Facebook Twitter Gplus RSS

Jews Versus Whites – Part 2

Continuing a review of fundamental ideological distinctions between jews and Whites.

In August 2000 Tim Wise provided his own personal jewish narrative – clearly identifying himself as a jew, his sympathies for jews like his grandfather, and describing how it fuels his antipathy for Whites:

For the sake of becoming American (and that had really meant to become white), one had to give up what one was, in order to metamorphose in Kafkaesque fashion into something one was not: a white man.

At the end of the day, even with the advantages that come with transformation, one has to wonder if it was a decent bargain: to trade your traditions and political-cultural soul for a permanent guest pass at someone else’s club, and a shot at the vice-presidency. The self-doubt we Jews have on this score is likely part of the reason we cling to the model minority myth with such dialysis-machine like ardor: it allows us to think it was worth it after all.

The terms minority and majority reveal a significant distinction between jews and Whites. Ordinarily a minority group is regarded as morally superior to the majority, which is often justified by pointing to differences in wealth or power. The exceptions are telling: Israel, where jews are the majority, and South Africa where Whites are a minority. White minority rule over South Africa was regarded as immoral and illegitimate, was boycotted and ultimately brought down. Meanwhile, jew minority rule over the United States is denied and otherwise disguised, and exposing or opposing it is painted as irrational and immoral.

“The Jewish Question” – Jared Taylor Vs. Brit sheds further light on Jared Taylor’s view of jews. Taylor implies that there is no racial distinction between Whites and jews – that the jewish question is not a question of race. Furthermore, he claims there are jews “entirely on our side”. Taylor’s point of view is more favorable to jews than Whites. Judaism, Culture and the Gentile World: A Conversation with Rabbi Mayer Schiller provides a window into the mind of an AmRen jew.

I’ve previously discussed the idea, propagandized primarily by jews in the jewsmedia, that something being “too White” is a problem. They have exactly the opposite attitude about “too jewish”. This was illustrated by the hysterical reaction to a relatively mild and innoculous statement Miley Cyrus made last month.

Miley Cyrus: Music Industry Too Old, Too Jewish To Understand Her Appeal, at Weasel Zippers:

“It’s always weird when things are targeted for young people, yet they’re driven by people that are like 40 years too old. It can’t be like this 70-year-old Jewish man that doesn’t leave his desk all day, telling me what the clubs want to hear.”

Miley Cyrus’ Anti-Semitic Slip is Showing, at Tablet Magazine:

But Miley’s comment deserves attention because of its very particular context. As Jody Rosen poignantly noted in New York shortly after her now-notorious twerking turn at MTV’s Video Music Awards, the singer’s current reincarnation is a bit of minstrelsy

As Rosen convincingly argues, such masquerading has frequently served as “a shortcut to self-actualization” for white people, from Al Jolson onwards. Entertainers have understood and applied minstrelsy as a performative process by which white—and, in the case of Jolson, Jewish—performers could remake themselves as all-American pop stars.

Rosen: The 2013 VMAs Were Dominated by Miley’s Minstrel Show, by Jody Rosen, 26 Aug 2013:

A doctoral dissertation could (and will) be written on the racial, class, and gender dynamics of Cyrus’s shtick. I’ll make just one historical note. For white performers, minstrelsy has always been a means to an end: a shortcut to self-actualization. The archetypal example is in The Jazz Singer (1927), in which Al Jolson’s immigrant striver puts on the blackface mask to cast off his immigrant Jewish patrimony and remake himself as an all-American pop star.

Miley Cyrus’ Shocking Anti-Semitic Remarks, at Hollyscoop:

Miley Cyrus’ entire point of living is to shock people. However, baring her midriff, rapping, and loving ecstasy is no longer shocking to anyone so Miley has moved on to thoughtless racial comments.

The point is that shocking Whites is regarded as normal, while the simple mention of jews is regarded as shocking. Both the standard and the threshold could hardly differ more.

One of the more hysterical expressions of jewish outrage came from hyper-jewess Debbie Schlussel – “View” Hags Attack Jews, Defend Miley Virus’ Anti-Semitism; Jenny McCarthy: “Jews Know How to Make Money; Whoopi: “Jews Controlled Music Industry”.

Burlington Takeaway: Words Whites Can’t Say touched on a legal distinction between Whites and jews.

New Legal Tools Fight Anti-Semitism, CLJ’s Susan Tuchman Says, July 2007:

That legal tool is Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Thanks in part to the efforts of Tuchman, anti-Semitism can now be challenged under Title VI.

The good news, Tuchman said, is that the inclusion of Jews as a protected class under Title VI was recently endorsed by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, a bi-partisan agency that investigates and studies discrimination, reporting its findings to Congress and the president. In 2006, the Commission recognized that anti-Semitism encompasses more than name calling and threats, and that sometimes it is expressed as “anti-Israelism” or anti-Zionism.

The Commission accordingly recommended that colleges and universities come out and condemn anti-Semitism, Tuchman explained. The Commission rejected the argument that universities could remain silent because of the perpetrators’ right to free speech; instead, the Commission said, the schools had a moral obligation to take a stand against anti-Semitic speech.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is an outgrowth of Title VII (no discrimination in employment) of the Civil Rights Act. EEO Terminology:

Discrimination: Any act or failure to act, impermissibly based in whole or in part on a person’s race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap, and/or reprisal, that adversely affects privileges, benefits, working conditions, results in disparate treatment, or had a disparate impact on employees or applicants.

Disparate Impact: Under EEO law, less favorable effect for one group than for another. Disparate impact results when rules applied to all employees have a different and more inhibiting effect on women and minority groups than on the majority. For example, nonessential educational requirements for certain jobs can have a disparate impact on minority groups looking for work, as they often been limited in their access to educational opportunities.

Disparate Treatment: Inconsistent application of rules and policies to one group of people over another. Discrimination may result when rules and policies are applied differently to members of protected classes. Disciplining Hispanic and Afro-American employees for tardiness, while ignoring tardiness among other employees, is an example of disparate treatment. Such inconsistent application of rules often leads to complaints.

The podcast will be broadcast and available for download on Tuesday at 9PM ET.

 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
7 Comments  comments 

7 Responses

  1. Markus

    If Miley would have said that a 70 year old White man would push her around, she would have been celebrated for “saying as it is”.

    Just apply the same tricks on all the pathological Whites, the Jews or Blacks who attack us. Tell them, they imply hatred and genocide and criticize their blatant anti-aryanism.

    They may say, Jesus was a Jew. Tell them that Judaism is only a religion and he was an Aryan by blood (blonde, blue eyed) and criticized the Jews. After all, he WAS a Jew but became the founder of Christendom.

    Our enemies need to know that they must be more tolerant toward White Nationalists and accept diverse point of views in a democracy! 😉

    Just “hijack” their anti-racism programming and put yourself into the position of a percecuted minority (which we are). They understand the logic and must go in full conscious denial or offense to bar us from our “basic human rights”. Just uttering the trance-like hypnosis programming doesn’t work then anymore.

    Use all their trigger words and mechanisms against them. That will gain us sympathy. It works for the Jews, why not for us? I personally rebutted a number of attacks by the enemy and especially well meaning, useful idiot White kinsmen.

  2. “Identifying Where the Power Lies”

    Brett Light
    Daily Stormer
    November 2, 2013


  3. ulf

    what would happen if there are rallies against anti-aryanism? In front of every camera there will be some new persons yelling things like “more gas-chambers!” or “free the planet from sub-humans!”. Double Standards. In the moment when the non-whites reach the share of 51% in the USA for example, the whole consensus will switch against the sinister minorities…..

  4. Markus

    Miley seems to be not the only one exposing the Jews for controlling Hollywood.

    JTA and Staff Report
    The father of pop star Katy Perry, a preacher at an Ohio church, ranted against Jews during a sermon.

    “You know how to make the Jew jealous? Have some money, honey,” Keith Hudson, 63, said during a recent sermon at the Church on the Rise in Westlake, the Daily Mail reported.

    “You go to L.A. and they own all the Rolex and diamond places. Walk down a part of L.A. where we live and it is so rich it smells,” he said. “You ever smell rich? They are all Jews, hallelujah. Amen.”

  5. Jackson


    Thank you for your massive efforts to explain what you’ve come to understand about this war of mostly covert hostility waged against the sons and daughters of Western Civilization.

    You mentioned early in this broadcast about how jews typically follow a pattern of rhetoric, stating their moral pontifications clearly at the beginning and end of their rant, but filling the space between with rubbish that “makes your eyes glaze over”.

    If you’ve heard the term “pilpul”, I think this might be a key in understanding how they can so effectively short-circuit the normal reasoning processes of us Gentiles.

    I first came across the term “pilpul” while reading “The Controversy of Zion” by Douglas Reed, who described it as a method devised by the rabbinate for the purpose of allowing students of the talmud to “question” the meaning of talmudic passages, while still confining them within the “acceptable limits” of inquiry. By leading themselves and each other through a strange kind of “mental gymnastic” routine, they would exhaust themselves and ultimately be more compliant to the final authority of the rabbi, who would then give them the definitive answer to their question.

    Sort of like letting a willful dog run around the yard until it tires itself out, returning to its master’s house docile and compliant.

    Many jews still send their kids to yeshiva school where this technique is propagated to future generations, and jewish parents argue this way in the homes as well. I believe jews internalize and hone this black art of dialectical argument in this way, just as people might enter a dojo to study a martial art.

    In a culture that tends to shy away from heated argument as a habit of civility, I believe us Gentiles are ill prepared to counter this. I can find almost no additional info about “pilpul”.

    If you’ve heard this term and have further understanding of it that might help us all, I’d love to hear your take on it sometime.

    I look forward to your show each week.

    Thank you!

  6. Fred Wilson

    Miley Cyrus can kiss her ‘career’ goodbye.

  7. Jackson,

    Here’s what I think about “pilpul”, which was discussed in Jewish Crypsis – Religion – Part 1:

    Hairsplitting, a “talmudic” tendency toward tedious arguments, is another key jewish characteristic. In the context of judaism the need arises out of contradictions created by jewish dishonesty about who they are and what they believe. The most important argument for jews revolves around the question: “What is good for the jews?”. Much confusion is created by their own attempts to disguise, deny, or otherwise explain this away.

© the White network