brit in Norway

    There is a lot of information if you delve that McCartney was replaced in 1966 ( hence no more touring after 66 US tour.) The Beatles certainly seemed to be a tool of social destabilization in the late 1960s on many levels. Subsequent albums certainly allude to the death of McCartney in an occult manner. Lennon himself went from being married to a pretty white woman to Yoko Ono, from a high Japanese banking family.

  29. I looked into that whole McCartney replacement story in depth several years ago, encouraged by a friend who really believed it! Or wanted to because he was a conspiracy lover. It’s a hoax.

    As to Yoko Ono, she was a powerful woman, as she continued to exhibit later — which just showed that John Lennon was not a powerful man, but a rather weak one … as a man. A truly talented song-writer yes, –WELL, AN ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT, A LOVER NOT A FIGHTER — but rather impotent otherwise. That’s my view.

  30. LOL, nice try katana. :-) You do take differences in stride and keep the conversation going. BTW, no one is stopping Robert from posting comments on this thread, in case anyone has that idea.

    katana, I’ll keep the conversation going (even though it’s unpleasant and many people don’t like it) by addressing this from you:

    If you feminize men to the point that they are frightened of whacking you then they become useless in defending you. That’s the sorry state we are in now. White men incapable of defending themselves let alone their woman.

    I don’t believe for a minute women want to feminize men, anymore than men really want to sexualize women. We’re all guilty of wanting to get our needs met, as we perceive and experience them, at the expense of the greater good. But isn’t it the same enemy behind “feminizing” men that is behind “sexualizing” and “objectifying” women? That’s the Jew. To hide himself, the Jew created Feminism as something White men could hate and blame as the cause of their troubles. Women, of course, were given a place among the “minorities” so they would receive extra special treatment and really rub it into White mens’ noses.
    Everything has been distorted by the Jew, and we are left seeing and treating one another as the enemy instead of it.

    It’s a sorry state when White men like you will say that for men to be real men they have to be able to whack their wives, and girlfriends too, “when needed” or they cannot defend them “when needed.” From a woman’s point of view, you can understand that’s not a convincing proposition – all it does is drive away women. There are a lot of violent men who then are allowed to hit women – an uncontrolled, cowardly and, if I might say so, un-Aryan thing to do. White men need to go after the real enemy, the real problem – the Jew. How well are they doing that???

  31. Adrean

    A white man does not strike (hit, slap, punch) a woman. Period.

    Then again, it does get a bit confusing for some when women want to get in the boxing ring, or football field, or battlefield. Are women in these roles no longer women? May white men hit, slap, and punch such females? Or would real women honor the social contract and agree not to enter such fields, in exchange for continued immunity from casual violence?

  32. Adrean – thanks. In my opinion, women should not be allowed in the military except in supporting roles; ditto for Police, Firefighters, Oil Drilling Rigs, and all professions that require physical strength. It would have to be enforced. There is a big problem of rape in co-ed military units and I can understand why. I have no interest in trying to protect these women who put themselves in harm’s way. I personally would never want to do these things, but it starts now in early youth with the Jew-directed anti-nature social conditioning that demands girls see themselves as equal to boys in every way — the genderless revolution! They want to play football. Well, a few of them might be pretty good, the Kennedy girls played touch football with the Kennedy boys. But if they were really hit as hard as the boys are, they wouldn’t last long. Then there’s the Lesbian aspect … the rise of the homosexual. I don’t like the Maennerbund at all, as promoted by the Counter-Currents crowd, but do think a healthy division between the sexes is in order.

  33. Carl

    I think that when the girls play boys’ sports, the boys don’t want to hit them hard or play equal with them. So it’s unfair to the boys. You can’t remove nature entirely.

  34. Brit

    You know what is sad? John Lennon’s first wife, Cynthia, is now married to her 3rd husband. A negro from Trinidad. Did anyone happen to see McCartney with all those rabbis earlier this year? He always liked the Jewesses.

  35. Carl

    Sad? Or predictable?

  36. Robert Lloyd

    To the listeners of my show:

    I have read the comments to “John Lennon – (Loved and Hated)” and appreciate the support from many of you. Of those that object to my opinion, I recognize that I am controversial at times, and certainly at odds with many of the worldly concepts that are accepted as ‘truths.’ I’m not for everybody.

    One thing I promised from the beginning was that I would NEVER lie to you. I always say what I ‘believe’ to be the truth. That does not mean I am always right, and no one in the world can say that. But I can say that I always will state ‘what I believe is the truth’… so help me God. That you can take to the bank.

    And that is why I spoke of Lennon being physically abusive to women (which I do not believe in). I also mentioned that actor Sean Connery (who was agent 007 and has been knighted by the Queen of England) was interviewed by 60 Minutes, a few years ago, and that he stated a man should have the right to strike his wife should it be necessary. The interviewer in the show found that hard to believe and so asked Connery’s beautiful wife of 35 plus years if he had ever struck her. She said emphatically – never.

    Ironically, though I am portrayed here by some as some sort of wife beater, I have NEVER struck a female in my life. I have 4 sisters, three grandmothers (one step), a mom, daughter, and have had three wives (not at the same time however) and to date, haven’t hit any of them. Only one time have I ever thought of striking a woman, and it was 24 years ago. I had my 6 month old daughter in my arms and my ex-wife was having a temper tantrum (over what, I can’t remember) and she took a heavy mechanical clock from a dresser and threw it at me from about 10 ft away. It missed us but could have easily killed my daughter.

    So yes, I believe a man should have the right to ‘pop’ his wife in such a circumstance. Had I physically stopped the threat, I would have most likely gone to jail. It was fortunate that nothing went further and we eventually divorced. By the way, my daughter (at about 6 or 7 years of age) chose freely to stay with me after the divorce and I raised her as a single dad. I would contest anyone to say they were a better father to their child than I was (or am) to my now grown daughter.

    So here we have a guy that has never struck a woman, never even gave his daughter a spanking (probably should have a few times:-), have never been arrested or even accused of any violence, his last speeding ticket was probably back in the 1970s, does not use profanity, is a college educated professional Christian man, is someone who will not allow a woman to take the trash out as it is a man’s duty, and an individual more likely to be the person that stands between a wife beater and his abused wife than the majority of people that would normally ‘just not want to get involved.’ I’m a White Nationalist and want nothing more in life than to see a White nation surface somewhere in this world.

    But my reason for leaving the White Network is really something few people are aware of. Carolyn Yeager feels she has to try and assert some sort of control over my shows in various ways, whether it is to object to my opinions on life in general (that I give in my shows just as she gives in hers), my overt faith as a Christian, and my disdain of feminism, to name a few things. If I am to be honest to anyone that listens to my shows, I will not have someone telling me how or what I can talk about. That just won’t happen. It will always be MY show and the White Network can run it or not. They chose to no longer run the show.

  37. Did anyone happen to see McCartney with all those rabbis earlier this year? He always liked the Jewesses.

    How right you are.
    http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/63139/day-before-wedding-sir-paul-goes-to-shul/

    “It is not the first Jewish event that McCartney, 69, has attended with Shevell, 51. He made a surprise entrance at a Chabad house dinner in New Jersey in December, honoring her father, Myron, who had donated $500,000 for a Torah program. And it is said to be Shevell’s influence that led him to play in Tel Aviv last year.

    McCartney’s first wife, American Linda Eastman, who died in 1998, was Jewish. His second wife, former British model Heather Mills, is not, although she does sell a range of vegetarian products supervised by the Manchester Kashrus Authority.”

  38. Brit

    Robert,

    I am so bummed that you left the White network. I really enjoyed your shows. I loved your positive attitude and your knowledge and insight. How can we contact you?

  39. Brit

    Carolyn,

    Paul McCartney is currently married to another Jewess.

  40. Carolyn Yeager feels she has to try and assert some sort of control over my shows in various ways, whether it is to object to my opinions on life in general (that I give in my shows just as she gives in hers), my overt faith as a Christian, and my disdain of feminism, to name a few things.

    I have not objected to any of those things. What I objected to was stating approval for a man “popping” his wife “if she needed it.” Simply that. It’s best to stick with the facts. If you want, Robert, I can publish the emails that passed between us.

  41. Robert Lloyd

    I stand by what I said.

  42. Adrean

    The enemies of our people need only to sit back and allow disagreements such as these to fracture any cooperation we achieve. It sounds like a number of people enjoy Robert’s shows and would like to see them stay. It also sounds like a number agree that talking casually about male-on-female violence is a major turnoff.

    Would Robert be willing to accept that this issue is a turnoff and should be avoided, and Carolyn forgive and give this show another chance? I think the listeners would like that, if you could reach a consensus.

  43. katana

    Well this is a disappointing development. I’ve enjoyed listening to the show particularly as Robert is so forthright and frank in his opinion of things. He’s definitely not Politically Correct and combined with his knowledge of the music industry makes for a fascinating program.

    Robert’s made a comment that has offended some people (not me) and now his show has stopped. Everyone happy now? Let’s get things in perspective, theWhiteNetwork no doubt offends about 99.9% of White people what with our holohoax views and similar!

    I really think both of you should both give a little ground here and try again.

  44. Carl

    It seems to me that the example Robert gives of an occasion on which it might be reasonable to hit an aggressive woman is unrelated to whether the aggressor is male or female. In other words if someone is about to release a projectile in a direction that will injure a child, it may be best to interrupt that action. Options may be limited. It would depend on circumstances.

  45. I appreciated the show, it was very informative to me ot find out how much of great melodies were written by whites (where I only knew non-white cover-versions).
    I would appreciate it if a reconciliation was possible as expressed by commenter katana above. From the positions htat were expressed, they actually doesn´t seem far apart. Maybe emphasis should be given to the things in common, not the things in conflict, to avoid unneccesary friction and keep a bigger impact.

  46. Robert Lloyd

    I have read the recent posts and am truly blessed by what has been said and thank you everyone. Adrean, as far as agreeing to not talk about a subject, that is Pandora’s box. But look, we can clearly see that some people need to be watching ‘The View’ on TV or something similar, than what my show offers. My programs can upset those that have been so inundated with Jewish views that they get hysterical because of a man speaking from his heart. Again, I’m not for everyone.

    And Brit, my contact info is on the introductory page of “Rockin’ the Music World” and I answer all e-mails and telephone calls.

    Carl, you are right that in a sense, the issue is not man vs woman. But consider this… if a man attacked me like my ex did 24 years ago, he would have been stopped. Had I stopped my ex, I would have gone to jail. So I hope you can understand, there is a difference.

    We can see with the huge power now of this socialist state, women have spun their own trap in the stranglehold of the White male in ‘his’ house. Now we have a rampant out of control divorce rate that has created a living hell for our kids. With a strong male presence in the family, peace is established. Boys don’t contest dad because he is bigger and stronger. That same boy runs wild with the single mom that he knows cannot physically do anything about his bad behavior. Yes, he is bigger and stronger, and for a good reason.

    And thanks for the continuing support Katana. I will get my show on somewhere as “my wife wants me to do it.” Hmmm… I married well. Now where’s that paddle?

  47. Mary, White Advocate

    After reading the comments in this thread, including Mr. Lloyd’s remarks, I am compelled to add my input to the discussion. Real men do not need to think that they have to “pop” their wives to keep “peace” in the family and real women do not behave in such a manner that a man would show hostility towards her. As a woman, I look up to and respect men who are protectors and leaders of our Northern European (Nordic, Teutonic, Slavic and Celtic) peoples. The Jew has destroyed much of this by feminizing men into wussy weaklings who think that they “need” to “pop” their wives to keep “peace” in the home and women who behave like the bitches on The View and other TV shows and movies, all of which are the product of the Jew.

    I have a theory as to why men in the USA are such a bunch of weaklings, eager to be led like docile cattle.

    A major part of the destructive process of feminization is the promotion of circumcision, not just for Jewish baby boys, but for ALL babies born in US hospitals.

    Carolyn has spoken out against male infant circumcision and for that I want to award her some kind of medal as this procedure is nothing more and nothing less than a sex crime against children and should be persecuted with jail sentences of not less than 25 years to life. One of the severest crimes carried out by the Jews, if not the worst, is the strong encouragement, if not literal enforcement, of male circumcision in the United States, especially since World War II with over 70% of the US male population having been and being circumcised.

    The Jews and their gentile sycophants are responsible for this cruelty against children as they are the ones promoting genital mutilation of little boys by telling new mothers that it is “more sanitary” plus other flimsy invalid excuses. Most American mothers, still groggy from the medications given during childbirth in the typical US hospital maternity ward, are handed a paper with the word, “Phimosis” (Greek for narrow strait) across the top or even “Circumcision consent form” or other words to that effect. Because there is a good chance that the woman’s husband was circumcised, she scribbles her signature on the form and her son is circumcised with an additional $200-$600 added to the hospital bill.

    One reason the Jews enforced infant male circumcision is that, throughout history, this was the one way that the Jew could be differentiated from the rest of the population in Europe (and elsewhere). We know that the Jews have been expelled from every European country, city state, kingdom, duchy, etc., at least once every one hundred years and one sure way to tell Jew from Non-Jew was male circumcision. Of course, one won’t find this in any history books because Jews control the media that includes textbook (and other) publishing firms. I learned it from eye-witness accounts of the “inspections” for “Pediculosis Pubis” (pubic lice) where the German soldiers in Poland and Russia had all the men drop their trousers and under-drawers. The men who were not circumcised were often allowed to go, while the Jews were stripped and, well, we all know the rest. I heard several accounts from Russians (my daughters’ father was Russian) who told me how they were spared because they were not circumcised. And this procedure was brought to the United States by the Jews so that any future “inspections” would not be feasible as too many non-Jewish men had been mutilated.

    Aside from physical appearance and physical effects such as discomfort due to exposure of an area of raw mucous to the outside environment, one can imagine the devastating psychological effect this must have on the average male. One can only imagine how a man must feel, discovering that a very private part of his body had been permanently disfigured. I have read accounts of where men think that their very masculinity has been violated, and, indeed, it has. No wonder circumcised men feel as though they had been feminized. One can only imagine that a man considers himself not a real man as part of his very manly identity has been taken away from him. No wonder men in American are such “wusses!” I am certain that this feminization of men is all part of the plan; the ancient Hebrew slaves were circumcised, like their masters and what are we to the Jew, “goyim” (cattle) or slaves.

    I have been told that some men are so angry at their mothers for signing that permission form that they consider matricide! Several men of my acquaintance are completely alienated from their families because their moms allowed them to be circumcised. Others become quite defensive and claim, “lots of men are circumcised,” forgetting or not knowing that, outside of the predominantly Muslim countries and Israel, the USA is the only place where the majority of males are circumcised. In fact, I even heard one man, who was so insanely jealous of uncircumcised men, proclaim that “every man ought to be circumcised” so that, I would assume, all men are forced to share the misery.

  48. Robert Lloyd

    >>Real men do not need to think that they have to “pop” their wives to keep “peace” in the family and real women do not behave in such a manner that a man would show hostility towards her.<<

    And here I thought you were through with me Mary? And let me restate my thoughts for you again so we are absolutely clear on this: I believe with all my heart that a man was made bigger, stronger, and faster, in order to keep peace in the family. Because of this 'threat' that is inherent in the proper family (less government interference with its Jewish, feminist, atheistic propensities), in most cases no violence would ever be needed. Peace reigns.

    You can ask the men in your life (if you have any) if they would think back to their childhood, and admit that when dad was gone to work, we took advantage of dear old mom and could get ornery. Come closer to dinnertime, when dad would be coming home, our behavior would improve so mom wouldn't tell on us and we'd not risk getting a whooping (oh yeah, even a 'pop').

    Somehow 'circumcision' got into this discussion? Never heard a song about that subject yet.

  49. Mary, White Advocate wrote:

    Real men do not need to think that they have to “pop” their wives to keep “peace” in the family and real women do not behave in such a manner that a man would show hostility towards her. As a woman, I look up to and respect men who are protectors and leaders of our Northern European (Nordic, Teutonic, Slavic and Celtic) peoples

    It might help you and others to understand that the wife who threw a clock at Robert while he was holding their baby (according to his story) was Korean. We are usually led to believe that only White women do things like that! It is my opinion that usually when White men marry Asian (and Mexican and other non-white women) it’s so they can play the big boss and enjoy more or less submissive wives. It is not intended to be a marriage of equality in the tradition of our, as you say, Northern European people. But these women do not always turn out to be so submissive after the marriage vows. :-)

  50. Disappointed white guy

    I’m a white man against interracial relationships and popping. My non-white girl friends were always abusing me. One tried to bite off my nose and left me badly disfigured.

    Stay with your own kind!!!

  51. Robert Lloyd

    To add more on the culture of the Koreans… it is said that 1/3 of all Korean men beat their wives. It is an abhorrent behavior and their country was embarrassed in the world stage during the 1988 Summer Olympics that were held in Korea. If some here remember, during a boxing match that didn’t go well for the Korean boxer, his coach lost his cool and physically attacked the other boxers handlers. It stunned the world and tarnished the country’s image.

    There are some things I do admire about the Koreans, such as during the Los Angeles ‘Rodney King’ riots, the Korean Americans defended their businesses by arming themselves with rifles and driving off many of the rioting Blacks. They are a hard working group of people and start many small businesses. The car industry is becoming world renown and a point of national pride. They sent troops to Vietnam in support of the US. They were fierce fighters and were known to actually take ‘scalps’ of the communists and hang them to the outside of their camp’s tents. The Viet Cong supposedly chose to stay away from them.

    However, in the orient, there is a racial pecking order just like anywhere else in the world, with the Japanese being the top dog, followed by the Chinese, and then the Koreans. After that, the south-eastern Asian countries such as the Vietnamese, Burmese, Cambodians, Laotians, etc, are not given the same stature, and for good reason.

    As far as submissive wives… I did not see it in the mixed marriages that I observed. But I wound not advise any man to marry a woman that would not submit to his authority. And that is biblical. I also would not suggest a woman marrying a man that would not love her as Jesus loved the church. That too is biblical. Life is a two way street, even though the feminists here in this comment section do not comprehend that with their hatred and hysteria.

  52. Mary, White Advocate

    Robert, men were not only made “bigger and stronger and faster” to keep peace within the family, but, more importantly, so they can protect families from outside harm. Men were and still are, or should be, guardians of their families and extended group, i.e., people of European Ancestry. As you learned your lesson on race mixing, I won’t comment on that, save to agree with “Disappointed White Guy” who advises us to “stay with (our) own kind.”

    I brought circumcision into the discussion because this is one way, perhaps the worst, way in which the Jewish cult has spread its malignant influence over our folk, especially here in the USA. I strongly believe this is only one way in which the Zhid (Russian slang for Jew) has infected our society and culture.

    Robert, you are right about bringing the Jewish control of the music and entertainment industry to our attention. It is now almost impossible for a musician or song writer to get any exposure and earn a living without a Jew behind him or her.

  53. JBW

    As to Yoko Ono, she was a powerful woman, as she continued to exhibit later — which just showed that John Lennon was not a powerful man, but a rather weak one … as a man. A truly talented song-writer yes, –WELL, AN ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT, A LOVER NOT A FIGHTER — but rather impotent otherwise. That’s my view.

    I believe, O,K I KNOW (from a informed sociological observation of current British angst) that all British middle-class school boys were, have been and are unconsciously conflicted by years of conditioning by their Upper Class Betters. Those that aren’t conflicted, become the backbone of the system, growing up to become those grey men (tyranny of the clerks) of the patriotic type, or tools of the Empire that went of twice to kill the Jerries for the honor of the Empire.

    The gals too, although they are more adaptable and less prone to radical violence than their English Boyfriends, but therefore much more in tune to the values and necessities of the home and hearth, have been completely sublimated into the Greatness of the British Hive Mentality, psychologically speaking, and unfortunately, the chickens have come home to roost.

    Yes, absolutely, wussie stuff, at the psycho-social level for the whole English Speaking Word’ The truth of the matter, psychologically, was that “Young John” was conflicted and tramatized early one which helped feed his poetry, became sexually active early in life, even before his marriage to Cynthia, (which I am sure gave him a bit of a “creative” edge in his song writing, i.e. emotionally able to wow the teenyboppers with his smooth sophistication) and became more conflicted as he and all of the Beattle became more public people, the fact became, that people actually wanted to know what the lads “thought” about things, handlers be damned.

    Dr. John Coleman (an ex-MI5 man and British expatriate) calls the Beattle’s: A Tavistoc PsyOp, and this makes perfect sense to me after following this particular thread. Let me explain:

    1. Does anyone remember the b & w TV coverage of British young people (Mod’s and Rockers’s)a-rioting and a-burning in the streets at a the time before the British music scene got legs (late 50′s, early 60′s?)?The SCENE (i.e., BBC involvement, top of the pops, various bands brought out and then “puffed”, groomed and played on radio) stared out over there following this civil unrest.The so-called “Mod’s” and the so-called “Rockers” were doing pitched running warfare against each other, much like the US anti-war riots in the US in the late sixties. But these were disaffected British Kids in the aftermath of the loss of the British Empire willing to bugger the rulers and burn the cities! Thus, a PsyOp of a major scope and scale, by an already tongue-in-check talmudized brit establishment, had been authorized by HM’s Government (social engineering branch)to completely hypnotize and encourage through the new magic medium of television, the tried and true propaganda arm of the BBC and the Press, to calm the wretched proletariat, latter magicly evolving into an hipster cash cow and subsidized money machine.

    2. What better way to take some of the energy away for those that might question the real history of the British infamy in the late war with the German Reich than a little bit of foolishness to turn the head of a whole generation of English Speaking Teenagers and their parents.

    3. When the Boy’s started to understand that they were highly paid role-player’s in this ongoing piece of English Language mind control, they started to send out sublimated messages (rebelling through drugs, occult practice, experimental psychological and social memes, if you will) resulting in the bands late albums, John’s loss of grip on reality (his “God”/”Christ” complex if you will) his hook up with Oh No and total liberated idiot behavior in the prime time media cesspool.

    4. Other groups, Zep, Floyd, Cream, et.al. that came out of the far end of that evolution of the PsyOp were even better draws, as the weirdness became, well, total bazarre, as the witches and werewolves were incarnating to the occult practices of what became an American Funded Occult Art Colony of London, with assorted piss-ant want-a-be devil possessed spin off turd bots in the US counter culture marked of marginally talented and intellectually challenged (compared to the British standard (sic.)) of Jewish Oriented freaks and, oh yes, the very, very musical black folks.

    The British upper-class has been Jew-ridden for the better part of 300 years, having in the meantime compromised the Empire to the total destruction of the British Folk and middle-class, and the Royal Family, are wondering what God Hath Wrought. All Things Must Pass, Sunshine Superman!

© the White network